Showing posts with label Toastmasters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Toastmasters. Show all posts

Friday, April 3, 2026

How to have a conversation with difficult people


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The cover for the April 2026 issue of Toastmaster magazine describes it as having Top Tips for Effective Conversations. There is a Featured Article by Jefferson Fisher on pages 14 to 17 that is titled How to Talk to Difficult People and subtitled Tips for handling people with challenging personality traits. He describes seven types and how to handle them:

 

The Insulter and Belittler

The Interrupter and Talker-Over

The Always-Has-To-Be-Right

The Passive Aggressor

The Gaslighter

The Narcissist

The One-Upper

 

Also, back on page 26 there is another article titled 5 Questions with Jefferson Fisher, which logically should have appeared right after it on page 18. It is not linked to under Related Articles though. You have to download the pdf file of this issue to find it. That is a very curious editorial omission.

 

On March 1, 2026 I blogged about how The Next Conversation is a thoughtful book by Jefferson Fisher.

 

The image of a 2017 BMW press conference was cropped from one by Matti Blume at Wikimedia Commons.

 

 

Saturday, March 7, 2026

Be aware of speakers and audience members with mobility challenges


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a useful post by Rich Hopkins at his Speak & Deliver blog on February 27, 2026 titled A Plea to Meeting Planners. He had his left leg amputated below the knee. Rich says to plan inclusively:

 

 “Ask speakers about mobility needs in advance - Ensure ramps are visible, safe, and easy to use - Provide seating options on stage - Reduce unnecessary distances when possible - Think about attendee navigation, not just speaker logistics.”

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As shown above, on stage there preferably should be a chair with arms rather than a high stool.

 

Rich made it to the semi-finals (top eighty) of the Toastmasters World Championship of Public Speaking seven times and the finals (top ten) three times, as was discussed in an article by Joe Rubino in the Broomfield Enterprise on August 17, 2011 titled Broomfield man aiming to be the roast of Toastmasters.

 

You can watch an 8-minute YouTube video of his speech titled What We Knew Then at Rich Hopkins 2006 Toastmasters World Championship of Public Speaking Third Place. (At 6 – 1 /2 minutes he sits down in a chair). And you can watch his Top Ten speech from 2008, Unthinkable.

 

Most of us don’t think much about mobility challenges either for speakers or the audience. I only did after I broke my fibula, which I blogged about on November 24, 2016 in a post titled What I’m thankful for today – recovering from a broken fibula.

 

There also is an article by Dane Cobain at speakerHUB on September 26, 2023 titled How to Make Your Public Speaking Events More Accessible.

 

Images of an amputee, a chair and a stool were adapted from Wikimedia Commons.

 

 

Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Botched statistics on fear of public speaking from an article in the March 2026 Toastmaster magazine


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is an article by social psychologist Jennifer Fidder on pages 10 and 11 of the March 2026 issue of Toastmaster magazine titled Fix Your Fear of Speaking. She begins with these three paragraphs:

 

“If you’re afraid of public speaking, have no fear – it’s one of the most common phobias. You’ve probably heard the saying that most people fear public speaking more than they fear death. And that’s true to an extent – nearly everyone has an impending fear of death; however, public speaking is something we all face having to do on a regular, even daily, basis.

 

Estimates suggest that around three-quarters of the general population report some level of anxiety about public speaking. An estimated 15 – 30% of them have a formal diagnosis of public speaking anxiety.

 

That fear of public speaking is called glossophobia, and it can prevent you from participating in activities, receiving promotions at work, and even being able to converse individually.”

 

Her first sentence mixes up fear and phobia. As shown above via a Venn Diagram, a phobia is a fear that also is intense, persistent and interfering. Back on December 11, 2013 I blogged about a previous article in a post titled Spouting Nonsense: July 2013 Toastmaster magazine article fumbles fears and phobias.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When we discuss fears and surveys, it is important to ask when a survey was done, where it was done, and what level(s) of fear were examined. We don’t need to hear stale old statistics again! There have been eleven Chapman Surveys of American Fears done from 2014 to 2025. They examined four levels of fear, as shown above via a bar chart for public speaking in the 2025 survey.  

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another bar chart looks at the fear of dying at any level (Very Afraid + Afraid + Slightly Afraid), which only applies to from 49.7% to 66.8% of us - with a mean of 60.5% or about 3 out of 5 of us, and is not anywhere near everyone. But fear of people I love dying (shown in a similar chart) ranges from 73.3% to 86.9% - with a mean of 82.1% or more than 4 out of 5 of us.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Still another bar chart looks at the fear of public speaking at any level - which ranges from 57.9% to 69.2% (with a mean of 63.0%) and quite a bit less than the three-quarters (75%) Jennifer claimed. Yet another bar chart shows the fear of public speaking for the levels of Very Afraid plus Afraid used in Chapman’s press releases (with a mean of just 28.5.%). Back on February 3, 2014 I blogged about Busting a myth – that 75% of people in the world fear public speaking. That ~75% (really 73%) came from back in 1977!

 

And the estimated 15 – 30% for public speaking anxiety appeared in a 2012 review article. I blogged about it in a post back on January 19, 2013 titled A recent review article on public speaking anxiety.

 

Also, Jennifer’s saying that most people fear public speaking more than they fear death is not right. There were two surveys long ago that instead found that more people (but less that 50% of them) feared public speaking than feared death. One was done in 1973, and I blogged about it on October 27, 2009 in the most popular post on this blog titled The 14 Worst Human Fears in 1977 Book of Lists: where did this data really come from? Another was discussed in a post on May 19, 2011 titled America’s Number One Fear: Public Speaking – that 1993 Bruskin-Goldring Survey

 

What about in the Chapman surveys? More people feared public speaking (at any level) than dying in 2015 (60.0% vs 49.7%), 2016 (60.2% vs 50.8%), 2017 (57.9% vs 55.0%), 2022 (69.2% vs 66.8%), 2023 (65.0% vs 59.8%), 2024 (65.75 vs 65.0%), and 2025 (68.5% vs 62.3%) while less did in 2018 (58.3% vs 64.4%), 2019 (64.1% vs 66.3%), and 2020/21 (61.7% vs 65.0%).

 

Finally, I don’t think it is useful to refer to the fear of public speaking by the word glossophobia. On May 6, 2022 I posted on Who popularized the word glossophobia? What is a better Plain English alternative? I suggested instead using the term speech fright, as a specific type of stage fright.

 

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Tips for tackling wordiness


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a brief article by Barbara Bashein on page 28 in the November 2019 Toastmaster magazine titled Shed the Dread of Business Writing. Her tips are to:

 

Eliminate wordiness. For example, change ‘at the present time’ to ‘currently’ or ‘now’.

 

Use clear and concise words. For example, change ‘utilize’ to ‘use.’

 

Use active rather than passive sentence structures. For example: ‘The team wrote the report,’ rather than ‘The report was written by the team.’

 

And there is a web page by Margaret Procter at University of Toronto: Writing Advice titled Wordiness: Danger Signals and Ways to React with tips about how to change:

 

Doubling of Words (choose one)

 

Intensifiers, Qualifiers (omit or give specific details)

 

Formulaic Phrases (use a one-word form or omit)

 

Catch-all Terms (can sometimes omit)

 

Padded Verbs (use a one-word form)

 

Unnecessary ‘to be’ and ‘being’ (omit)

 

Passive Verbs (change to active voice, if possible with a personal subject)

 

Overuse of Relative Structures (‘Who,’ ‘Which,’ ‘That’) (omit when possible)

 

And a four-page pdf article by Barb Every in Medical Writing magazine for March 2017, pages 17 to 20 (Volume 6, Number 1) is titled Writing economically in medicine and science: Tips for tackling wordiness. She says to avoid repetition, eliminate redundancy, and minimize purposeless words. Barb’s Table 1 on omitting redundant words is as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The cartoon was modifed from this one at OpenClipArt.

 

 

Monday, February 9, 2026

Watch out for different cultural styles!


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a good, brief article by Maria Garaitonandia on pages 26 and 27 in the February 2026 issue of Toastmaster magazine titled Untangling cultural knots and subtitled How to turn misunderstandings into bridges between cultures. Also there is a 32-minute Toastmasters Podcast (on YouTube) with Bo Bennett titled #292 Untangling Cultural Knots to Create Mutual Connection – Maria Garaitonandia.

 

Maria talks about two different cultural types that focus on either relationships or tasks. She begins with an example of Mexican executive Pedro and his American colleague Owen in her second and third paragraphs:

 

“When an urgent matter needed Owen’s sign-off, Pedro hurried to his office, only to find him on the phone. Pedro peeked in, but Owen didn’t acknowledge him, so he walked in and interrupted Owen by signaling with his hand.

 

Taken aback, Owen interrupted his conversation and said to Pedro, ‘Can’t you see I’m on the phone?’ Pedro apologized and tried to explain, but Owen interrupted him and said, ‘When I’m finished, I’ll take care of it,’ and promptly turned his back on Pedro.”

 

Then Maria talks about cultures focused either on relationships or tasks. In cultures focused on relationships (like Brazil, Mexico or in the Middle East) trust and loyalty are the priorities. Communication is contextual and layered. Being attentive and available shows respect. In cultures focused on tasks (like Germany Switzerland or the United States) efficiency and results. Communication is direct, concise, and explicit. Following schedules and procedures shows respect. These differences are summarized above via my PowerPoint table based on her discussion. I think a similar table would have been a useful addition to the article, but could have been left out due to squeezing it into just two pages.

 

Of course, if we were doing a speech that table better would be a build with the following four PowerPoint slides – adding the new information in green and graying out the previous information:

 




 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saturday, February 7, 2026

You can get writing prompts from The Amazing Story Generator flipbook


 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On December 15, 2020 I blogged about Using writing prompts to get unstuck. And on November 12, 2022 I blogged about how Writing prompts also can be used for Table Topics questions.

 

There is a useful 2012 spiral-bound flipbook by Jason Sacher titled The Amazing Story Generator: Creates Thousands of Writing Prompts and subtitled Mix-and-match creative writing prompts. As shown above, there are three phrases which can be separately flipped to assemble a single sentence writing prompt. I got a copy from the juvenile section at the main Boise Public Library downtown.

 

The book was discussed in a brief article at CreativTeach on January 14, 2015 titled The Amazing Story Generator: It’s Actually Amazing. And there is a nine-minute YouTube video from N. V. Rivera on March 13, 2020 titled Writing Prompt 11 The Amazing Story Generator.

 

 

Friday, January 16, 2026

Dinner Talk is a book of 365 useful conversation starters (Table Topics questions)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On November 21, 2022 I blogged about how Conversation Starters can also be used for Table Topics questions. Then, on January 3, 2026, I blogged about 135 Conversation Starters (or Table Topics Questions) from the Family Dinner Project.

 

Via interlibrary loan, from the Twin Falls Public Library I obtained a useful book from 2010 by Emily Hall, Philip S. Hall, and Nancy D. Hall titled Dinner Talk: 365 Engaging Conversation Starters to help you and your family connect. It also is subtitled that THERE’S MORE TO SAY THAN JUST “please pass the salt.” There is a Google Books preview. Along with each starter there is a paragraph on What to Expect. For example, Number 209 is How would you describe yourself in five words or less? and What to Expect is:

 

“Expect your children to describe themselves with five positive words that tell about their physical characteristics and attributes like strong, fast, tall, skinny, etc., because these are the characteristics that children are most focused on -the physical and visual. They are most tuned into how people look and haven’t yet learned to be as aware of inner characteristics, at least not in ways they can verbalize quickly. Adolescents will describe themselves in five words that tell how they hope they are perceived by their peers: cool, hip, smart, nice, etc. The adults at the table will describe themselves in five words that tell about their core values: honest, dependable, industrious, etc.” 

 

A dinner of red beans and rice came from Wikimedia Commons.

 

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

A 2011 book by Bryan Cohen with 1,000 Creative Writing Prompts



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table Topics is the impromptu speaking section in a Toastmasters club meeting where members provide one-to-two-minute answers to questions. On November 12, 2022 I blogged about how Writing prompts can also be used for Table Topics questions.

 

At the Garden City Public Library I found a 120-page book from 2011 by Bryan Cohen titled 1,000 Creative Writing Prompts: Ideas for blogs, scripts, stories and more. His thirteen categories are:

 

Holidays

Seasons

Memories

Life

Health

For the Kids

Literature and Genre

Art

Sports

The Outdoors

The Modern World

The Weird

General

 

The writing hand cartoon was adapted from OpenClipArt.  

 

Monday, January 5, 2026

An e-book with over 900 Story Prompts (aka Table Topics Questions) for Nonprofits


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On May 15, 2024 I blogged about My workshop presentation at the 2024 District 15 Toastmasters Conference on May 18, 2024 about Creating or Finding Great Table Topics Questions. Story Prompts are one type of question.

 

There is a 56-page pdf e-book by Chris Davenport from 2023 titled Story Prompts for Nonprofits: 900+ storytelling prompts for attracting new donors, generating media buzz, connecting with your community, and deepening relationships with donors!

 

One large series of Story Prompts for Different Categories of Nonprofits with twenty for each of the following 17 categories [340] is:

 

Advocating

Animals

Arts

Children’s Hospital

Community Foundation

Dog and Cat Shelters

Environmental

Foreign Aid

Healthcare

Higher Education

Independent Schools

K-12 Schools

Museums and History

Political 

Religious

Social Services

Theater

 

Another large series of Story Prompts Based on Types of Beneficiaries and Help Provided with twenty for each of the following 29 categories [580; 580 + 340 = 920] is:

 

Cancer

Clean Water

Climate Change

Community Service

Disabled

Domestic Violence

Drug and Alcohol Addiction

Families in Need

Feeding the Hungry

Holiday Season

Homeless

Human Services

Job Provider

Land Conservation

Legal Aid

Low-Income Housing

Medical Device Provider

Music Programs

Political Action

Research

Scholarship Programs

Senior citizens

Sports

Technology Provider

Therapy

Transportation Services

Veterans

World Events

 

The image was modified from this one at OpenClipArt.


 

Saturday, January 3, 2026

135 Conversation Starters (or Table Topics Questions) from the Family Dinner Project


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back on November 21, 2022 I blogged about how Conversation Starters can also be used for Table Topics questions at a Toastmasters club meeting.

 

There is a web site called the Family Dinner Project that has a 6-page pdf article from 2020 listing 135 Conversation Starters. The first dozen questions are:

 

  1] What’s something you couldn’t do when you were younger that you can do now?

 

  2] If you had superpowers, what would they be and how would you use them to help people?

 

  3] What’s one fun thing you hope to do in the next year?

 

  4] Who is your favorite character from a book, movie, or TV show?

 

  5] If you could be an animal, what would you want to be? Why?

 

  6] If you could live anywhere in the world, where would you want to live? Why?

 

  7] If you could have a character from a book or movie as a best friend, who would it be? Why?

 

  8] What are three things you’re good at doing that took a lot of hard work and practice?

 

  9] What’s the greatest song ever written and why?

 

10] Do you have a favorite piece of clothing? What makes it special?

 

11] What is your favorite season? What do you like about it?

 

12] If you were a season, which season would you be and why?

 

There also is a post from Bri DeRosa at The Family Dinner Project blog on August 29, 2023 titled 100 Ways to Ask About the Day.

 

I found out about the Family Dinner Project from page 146 in a 2024 book by Michael Norton titled The Ritual Effect: From habit to ritual, harness the surprising power of everyday actions.

 

An image of a dinner table in Kew Palace came from Wikimedia Commons.

 

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Get speechwriting help by talking to a rubber duck


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The November 2025 issue of Toastmaster magazine has an article by Ben Guttmann on page 6 about speechwriting titled Talk It Out and subtitled How explaining a problem to a rubber duck leads to solutions. He has a quotation from a paragraph on page 95 of the 1999 book The Pragmatic Programmer by Andrew Hunt and David Thomas:

“A very simple but particularly useful technique for finding the cause of a problem is simply to explain it to someone else. The other person should look over your shoulder at the screen, and nod his or her head constantly (like a rubber duck bobbing up and down in a bathtub). They do not need to say a word; the simple act of explaining, step by step, what the code is supposed to do often causes the problem to leap off the screen and announce itself.”

 The following paragraph (not included in Ben’s magazine article) adds further:

 “It sounds simple, but in explaining the problem to another person you must explicitly state things that you may take for granted when going through the code yourself. By having to verbalize some of these assumptions, you may suddenly gain new insight into the problem.”

 There also is a Wikipedia article titled Rubber duck debugging. And there is an article by Scott Hanselman on December 10, 2020 titled The Art of Rubber Ducking or Rubber Duck Debugging which describes how:

 “You'll find that getting the problem outside your head, via your mouth, and then back into your ears is often enough to shake brain cells loose and help you solve the issue.

 Rubber Ducking also is great practice in technical communication! Have you ever given a technical talk? There's actually not much distance between explaining a technical issue clearly, correctly, and concisely and giving a talk at a user group or conference!”

 Another article by Max Florschutz at UNUSUAL THINGS on June 14, 2021 is titled Being a Better Writer: The Rubber Duck. Still another article by Charlie Rapple at The SCHOLARLY kitchen for April 24, 2025 is titled Rubber Ducking for Research Communication: Why Explaining to Nobody Helps You Explain to Anybody.

 

 

Saturday, October 18, 2025

15 excellent Table Topics questions from the end of a 2024 book by Jennifer McGaha titled The Joy Document

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table Topics is an impromptu speaking section in a Toastmasters club meeting. Members (and perhaps guests) are asked a question and then answer it via a one-to-two minute off-the-cuff speech.    

 

I have been skimming through a 198-page book from 2024 by Jennifer McGaha titled The Joy Document: Creating a Midlife of Surprise and Delight. There is a Google Books preview ending on page 13. At the end, on pages 195 and 196, there is a section titled Guiding Questions: Creating Your Own Joy Document. These are writing prompts or Table Topics questions. The second paragraph begins:

 

"….Finding joy is a lot like that – a waiting game. A watching game. A smidgeon-of-this-and-a-sprinkling-of-that game. Still, you have to start somewhere, so below are some questions designed to help you begin your own Joy Document. Of course, this is not an exhaustive list of questions to consider, but perhaps these can serve as starting points. And who knows? You may begin with something small, a song you love, a saying you find intriguing, an awkward interaction with a man on a trail or at a produce stand or along a canal, and one joyful moment will inspire another and another until you have a whole Joy Dissertation, a Joy Treatise, a Joy Manifesto, a Joy Declaration.

 

Feast for a moment on that.

 

  1] What song(s) do you associate with pivotal times in your life, and why?

 

  2] Think about a favorite family recipe. Whom do you associate with the recipe? What events? What feelings? When do you make this food? Have you changed the recipe at all from the original? Why or why not?

 

  3] When in your life has a surprise risen to the level of a surprisement?

 

  4] Consider a time when an encounter with someone else caused you to think more deeply about a social/cultural/political issue that matters to you.

 

  5] Discuss a strange/awkward/unexpected interaction with a stranger that led you to consider something in a new way.

 

  6] In what way have your beliefs served as a source of joy/comfort for you?

 

  7] Point to a moment when something you once deeply believed changed irrevocably.

 

  8] How have your interactions with animals and/or the natural world shaped what you believe?

 

  9] Discuss a time when you learned something you didn’t know you needed to learn.

 

10] Discuss a time when you said literally or in spirit) ‘fuck it’ to something, when you let go of something that was interfering with your happiness.

 

11] Discuss a time when you took a chance you’re now glad you took.

 

12] What are some stories you have told yourself about your life that might not be fully true? How might revising those stories change you?

 

13] If you considered your body a sacred space, how might that change how you move in the world?

 

14] What big questions seem most pressing to you in this season of your life? What is it you most want to know?

 

15] In what way might wondering (the verb – i.e., wanting to know something) lead to wonder (the noun – i.e., a sense of awe)?"

 

If you are wondering what a surprisement is (Question 3), that is explained in the first paragraph of the 21st essay, Suprisement, beginning on page 77:

 

 “One evening, READING a student essay, I came across the phrase ‘much to my surprisement,’ which naturally surprised me, what with grammar-check and spell-check and all, but the more I thought about it, the more I came to appreciate the writer’s intent. After all, surprise is akin to amaze and astonish and bewilder and excite and wonder, all which could be amended with ‘ment’ to indicate not just a transitory sensation or static thing but a whole state of being. Why should surprise be any different? The more I considered it, the more sense it made, and the more sense it made, the more shortsighted my blue-inked circle around the word appeared.”

 

The cartoon was adapted from one at OpenClipArt.

 

 

Friday, October 10, 2025

Is nobody afraid of public speaking?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On August 31, 2025 I blogged about a dogmatic claim that everyone fears public speaking in a contrary post titled Not everyone fears public speaking. The opposite and equally silly claim has turned up in a five-minute YouTube video by Jim Cathcart on October 8, 2025 titled Nobody Is Afraid Of Public Speaking. He mentioned:

 

“It’s widely known that public speaking is the greatest fear in the world. That comes from a study that was done in the 1980s or 1990s and it ranked public speaking as the number one fear but it was a limited study and it said that public speaking was feared more than death itself. But that’s not a scientific fact. That has not been statistically validated.

 

But the point that I’m making is that those people who say that they’re afraid of public speaking are not afraid of public speaking. They’re just not. They’re afraid of being judged. Right?”

 

Back on May 19, 2011 I blogged about America’s Number One Fear: Public Speaking – that 1993 Bruskin-Goldring Survey. Jim didn’t mention any survey showing no one feared public speaking.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lots of people have no problem with being judged: they participate in speech contests, like the series with 30,000 people held by Toastmasters International starting at clubs and leading all the way up from Area, to Division, to District, to Region, and their World Championship. Page 30 of the March 2001 Toastmaster magazine describes that Mr. Cathcart would receive the Golden Gavel award from Toastmasters in August 2001.  

 

Silhouettes of a podium and a judge both were adapted from OpenClipArt.  

 

Tuesday, October 7, 2025

Surrounded by bad books from Thomas Erikson

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back on February 4, 2020 I blogged about how The Toastmasters Pathways Level 2 project on Understanding Your Communication Style says there are four communication styles. Where did they come from? In that post I discussed the DISC model from William Moulton Marston (Dominance – Influence – Steadiness – Compliance). I mentioned that a popular Swedish book from 2018 by Thomas Erikson, titled Surrounded by Idiots had restated those four categories as colors. Now there is a new 2025, fully revised and expanded edition of that bookSurrounded by Idiots: The four types of human behavior and how to effectively communicate with each in business (and in life). There is a preview at Google Books. He very briefly mentions the DISC model. But finally on pages 333 to 335 there is a short reflection on its history.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On page 37 of the book (and a color version at the inside front cover) there is a four-column table with Different Characteristics per Color, as shown above. The second row has wording for DISC, but there is no explanatory column at the left. Then, on pages 38 to 40, there is another excruciatingly long table listing Characteristic Traits with thirty rows that does include an explanatory column.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And on page 100 there is a 2x2 table (as shown above) with those four types. [He didn’t show the words for DISC, but I have added them].

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, in Chapter 22 beginning on page 251 Thomas discussed The Most Common Combinations of two colors, as I have shown above in another table.

 

The book jacket claims that:

 

“Thomas Erikson is a Swedish behaviorist and the bestselling author of the Surrounded By books, a series about human behavior and communication. The series, including Surrounded by Idiots, has sold more than ten million copies in 70 languages.”  

 

A half-dozen other books in the series are (in chronological order):

 

2020

Surrounded by Psychopaths: How to protect yourself from being manipulated and exploited inbusiness (and in life)

 

2021

Surrounded by Bad Bosses (and Lazy Employees): How to stop struggling, start succeeding,and deal with idiots at work

 

2021

Surrounded by Setbacks: Turning obstacles into success (when everything goes to hell)

 

2022

Surrounded by Narcissists: How to effectively recognize, avoid, and defend yourselfagainst toxic people (and not lose your mind)

 

2023

Surrounded by Energy Vampires: How to slay the time, joy, and soul suckers in your life

 

2024

Surrounded by Liars: How to stop half-truths, deception, and gaslighting from ruining yourlife

 

A post at Reddit pointedly asked Has it occurred to Thomas that he might be the problem?

 

Thomas did not bother to add information from his other books to his latest revised one about Idiots. I found at the public library and skimmed all his others except the Energy Vampires one. Here are excerpts from some of them.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 54 of the Psychopaths book has a better 2x2 table (as shown above) with those four DISC types.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And pages 78 and 79 of his Setbacks book has a better table with a description of the four colors (as shown above). Thomas did not bother to repeat those two improved graphics in the revised Idiots book.   

 

Similarly, there is a better Description of DISC on pages 82 and 83 of Surrounded by Psychopaths:

 

The DISC Model

 

Not everything in an individual’s behavior can be explained by the DISC model.

 

There are other models that explain behavior, but I use this as the basis because it is simple to digest and teach. There are more parts of the puzzle than the colors to map various behavior patterns.

 

The DISC model is based on thorough studies and is used throughout the world. It has been translated into more than fifty different languages.

 

Historically, there are similar views in different cultures – for example the four humors described by Hippocrates, who lived in Greece about 2,500 years ago.

 

About 80 percent of all people have a combination of two colors that dominate their behavior. Approximately 5 percent have only one color that dominates behavior. The others [15 percent] are dominated by three colors.

 

Entirely Green behavior, or Green in combination with one other color, is the most common. The least common is entirely Red behavior, or Red in combination with one other color.

 

There may be differences between the sexes, but I do not deal with the gender perspective in this book.

 

The DISC model does not work for analysing people with ADHD, Asperger’s borderline personality disorder, or other disorders.

 

There are always exceptions to what I claim in this book. People are complex – even Red people can be humble, and Yellows can listen attentively. There are Green people who deal with conflict because they have learned what to do, and many Blues understand when it’s time to stop fact-checking. Problems in communication arise when people lack self-awareness.

 

My own colors are Red and Blue and a bit of Yellow. No Green to speak of. Sorry.”

 

An article edited by Lotten Kalenius from the Swedish Skeptics Association (VoF) on April 15, 2024 is titled One of Sweden’s biggest scientific bluffs which discusses the book and Thomas Erikson. It has a section titled Is Erikson an authority in behavioural science? When he was looked up:  

 

“So, we used Ladok, the register of everyone who has studied at Swedish colleges and university, to see if we could find the courses taken by Erikson. There was no-one with his name and birthdate registered. In fact, Erikson’s professional background is in sales, first for the bank Nordea and then running his own business training salespeople. It is most likely that his only educational background is, at best, the Swedish equivalent of a high school diploma.”   

 

Lotten noted that Erikson was named Fraudster of the Year in 2018 by VoF and also added:

 

“He has as much right as my poodle to call himself a behavioural scientist.”

 

Erikson is quite glib as illustrated in a 12-minute YouTube video titled Red behavioural profile DISC | Dominant people | Surrounded by Idiots. But what he mostly says is Ipse Dixit – dogmatic expressions of opinion asserted without proof. I will ignore all of it. Think carefully before you accept any of it.

 

A jester statue was adapted from one at Wikimedia Commons.