Friday, January 31, 2025

Mickey’s Ten Commandments for design

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is lots of advice about storytelling and designing presentations. I found some excellent advice on page 12 of a book from 2015 by Disney construction developer Marty Sklar titled One Little Spark! – Mickey’s Ten Commandments and The Road to Imagineering, which also is previewed at Google Books. Those commandments are:

 

[ 1] KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE

Identify the prime audience for your attraction or show before you begin design.

 

[ 2] WEAR YOUR GUESTS’ SHOES

Insist that your team members experience your creation just the way guests do it.

 

[ 3] ORGANIZE THE FLOW OF PEOPLE AND IDEAS

Make sure there is a logic and sequence in your stories and in the way guests experience them.

 

[ 4] CREATE A WIENIE (VISUAL MAGNET)

Create visual ‘targets’ that lead visitors clearly and logically through the experience you’ve built.

 

[ 5] COMMUNICATE WITH VISUAL LITERACY

Make good use of color, shape, form, texture – all the nonverbal ways of communication.   

 

[ 6] AVOID OVERLOAD – CREATE TURN-ONS

Resist the temptation to overload your audience with too much information and too many objects.

 

[ 7] TELL ONE STORY AT A TIME

Stick to the story line; good stories are clear, logical, and consistent.

 

[ 8] AVOID CONTRADICTIONS – MAINTAIN IDENTITY

Details in design or content that contradict one another confuse an audience about your story and its time period.

 

[ 9] FOR EVERY OUNCE OF TREATMENT, PROVIDE A TON OF TREAT

In our business, Walt Disney said, you can educate people – but don’t tell them you’re doing it! Make it fun!

 

[10] KEEP IT UP (MAINTAIN IT)

In a Disney park or resort, everything must work. Poor maintenance is poor show!

 

There is more detailed advice in a book review by Andrew Everett at THE KEY POINT on May 1, 2016 titled One Little Spark, like:

 

[7] Tell One Story at a Time. ‘Good stories are clear, logical, and consistent… Storyboards are a must in our work, as a way to develop our story sequences. The objective is to create a story line that holds together from the first sketch to the last…A storyboard review can help reveal a key point or a weak character than can be reworked without tossing out all the good material the creators have developed.’ ”

 

This post was inspired by finding Mickey’s Ten Commandments mentioned by Bob Weis in his 2024 book Dream Chasing: my four decades of success and failure with Walt Disney Imagineering.

 


Wednesday, January 29, 2025

That salute by Elon Musk on January 20th


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gestures can have different meanings. They are not universal. Elon Musk learned that starting on January 20, 2025. There is a Wikipedia page titled Elon Musk gesture controversy which explains:

 

“After Donald Trump was officially sworn in as the president of the United States, Musk attended a celebratory rally at the Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., where he thanked the attendees for voting for Trump. Musk jumped onto the stage, started throwing his hands in the air, and then began to dance.

 

After he finished dancing, Musk placed his hand to his heart and extended his arm out above his head with his palm facing down, making a straight arm gesture. He then turned around and repeated the gesture to the audience behind him. He then said: ‘My heart goes out to you. It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured’ after he finished the gestures.”

 

An article by Tim Dickinson at the Rolling Stone on January 20, 2025 is titled Right-wing extremists are abuzz over Musk’s straight-arm salute. Another article by Jordan Liles at

Snopes on January 22, 2025 is titled Did Musk Give ‘Nazi Salute’ at Trump’s 2025 Inauguration Rally? Here’s What We Know. Jordan said:

 

“We cannot read Musk’s mind to learn precisely what he intended by it. It’s possible it was a purposeful Nazi salute; it could also have been entirely innocent. The available evidence is too scant to draw a solid conclusion.”

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another Wikipedia page titled Roman salute describes some history of how an arm gesture became a fascist and then a Nazi salute, as performed by German gymnasts at the 1936 Olympic Games (shown above).

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

But a very similar gesture regarding the U. S. flag (shown above) is described in another Wikipedia page titled Pledge of Allegiance. The section on salute describes how:

 

In 1892, Francis Bellamy created what was known as the Bellamy salute to accompany his own version of the Pledge of Allegiance. It started with the hand outstretched toward the flag, palm down, and ended with the palm up. Many decades later, during World War II, controversy arose because of the similarity between the Bellamy salute and the Nazi salute, which was adopted in Germany in the 1930s (although, unlike the Bellamy salute, this one did not end with the palm up). As a result, the US Congress stipulated that the hand-over-the-heart gesture would instead be rendered by civilians during the Pledge of Allegiance and the national anthem, thereby replacing the Bellamy salute. Removal of the Bellamy salute occurred on December 22, 1942, when Congress amended the Flag Code language first passed into law on June 22, 1942.”

 

Another gesture has two opposite meaning. A Wikipedia page about the Head shake says it can be used either to indicate rejection (many places) or to indicate approval (Southeastern Europe).

 

A Nazi saluting arm was adapted from an image at Wikimedia Commons. Images of the 1936 Olympics, and a 1942 Bellamy salute both came from the Library of Congress.

 


Monday, January 27, 2025

A great story about how Dick Goodwin wrote Lyndon Johnson’s We Shall Overcome speech on the same day the president delivered it

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On March 15, 1965 President B. Lyndon Johnson spoke to a joint session of Congress for 48 minutes. His speech on civil rights was noteworthy. An article by David Boeri at WBUR on March 14, 2014 discussed The Making of LBJ’s Historic ‘We Shall Overcome’ Speech. You can read the full text in an article at Presidential Rhetoric on March 15, 1965 simply titled We Shall Overcome. There is a CSpan video too.

 

In 2024 historian Doris Kearns Goodwin, who later was Dick Goodwin’s wife, published a book titled An Unfinished Love Story: A personal history of the 1960s. She has the following detailed account of how that speech was created (starting on page 224):

 

“Eventually everyone came around to what Johnson had wanted all along, a televised speech delivered before an extraordinary convening of a joint session of Congress that would allow him  simultaneously to address the Congress and the nation at large. Despite his awareness that a push for voting rights might disrupt his carefully designed production line for the Great Society, it was a risk he was willing to take.

 

Just as the conclusion of Johnson’s meeting with Wallace had hinged upon whether federal troops intervened or were invited into the state of Alabama, so now the president would not be circumventing Congress by appealing to the public directly on television. Instead, he would be accepting a formal invitation to the Hill. At the conclusion of this Cabinet Room meeting, the following statement was issued:

 

‘The Leadership of Congress this afternoon invited the President to address a joint session of the Congress on Monday evening to present the President’s views and outline of a voting rights bill and any other matters that the President desires to discuss.   

 

The President has accepted the invitation and will address a joint session at 9 p.m., Monday evening, March 15th in the House of Representatives.’

 

…. Now the clock was ticking. In about twenty-four hours, 535 members of the House and Senate, along with the nation, would be focused on the president and no speech had yet been drafted. It was like ‘deciding to climb Mt. Everest,’ said Lady Bird, ‘while you are sitting around a cozy family picnic.’

 

Dick spent that Sunday evening at a dinner party at historian Arthur Schlesinger’s home. As the party neared its end, the guests learned that the president was going to address a Joint Session of Congress the following night. Having heard nothing of these plans, Dick called the White House to see if any special messages had been left for him. No messages had been left.

 

‘I was perplexed and disappointed,’ Dick told me. ‘Someone else, I thought must be writing the speech. We had several more drinks, and decided to call it a night.’

 

MONDAY, MARCH 15, 1965

 

The moment Dick stepped into the West Wing on the morning of March 15, there was an unusual hubbub and tension. And there, pacing back and forth in a dither outside Dick’s second floor office, was Jack Valenti. Normally full of glossy good cheer, Valenti pounced on Dick before he could even open his office door. ‘He needs the speech from you, right away.’

 

‘From me! Why didn’t you tell me yesterday? I’ve lost the entire night,’ Dick responded.

 

‘It was a mistake, my mistake,’ Valenti acknowledged.

 

‘Poor Valenti was distraught,’ Dick told me. ‘Apparently, the first words out of the president’s mouth that morning were, ‘how’s Dick coming with the speech?’ When Valenti confessed that he had assigned the speech to Horace Busby, who was in the office the night before, Johnson exploded: ‘The Hell you did. Don’t you know that a liberal Jew has his hand on the pulse of America? Get Dick to do it and now!’

 

The overwrought Valenti handed Dick a folder from his conversations with the president the prior night as well as draft notes for a written message that would accompany the bill. The speech had to be finished before 6 p.m., Valenti told Dick, in order to be loaded on the teleprompter in advance of the president’s televised address. Valenti asked Dick if there was anything – anything at all – he could get for him.     

 

Dick told me he remembered giving Valenti a one word response, ’Serenity.’

 

‘Serenity?’ inquired the puzzled Valenti.

 

‘A globe of serenity,’ Dick replied. ‘I can’t be disturbed. If you want to know how it’s coming, ask my secretary.’

 

Dick looked at his watch. Nine hours away!

 

‘I didn’t want to think about time passing,’ Dick recalled to me. ‘I lit a cigar, looked at my watch, took the watch off my wrist and put it on the desk beside my typewriter. Another puff of my cigar and I took the watch and put it away in my desk drawer.’

 

‘The pressure would have short-circuited me,’ I said. ‘I never had the makings of a good speechwriter or journalist. History is more patient.’

 

‘Well,’ Dick laughed, ‘miss the speech deadline and those pages are only scraps of paper.’

 

Dick examined Valenti’s notes. Johnson wanted no uncertainty about where he stood. He wanted no argument about states’ rights versus federal rights, no blaming oppositions between South and North. To deny fellow Americans the right to vote was simply and unequivocally wrong. He wanted the speech to be affirmative and hopeful. He would be sending a bill to Congress to protect the fundamental right to vote for all Americans, and he wanted the speech to drive and speed public sentiment.  

 

In the year since Dick had started to work at the White House, he had listened to Johnson talk for hundreds of hours -on planes and in cars, during meals at the Executive Mansion and at the ranch, in the swimming pool and over late-night drinks. He understood Johnson’s deeply held convictions about civil rights. He knew the cadences of his speech. The speechwriter’s job, Dick explained, was to clarify, heighten, and polish the speaker’s convictions in the speaker’s own language and natural rhythms. If the words did not sound authentic to the speaker, the emotional current of the speech would not hit home.

 

I knew that Dick often searched for an arresting short sentence to begin every speech or article he wrote. On this day, he surely found it.

 

I speak tonight for the dignity of man and the destiny of democracy.

 

He then sought to situate this pivotal moment in the sweep of our nation’s history.  

 

At times, history and fate meet at a single time in a single place to shape a turning point in man’s unending search for freedom. So it was at Lexington and Concord. So it was a century ago at Apppomattox. So it was last week in Selma, Alabama.

 

‘The basic concept underlying the entire speech,’ Dick explained to me, ‘is that our government has been summoned, pushed by the people, and to that force and pressure, we will respond.’

 

There is no cause for pride in what has happened in Selma …. But there is cause for hope and for faith in our democracy in what is happening here tonight. For the cries of pain, and the hymns and protests of oppressed people – like some great trumpet – have summoned into convocation all the majesty of this government of the greatest nation on earth.

 

No sooner would Dick pull a page out of his typewriter and hand it to his secretary than Valenti would somehow materialize, a nerve-worn courier, eager to personally express pages from Dick’s secretary into the president’s anxious hands. Johnson’s edits and penciled notations were incorporated into the text while he awaited the next installment, lashing out at everyone within range – everyone except Dick.

 

It soon became clear that the speech was no lawyer’s brief debating the merits of the bill soon to be sent to Congress. Rather, it was a credo of what we are as a nation, and who we are as a people – a redefining moment in our history brought forth by the foot soldiers of the Civil Rights Movement.

 

The real hero of this struggle is the American Negro. His actions and protests, his courage to risk safety and even to risk his life, have awakened the conscience of this nation.

 

….He has called upon us to make good the promise of America. And who among us can say that we would have made the same progress were it not for his persistent bravery, and his faith in American democracy.

 

…. As the light shifted across the room, Dick became aware that the day suddenly seemed to be rushing by. He opened the desk drawer, peered at the face of his watch, took a deep breath, and quickly slammed the drawer shut. For the first time that day he walked outside to get air and refresh his mind.

 

…. Already the sun was beginning to set that chilly March evening when the phone in Dick’s office rang for the first time that day. It was after six o’clock, past the deadline to feed all the finished pages of the speech into the teleprompter. The voice at the other end was ‘so calm, sweet, and sedate’ that Dick hardly recognized it as the voice of the president of the United States.

 

‘Far and away,’ Dick told me, ‘the gentlest tones I ever heard from Lyndon.’

 

‘You remember, Dick,’ Johnson said in a whisper, ‘that one of my first jobs after college was teaching young Mexican Americans in Cotulla. I told you about that down at the Ranch. I thought you might want to put in a reference to that,’ Dick recalled Johnson telling him.

 

What Johnson impressed on him, Dick told me, was that those kids in Cotulla had nothing. They had a hard, hard life. ‘Hell,’ he told Dick, ‘I spent half my pay to buy sports equipment for the school.’

 

Not twenty minutes had passed when the phone rang a second time. In that second call, Dick told me, Johnson was still musing about his time in Cotulla. ‘It was a long time ago,’ he said, ‘but those kids have their own kids. And now we do something about it.’

 

Hardly four minutes passed ad the phone rang a third time. ‘I almost forgot, Dick, L’d like you to ride up to the Hill with me tonight.’

 

‘When I finished,’ Dick recalled, ‘I felt perfectly blank. It was done. It was beyond revision. It was dark outside and I checked my wrist to see what time it was, remembered I had hidden my watch away from my sight, retrieved it from the drawer, and put it back on.’  “ 

 

I got the book after seeing an article by David Murray at Pro Rhetoric on September 3, 2024 titled Doris Kearns-Goodwin’s account of her husband Dick Goodwin’s political speechwriting career is fascinating and touching, both.

    

A portrait of LBJ came from Wikimedia Commons.

 


Saturday, January 25, 2025

Seeing data using exploratory data analysis and histograms


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When I get bored, I play solitare – the online version from TheSolitaire.com. Recently I got curious about how much time and how many moves it was taking me to complete a game. What would the averages be? Would their shape just follow a Normal Distribution - the symmetrical bell curve shown above. It has roughly two thirds of the data (68.3%) in a range plus or minus one standard deviation from the mean.  

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Or would there instead be a skew distribution, as shown above? I did some exploratory data analysis. I kept track of a hundred games, and then used Microsoft Excel to plot histograms.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A histogram for time to complete is shown above. The mean time to complete was 208 seconds (3 minutes and 28 seconds) and the standard deviation was 27.6 seconds.  Columns in this histogram are twenty seconds wide. There are roughly two and a half to the left of the mean, but four and a half to the right.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another histogram, for the number of moves to complete, is shown above. The mean number of moves was 134 and the standard deviation was 12 moves. Columns in this histogram are ten moves wide. There are three to the left of the mean, but four to the right.  

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Both histograms have a positive skew. They are shaped like the slide on a children’s playground, as shown above via a cartoon.

 


Friday, January 24, 2025

A single-panel comic about replacing a motivational quote for your boss’s speech

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On January 23, 2025 there was a Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal comic by Zach Weinersmith titled You can make your boss’s speech more memorable by replacing their motivational quote with Richard II’s speech to the peasants at Waltham, 1381.

 

Always proofread your PowerPoint slides before you speak. If you had asked an employee to insert a quote, then instead of one from Wayne Gretzy like:

 

"You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.” or “Procrastination is one of the most common and deadliest of diseases and its toll on success and happiness is heavy.”

 

you might find:

 

“You wretches detestable on land and sea:

You who seek equality with lords are unworthy to live.

Give this message to your colleagues: rustics you were,

and rustics you are still: you will remain in bondage,

not as before, but incomparably harsher.

 

For as long as we live we will strive to repress you,

and your misery will be an example in the eyes of posterity.”

 

The image was adapted from this one at Openclipart.

 


Wednesday, January 22, 2025

An obvious lie early in Trump’s inauguration speech

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The seventh paragraph of Donald Trump’s inauguration speech contains an unnecessary and obvious ‘pants on fire’ lie (my italics):

 

“Our country can no longer deliver basic services in times of emergency, as recently shown by the wonderful people of North Carolina, who've been treated so badly. And other states who are still suffering from a hurricane that took place many months ago. Or more recently, Los Angeles, where we are watching fires still tragically burn from weeks ago without even a token of defense. They're raging through the houses and communities, even affecting some of the wealthiest and most powerful individuals in our country, some of whom are sitting here right now. They don't have a home any longer. That's interesting.”

 

Of course, there was much more than a token defense by Los Angeles County, which deployed thousands of firefighters who were hampered by high winds.

 

And nearby states each had responded to requests for help with more than a ‘token defense.’ An article by Christina Lords in the Idaho Capital Sun on January 9, 2025 was titled After receiving support during Idaho’s wildfire seasons, our firefighters are headed to California. We sent five task forces, 25 fire engines and 104 firefighters. A second article by Marvin Clemons in the Las Vegas Review Journal on January 8, 2025 was titled Nevada sending firefighters to help battle ‘one of the worst fires in history.’ They sent 50 engines and up to 125 firefighters. A third article by Stephen Howie at KUOW on January 10, 2025 was titled Hundreds of Washington firefighters sent to battle LA wildfires. Washington sent 45 fire engines and 280 firefighters. A fourth article by Joedy McCreary at USA Today on January 17, 2025 was titled No, California didn’t block fire trucks from Oregon over emissions rules | Fact check. Oregon sent 75 engines and 370 firefighters. Add those up and 195 engines and 879 firefighters came from elsewhere.

 

On January 19, a status report from the L.A. County Fire Department said:

 

Firefighting agencies from across the country are joining forces at the Rose Bowl, coordinating efforts and resources to battle the Eaton Fire. Currently, 2,703 personnel are on the ground, working tirelessly to provide essential support for our community.”

 

 And an article from Gavin Newsom on January 20, 2025 was titled Here’s all the actions Governor Newson has taken in response to the Los Angeles fires described the current state response:

 

“Governor Newsom has deployed 16,000+ personnel, including firefighters, California National Guard service members, highway patrol officers and transportation teams. These efforts are supported by the biggest state investment in fire response in history — nearly doubled since the beginning of the administration. Response efforts include more than 2,000 pieces of firefighting equipment, including 1,490+ engines, 80+ aircraft, 200+ dozers and 210+ water tenders to aid in putting out the fires.”

 

Trump’s cruel lying is both horribly pointless and pointlessly horrible. In 2021 Adam Server warned us with his book titled The Cruelty is the Point: The Past, Present, and Future of Trump’s America.

 

An image of the Palisades fire came from Wikimedia Commons.


 


Sunday, January 19, 2025

How old is the phrase ‘conspiracy theory’?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s a century older than you might think.

 

Between 11 PM and 3 AM I sometimes listen to the Coast-to-Coast AM radio show for entertainment rather than information. It’s a conversation piece for victims of insomnia. The January 17, 2025 show was titled Decoding Dreams/Conspiracy Culture. The webpage says:

 

“In the second half, David Samuels, the editor of County Highway, explored the rise of conspiracy theories in contemporary society and their detrimental effect on public trust. He pointed to the rumors swirling around during the COVID-19 pandemic as a prime example, remarking, ‘COVID did more to destroy public trust in institutions than any other single event of my lifetime.’

 

Samuels highlighted the stark decline in society’s trust in the media, mentioning that it had plummeted from over 50% to a mere 22%. He also insisted on having a critical mindset in today’s information-saturated world, stating, ‘You got to kind of question everything in this day and age.’

 

The conversation touched on the origin of the term ‘conspiracy theory.’ Samuels explained that its roots are found in the Warren Commission report following President Kennedy’s assassination. According to him, ‘This country is founded on a conspiracy theory,’ noting that the American revolution was sparked by the perceived tyranny of King George III.”  

 

Did ‘conspiracy theory’ really first come out in the 1964 Warren Commission report? I thought it might be much older, and looked up that phrase both in the EBSCOhost databases at my public library, and at Google Books.

 

At EBSCOhost I found an article by Howard J. Graham in the Yale Law Journal for 1938 (Volume 47, pages 371 to 403) titled The “Conspiracy Theory” of the Fourteenth Amendment.

 

At Google Books I found an 1881 book by James D. McCabe titled Our Martyred President: The Life and Public Services of Gen. James A. Garfield. On page 556 it specifically says that:

 

“There is more and more doubt of the conspiracy theory.”

 

What about another obvious source, which you would expect the show to have consulted?  The Wikipedia page on Conspiracy theory has a section on Origin and usage which points to a January 11, 1863 letter in The New York Times. And it also explains:

 

“Whether the CIA was responsible for popularising the term ‘conspiracy theory’ was analyzed by Michael Butter, a Professor of American Literary and Cultural History at the University of Tubingen. Butter wrote in 2020 that the CIA document Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report, which proponents of the theory use as evidence of CIA motive and intention, does not contain the phrase ‘conspiracy theory’ in the singular, and only uses the term ‘conspiracy theories’ once, in the sentence: ‘Conspiracy theories have frequently thrown suspicion on our organisation (sic) for example, by falsely alleging that Lee Harvey Oswald worked for us.’ “

 

The surprised cartoon came from Openclipart.

 


Saturday, January 18, 2025

How to Write Your Speech Outline

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Way back on July 5, 2009 I blogged about how there are Two types of speech outlines: speaking and preparation. The less well-known speaking outline is used when practicing your delivery.

 

The Sam M. Walton College of Business at the University of Arkansas has a three-page pdf article on Outlining Your Speech that discusses both types. Preparation outlines are written with full sentences; speaking outlines are written with key words. Main points are headed by Roman numerals, subpoints by Arabic numbers, and sub-sub-points by capital letters, etc.

 

A web page from the Purdue Online Writing Lab titled Four Main Components for Effective Outlines describes parallelism, coordination, subordination, and division. Parallelism means headings and subheadings should have parallel structure. Coordination means different headings should have the same significance. Subordination means that subheadings should be more specific and headings more general. Division means each heading should be divided into at least two parts.

 

On August 14, 2024 I blogged about Six ways to create an outline for your presentation.

 

My cartoon adapted a scroll from Openclipart.

 


Thursday, January 16, 2025

Eulogies at the funeral for President Jimmy Carter

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The funeral service for Jimmy Carter had lots of long and inspired eulogies. At PBS NewsHour there is a four hour and eighteen-minute video titled Funeral service for Jimmy Carter held at Washington National Cathedral. There is a second four-minute YouTube video titled WATCH: All 5 living former presidents gather to pay tribute to Carter | Carter Funeral. And there is a third seven-minute video titled WATCH: Key moments from Jimmy Carter’s official state funeral.

 

There is an eleven-minute video titled WATCH: Jimmy Carter established ‘model post-presidency,’ Biden says in eulogy. And there is another nine-minute video titled WATCH: Harris pays tribute to Jimmy Carter at U. S. Capitol memorial service.

 

An eight-minute homily is titled WATCH: Rev. Andrew Young remembers Jimmy Carter’s legacy pursuing equality. Note that Rev. Young did not mention that he was appointed as Ambassador to the United Nations in 1977. He kept the focus on Jimmy Carter.  

 

There is a fifteen-minute video titled WATCH: Gerald Ford’s son reads former president’s eulogy to Jimmy Carter | Carter Funeral. And there also is a nine-minute video by vice-president Walter Mondale, read by his son Steve titled WATCH: ‘Far-sighted’ Carter put presidency on the line for the future, Mondale wrote in eulogy.

 

A portrait of Carter as governor of Georgia was adapted from Wikimedia Commons.


Wednesday, January 15, 2025

Zero dark thirty and 25 (or 6) to 4


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some phrases are rather cryptic. For example, Zero Dark Thirty is 2012 political action thriller film directed by Kathryn Bigelow about the manhunt for Osama bin Laden. A Wikipedia page explains that title is:

 

“American military slang for an unspecified time between midnight and sunrise.”

 

There is another Wikipedia page about the Chicago song, 25 or 6 to 4 that was released as a single in June 1970. It was written by Robert Lamm, who said his cryptic title was telling about trying to write a song in the wee hours of the morning. There is an article by Jay McDowell at American Songwriter on February 1, 2024 titled The Mundane Meaning Behind “25 or 6 to 4” by Chicago. It is not about LSD (sometimes known as LSD-25), or heroin, or cocaine.

 

This post was inspired by my listening to the album, The Best of Chicago: 40th Anniversary Edition.

 


Tuesday, January 14, 2025

A claim that 77% of the world fears public speaking is just nonsense

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At AhaSlides on January 3, 2025 there is an article by Lawrence Haywood titled Fear of Public Speaking: 15 Tips to Beat Glossophobia in 2025. It begins:

 

“What is glossophobia?

 

Glossophobia – the fear of public speaking – is a kind of social anxiety disorder that prevents an individual from speaking in front of a group of people.

 

We can say with some conviction that you are a sufferer of the fear of public speaking.

 

How? Well, yes, because you’re reading this article, but also because all of the stats point to it. According to one European study, an estimated 77% of people could suffer from a fear of public speaking.

 

That’s over 3/4 of the world who are just like you when they’re in front of a crowd. They shake, blush and quiver on stage. Their hearts go a mile a minute and their voice cracks under the pressure of being the sole person tasked to get a message across.”  

 

Using a percentage from one European country to represent the world obviously is complete nonsense. And that article did very superficial research. It just linked to the abstract of an article by Alexandre Heeren et al. rather than the full text you can find or at PubMed Central. The first sentence of that article instead says that rather than their research in Belgium or Switzerland:

 

“About 77% of the general population fears public speaking. [Reference 1, to a 1999 article by T. Furmark et al. about Sweden]

 

Back on September 15, 2023 I blogged about how That zombie statistic that 77% of people fear public speaking in back – again. That post referred to an earlier, very similar article from AhaSlides. And it also referred to my blog post on October 12, 2020 titled Do 77% of Americans fear public speaking? No! That percentage described stage fright in Swedes who also had social anxiety disorder. Only 24% of the Swedish general population feared public speaking – about three times less.

 

That 24% is very similar to the percentages found for the U.S. in the ten Chapman Surveys of American Fears. I have presented those results (for the Very Afraid + Afraid fear levels) most recently in a December 5, 2024 blog post titled Psychotherapist Jonathan Berent fumbles some statistics about social anxiety and fear of public speaking. They were 25.3% for 2014, 27.5% for 2015, 25.5% for 2016, 23.3% for 2017, 26.2% for 2018, 31.2% for 2019, 29.0% for 2020/21, 24.0% for 2022, 28.7% for 2023, and 29.1% for 2024.

 


Monday, January 13, 2025

How to Write and Deliver a Eulogy


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is an excellent article by Chandler Dean at McSweeney’s Internet Tendency on May 22, 2024 titled How to Craft a Eulogy When All You Want to Do is Crawl in a Hole. He advises:

 

Ask yourself the big questions.

If you’re feeling stuck, don’t overthink it; start writing exactly what you’re feeling.

Once you have your thoughts on paper, you may now overthink it until it’s under five minutes.

You will never capture this person in their entirety. So do not try.

Don’t be afraid to be funny.

It may be hard to find the words. But avoid saying, ‘There are no words.’

 

There also is a post by Jennifer Calonia at the Grammarly blog on March 24, 2022 titled How to Write a Eulogy. She instead also discusses topics to avoid:

 

The reason for their death

Trivializing their death

Family grudges and disagreements

Unhealthy habits

Criminal history and other legal issues

Triggering memories

Criticisms about their life choices

Unresolved arguments

Their faults

 

Jens E. Kjeldsen is Professor of Rhetoric at the University of Bergen in Norway. He wrote another excellent article with four examples titled “My Father Is No Longer Here – the Rhetoric of Eulogy” which you can read on pages 3 to 6 in These Vital Speeches: The Best of the 2023 Cicero Speechwriting Awards.

 

And there is a great brief article by B. J. Miller and Shoshana Berger at IDEAS.TED.COM on July 23, 2019 titled How to give a eulogy that truly celebrates the person you’re honoring.


Toastmaster magazine has four brief articles about eulogies. One by Theodore Lustig in the December 2009 issue on page 12 is titled The Most Difficult Speech: The Eulogy. A second by Tammy A. Miller in the November 2020 issue on pages 20 and 21 is titled Delivering a Heartfelt Farewell. A third by Bill Brown In the December 2023 issue on page 9 is titled Saying Goodbye Isn’t Easy. A fourth by Caren S. Neile in the June 2024 issue on page 8 is titled An Unwanted Honor.

 

The image of Frank Bolden is from Wikimedia Commons.

 

 


Saturday, January 11, 2025

If you have an opportunity to join an established corporate Toastmasters club, then you should do so


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are two main types of Toastmasters clubs: community and corporate. Community clubs have open membership; corporate club membership is restricted to employees. Which type should you join if you are fortunate enough to have a choice? What are the advantages and disadvantages of those types?

 

A press release at PR Newswire on April 26, 2022 titled Fortune 500 Companies Seek Out Toastmasters for Developing Employees’ Soft Skills explains:

 

“While the workplace landscape has changed drastically in recent years, one thing remains constant: the value employers place on their employees having and continuing to develop effective soft skills. More than half of the 2021 Fortune 500 companies offer in-house Toastmasters clubs to help build and improve their employees' communication, leadership, and public speaking skills.

 

Apple, Amazon, Ford Motors, Exxon Mobil, General Electric, JPMorgan Chase, Northrop Grumman, Pfizer, State Farm Insurance, and UPS are among industry leaders using the Toastmasters International program to develop and enhance these valuable soft skills as well as the confidence of their employees.”

 

An article at Toastmaster magazine on February 2023 at pages 14 to 17 by Jennifer L. Blanck titled The Corporate Club Value Proposition: Stronger Than Ever discusses them. A second article by Caren S. Neile on September 2021 (pages 20 and 21) titled Toastmasters Works is subtitled How corporate clubs help both companies and employees. A third article by K. T. Lynn On September 2018 at pages 28 and 29 is titled Common Challenges of Corporate Clubs. A fourth article by Adriana Alxala at LinkedIn Pulse on March 31, 2017 is titled 3 Benefits of Having a Toastmaster Club in Your Office says they are:

 

1] The only meeting where being perfect isn’t required

2] Everybody has an opportunity to speak and lead in a safe place

3] Become friends of your coworkers

 

And a 1:44 YouTube video from Toastmasters International titled Dananjaya Hettiarachchi: Three Benefits of corporate Clubs says they are:

  

1} Helping management understand the art of saying something

2} It has identified specific competencies that are important for specific roles in       organizations

3} It gives your employees a safe space to talk about the ideas that they have in their minds

  ­­

A corporate club can be in a stable and convenient meeting place, where excellent visual aids already are set up for easy use. Contrast that with Pioneer Club, a community club in Boise I belong to, which has met successively at Idaho Pizza, Boise Public Library, Black Bear Diner, and Café Ole.

 

And in a corporate club you already know some fellow members. Perhaps one can become your mentor.

 

One disadvantage of a corporate club is a lack of diversity. For example, the corporate style for PowerPoint may not be up to date and heavy with bullet point lists. On February 19, 2014 I blogged about how Assertion-Evidence PowerPoint slides are a visual alternative to bullet point lists.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another potential disadvantage of a corporate club arises if there is not a large enough employee base to keep on providing new members. At least a couple hundred employees are needed to keep the typical 20 members. A corporate club can fade away only a few years after being formed. Here in Boise there are two very respected corporate clubs at very large employers: Russet Ramblers at Simplot - formed in 2007, and the Dynamic Club at Micron headquarters – formed in 2002. There once was a corporate club at Scentscy in Meridian, but it closed. In contrast, some community clubs survive for a very long time. Boise Club started in 1936 and Pioneer Club started in 1957.

 

Item 121 from Toastmasters International (August 2023) is a 19-page pdf document titled How to Build a Toastmasters Club. An article by Nibu Thomas at LinkedIn Pulse on November 15, 2021 is titled Moments of Truth – Corporate Toastmasters discusses start-up problems.

 

The cartoon was adapted from one at Openclipart.