Tuesday, October 14, 2025

The Art of Eastern Storytelling


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At the public library I found an interesting little 2025 book by Henry Lien titled Spring, Summer, Asteroid, Bird: The Art of Eastern Storytelling. There is a Google Books preview of the first 15 pages. He says although we may be used to seeing the usual:

 

WESTERN STORY STRUCTURE

 

Act One – Setup

Act Two – Confrontation

Act Three – Resolution

 

there also is a different:

 

EAST ASIAN FOUR ACT STRUCTURE

 

Act One – The Introduction of the Main Elements

Act Two – The Development of the Main Elements

Act Three – The Twist/New Element

Act Four – The Harmonizing of All Elements

 

and there also are Circular/Nested Structures. 

 

Sections and Chapters in his book are (with examples in italics):

 

OPENING BOWS

Diversity = Forms, Not just Faces  3

A Game of Lenses  4

Disclaimers and Definitions  7

Hamilton and Different Levels of Diversity  8

Cultural Appropriation  9

‘Spring, Summer, Asteroid, Bird’  11

 

ACT ONE – The East Asian Four-Act Story Structure

Western Story Structures  17

East Asian Four-Act Structure  21

‘The Daughters of Itoya’  25

Parasite  29

Nintendo (Mario and Zelda Games)  39

Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World  46

Your Name  53

Four-Act Structure in Western Stories  61

 

ACT TWO – Circular/Nested Story Structures

Circular/Nested Structures  69

The Story of the Stone  72

Rashomon  75

The Merchant and the Alchemist’s Gate  81

Everything Everywhere All at Once  88

Metroid Games  94

Circular/Nested Structures in Western Stories  97

 

ACT THREE – People Aren’t People

Introduction – ‘Shakespeare in the Bush’  103

Cultural Arrogance  105

Individualism versus Collectivism  107

Surface Diversity  113

The Opposite of Surface Diversity  115

 

ACT FOUR – Values Dictate Structures

Values Dictate Structures  123

Values Dictating Four-Act Structure  125

My Neighbor Totoro  127

Values Dictating Circular/Nested Structures  134

Hero  139

The Thousand and One Nights  147

 

CLOSING BOWS

 

He has an article at NextBigIdeaClub on March 5, 2025 titled

What Western Creatives Can Learn from Eastern Storytelling.

 

There is also a post at the reedsy blog on November 22, 2023 titled Story Structure: 7 Types All Writers Should Know.

 

An 1842 painting by Marie-Éléonore Godefroid of the Thousand and One Nights came from Wikimedia Commons.  

 

Sunday, October 12, 2025

Use ugly sketches to give a great presentation


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is an interesting 11-minute TEDx talk by Martin J. Eppler recorded on May 18, 2024 at TEDxDonauinsel and posted on December 31, 2024 titled Want to Give a Great Presentation? Use Ugly Sketches | Martin J. Eppler | TED. He said to:

 

Use provisional, unpolished images

Apply fitting visual metaphors [simple and concrete]

Vary your visuals

 

At 7:20 he has a monochrome cartoon image with visual metaphors (and captions at the right). My color PowerPoint version (with captions at the left) is shown above.

 

Martin also has a 32-page e-book from 2022 titled An Introduction to Visual Variation for Better Leading, Learning, and Living.

 

My PowerPoint slide used cartoon images of a bridge and car from OpenClipArt.  

 

Saturday, October 11, 2025

What experts know that you don’t


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a useful ten-minute YouTube video by Jim Cathcart on May 4, 2025 titled What Top 1% Experts Know That You Don’t. He shows a sketchy flipchart with Do (Doing) on the horizontal axis and Know (Knowing) on the vertical axis. And he mentions both can either be low or high.

 

We can divide things into a 2x2 table, which I have redrawn as a slick color version using PowerPoint, as is shown above. If both what you Know and what you Do is low, then you just are a Passenger (someone sitting in the back of the airplane). If what you Know is high but what you Do is low, then you are a Critic. If what you Know is low and what you Do is high, then now you are a Competitor. Finally, if both what you Know and what you Do is high, then you are a Leader (an Expert).

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Furthermore, as shown above, there are six levels of expertise (in increasing order):

 

Competent

Excellent

Expert

Leading Authority

Celebrity

Star

 

 

Friday, October 10, 2025

Is nobody afraid of public speaking?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On August 31, 2025 I blogged about a dogmatic claim that everyone fears public speaking in a contrary post titled Not everyone fears public speaking. The opposite and equally silly claim has turned up in a five-minute YouTube video by Jim Cathcart on October 8, 2025 titled Nobody Is Afraid Of Public Speaking. He mentioned:

 

“It’s widely known that public speaking is the greatest fear in the world. That comes from a study that was done in the 1980s or 1990s and it ranked public speaking as the number one fear but it was a limited study and it said that public speaking was feared more than death itself. But that’s not a scientific fact. That has not been statistically validated.

 

But the point that I’m making is that those people who say that they’re afraid of public speaking are not afraid of public speaking. They’re just not. They’re afraid of being judged. Right?”

 

Back on May 19, 2011 I blogged about America’s Number One Fear: Public Speaking – that 1993 Bruskin-Goldring Survey. Jim didn’t mention any survey showing no one feared public speaking.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lots of people have no problem with being judged: they participate in speech contests, like the series with 30,000 people held by Toastmasters International starting at clubs and leading all the way up from Area, to Division, to District, to Region, and their World Championship. Page 30 of the March 2001 Toastmaster magazine describes that Mr. Cathcart would receive the Golden Gavel award from Toastmasters in August 2001.  

 

Silhouettes of a podium and a judge both were adapted from OpenClipArt.  

 

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

A flawed article by Dr. Cheryl Mathews on what public speaking anxiety statistics say


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a flawed article by Dr. Cheryl Mathews at SpeakCalmHQ on September 10, 2025 that is titled The Biggest Myth About The Top Fear: What Public Speaking Anxiety Statistics Really Reveal. She discusses the 2024 Chapman Survey of American Fears to point out that public speaking is not the number one fear. But Cheryl also creates a couple new myths. Her six takeaways are:

 

1] Public speaking is not the top fear Among Americans despite popular myths.

2] The real number one fear for most people is corrupt government officials.

3] Only a minority – about 29% - experience strong anxiety about public speaking.

4] Most people’s public speaking anxiety is mild and manageable.

5] Severe speaking anxiety can hurt careers and quality of life, but there’s help out there.

6] Accurate, recent public speaking anxiety statistics come from Chapman University surveys.

 

She says other highlights are:

 

Corrupt government officials. Over 65% of Americans are very afraid or afraid.

Death. Number two in the fear rankings.

Public speaking anxiety. Number 59 out of a long list, with only about one quarter of Americans affected by significant speech anxiety.  

 

If you look at the 2024 Chapman fears list for Very Afraid plus Afraid, you will not find Death listed at #2, or at all. That #2 is from the Jerry Seinfeld joke. Dying is listed as #51 at 31.6%. People I Love Becoming Seriously Ill is #2 at 58.4%. And People I Love Dying is #4 at 57.8%. On October 24, 2024 I had blogged about how In the tenth Chapman Survey of American Fears for 2024, public speaking only was ranked #59 of 85 fears at 29.0%.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Mathews has a section titled Breaking Down Public Speaking Anxiety: Three Main Groups that begins with a pie chart for public speaking fear that I’ve instead shown above as a bar chart. Her Group 1 is Not Afraid or only Slightly Afraid (71%). Her Group 2 is Afraid or Very Afraid (29%). Group 3 is Very Afraid (Phobic, 12%). But Phobic is not quite the same as Very Afraid! Back on December 8, 2019 I blogged about how a Toastmasters press release confuses a fear of public speaking with a phobia. In that post I pointed out that along with being intense a phobia is also persistent and interfering.

 

Cheryl’s fourth takeaway is that most people’s public speaking anxiety is mild and manageable. I have discussed that another way, via a fear score, in a blog post on June 1, 2025 titled An article on stage fright by David Pennington claimed public speaking was the #1 fear in a Chapman Survey, but ignored their nine other surveys where it was ranked from #26 to #59. On a scale from 1 to 4, the Fear Score for public speaking was always around 2 – just Slightly Afraid. The first sentence of Cheryl’s article asked: “What scares Americans the most?” What she discussed instead was What do the most Americans fear?


 

Near the end Cheryl has a brief section titled What About the Global Population? which states:

 

“We don’t have a lot of data globally. However, we can assume from these global anxiety surveys that the percentages above generally reflect patterns in other countries and across the global population.”

 

The 2024 Chapman survey found 29.1% of Americans feared public speaking. But back on August 15, 2012 I blogged about how Surveys show that public speaking isn’t feared by the majority of adults in nine developed and eleven developing countries. Only 13% in nine developed countries feared public speaking/performance. And just 9.4% in eleven developing countries feared public speaking/performance. That 13% is less than half, and 9.4% is only a third of what the Chapman survey found.  

 

The grim reaper cartoon was adapted from this one at OpenClipArt.

 

 

Tuesday, October 7, 2025

Surrounded by bad books from Thomas Erikson

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back on February 4, 2020 I blogged about how The Toastmasters Pathways Level 2 project on Understanding Your Communication Style says there are four communication styles. Where did they come from? In that post I discussed the DISC model from William Moulton Marston (Dominance – Influence – Steadiness – Compliance). I mentioned that a popular Swedish book from 2018 by Thomas Erikson, titled Surrounded by Idiots had restated those four categories as colors. Now there is a new 2025, fully revised and expanded edition of that bookSurrounded by Idiots: The four types of human behavior and how to effectively communicate with each in business (and in life). There is a preview at Google Books. He very briefly mentions the DISC model. But finally on pages 333 to 335 there is a short reflection on its history.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On page 37 of the book (and a color version at the inside front cover) there is a four-column table with Different Characteristics per Color, as shown above. The second row has wording for DISC, but there is no explanatory column at the left. Then, on pages 38 to 40, there is another excruciatingly long table listing Characteristic Traits with thirty rows that does include an explanatory column.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And on page 100 there is a 2x2 table (as shown above) with those four types. [He didn’t show the words for DISC, but I have added them].

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, in Chapter 22 beginning on page 251 Thomas discussed The Most Common Combinations of two colors, as I have shown above in another table.

 

The book jacket claims that:

 

“Thomas Erikson is a Swedish behaviorist and the bestselling author of the Surrounded By books, a series about human behavior and communication. The series, including Surrounded by Idiots, has sold more than ten million copies in 70 languages.”  

 

A half-dozen other books in the series are (in chronological order):

 

2020

Surrounded by Psychopaths: How to protect yourself from being manipulated and exploited inbusiness (and in life)

 

2021

Surrounded by Bad Bosses (and Lazy Employees): How to stop struggling, start succeeding,and deal with idiots at work

 

2021

Surrounded by Setbacks: Turning obstacles into success (when everything goes to hell)

 

2022

Surrounded by Narcissists: How to effectively recognize, avoid, and defend yourselfagainst toxic people (and not lose your mind)

 

2023

Surrounded by Energy Vampires: How to slay the time, joy, and soul suckers in your life

 

2024

Surrounded by Liars: How to stop half-truths, deception, and gaslighting from ruining yourlife

 

A post at Reddit pointedly asked Has it occurred to Thomas that he might be the problem?

 

Thomas did not bother to add information from his other books to his latest revised one about Idiots. I found at the public library and skimmed all his others except the Energy Vampires one. Here are excerpts from some of them.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 54 of the Psychopaths book has a better 2x2 table (as shown above) with those four DISC types.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And pages 78 and 79 of his Setbacks book has a better table with a description of the four colors (as shown above). Thomas did not bother to repeat those two improved graphics in the revised Idiots book.   

 

Similarly, there is a better Description of DISC on pages 82 and 83 of Surrounded by Psychopaths:

 

The DISC Model

 

Not everything in an individual’s behavior can be explained by the DISC model.

 

There are other models that explain behavior, but I use this as the basis because it is simple to digest and teach. There are more parts of the puzzle than the colors to map various behavior patterns.

 

The DISC model is based on thorough studies and is used throughout the world. It has been translated into more than fifty different languages.

 

Historically, there are similar views in different cultures – for example the four humors described by Hippocrates, who lived in Greece about 2,500 years ago.

 

About 80 percent of all people have a combination of two colors that dominate their behavior. Approximately 5 percent have only one color that dominates behavior. The others [15 percent] are dominated by three colors.

 

Entirely Green behavior, or Green in combination with one other color, is the most common. The least common is entirely Red behavior, or Red in combination with one other color.

 

There may be differences between the sexes, but I do not deal with the gender perspective in this book.

 

The DISC model does not work for analysing people with ADHD, Asperger’s borderline personality disorder, or other disorders.

 

There are always exceptions to what I claim in this book. People are complex – even Red people can be humble, and Yellows can listen attentively. There are Green people who deal with conflict because they have learned what to do, and many Blues understand when it’s time to stop fact-checking. Problems in communication arise when people lack self-awareness.

 

My own colors are Red and Blue and a bit of Yellow. No Green to speak of. Sorry.”

 

An article edited by Lotten Kalenius from the Swedish Skeptics Association (VoF) on April 15, 2024 is titled One of Sweden’s biggest scientific bluffs which discusses the book and Thomas Erikson. It has a section titled Is Erikson an authority in behavioural science? When he was looked up:  

 

“So, we used Ladok, the register of everyone who has studied at Swedish colleges and university, to see if we could find the courses taken by Erikson. There was no-one with his name and birthdate registered. In fact, Erikson’s professional background is in sales, first for the bank Nordea and then running his own business training salespeople. It is most likely that his only educational background is, at best, the Swedish equivalent of a high school diploma.”   

 

Lotten noted that Erikson was named Fraudster of the Year in 2018 by VoF and also added:

 

“He has as much right as my poodle to call himself a behavioural scientist.”

 

Erikson is quite glib as illustrated in a 12-minute YouTube video titled Red behavioural profile DISC | Dominant people | Surrounded by Idiots. But what he mostly says is Ipse Dixit – dogmatic expressions of opinion asserted without proof. I will ignore all of it. Think carefully before you accept any of it.

 

A jester statue was adapted from one at Wikimedia Commons.