Tuesday, June 17, 2025

An amusing xkcd cartoon about types of bridges


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Randal Munroe’s xkcd cartoon for June 2, 2025 is titled Bridge Types. As shown above, it has sixteen of them, which are discussed over at Explain xkcd. Some make good sense: truss, arch, suspended arch, and suspension. The fifteenth is labeled as fun and it has a loop in the center.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But the idea of a double loop as part of a scenic railway (roller coaster) was used almost twelve decades ago in a Puck cartoon titled Pity the Poor Brooklynite, as is shown above. It came from page 5 of the October 24, 1906 issue of that magazine!

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is another Puck cartoon (shown above) from page 3 of March 7, 1906 with a bridge alternative titled The Brooklyn Strapid Transit System.

 

 

Monday, June 16, 2025

Memorable prop handouts for your speech audience from a dollar store


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have been skimming through a 2004 book by Robert V. Smith titled The Elements of Great Speechmaking: Adding drama and intrigue. On page 71 in a section titled Artifacts and Props his second paragraph says:

 

“You have likely been to meetings – especially lunches and dinners associated with professional gatherings – where the host organization provides a small gift -be it a lapel pin or something of greater worth. Have you noticed how many people can’t keep their hands off of the gift during the subsequent event. The gift becomes a type of talisman – a connection object. Now imagine that you plan such a scenario, only using an object of your own choosing – an object that ties into a message that you wish to imbue in the minds of audience members (see figure 9.4). This can work like magic.”

 

For example, for a speech about marketing or personal branding and the need to always blow your own horn, as shown above, you might hand out little plastic horns (at the dollar store a pack of six is just $1.25).

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Or you might discuss how preparing great slides is like having a magic wand – and hand out pocket-sized wands, as shown above.

 

 

Sunday, June 15, 2025

Pearls Before Swine cartoon about navigating with maps or atlases


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When traveling, I currently navigate using Apple Maps on my iPhone, or my Garmin GPS. 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But when I fly somewhere, I take along an AAA map (shown above) as a backup. 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And when I drive around a state, I carry a road atlas (as shown above). With it open on my lap I can keep track of exactly where I am, and turn off when traffic is blocked up ahead.

 

On June 1, 2025 Stephan Pastis has a Pearls Before Swine cartoon with dialogue about how we previously used maps:

 

Stephan:

 Well, I had all of these fold-out maps in the trunk.

 And a bound book of maps called a ‘Thomas Guide.’

 And if it was an unfamiliar city I got free maps at the AAA office.

 Then the person in the passenger seat would look at them and try to tell you which way to go.

 And if all that failed you could ask for help from a gas station service attendant…

 I see a question.

 

Young girl: My friends and I were wondering if you had electricity back then.

 

Stephan: Yes. We had electricity you @*#@!

 

Goat: And that’s why I don’t talk to young people.

 

Rat: Now explain Blockbuster video stores!

 

 

Friday, June 13, 2025

The Four Part Close for a speech is also known as “The Lehrman Landing”


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

My previous post on June 11, 2025 titled Kairos is a Greek word about timing that speechwriters should know linked to an article by David Murray at Pro Rhetoric on May 25, 2023 titled “The Lehrman Landing” – and Other Jargon Speechwriters Should Use Constantly.

 

How does David describe The Lehrman Landing? He says:

 

“This is a term we’re trying to popularize ourselves – renaming of the ‘Four Part Close,’ a type of elaborate and effective speech conclusion that speechwriter Robert Lehrman has been teaching since he learned it himself, under the tutelage of Kurt Vonnegut at the University of Iowa in about 1967. Don’t you think Bob deserves to have it named after him?”

 

But what’s in it, and is there a great example of this ending? There indeed is one in Robert A. Lehrman’s 2010 book, The Political Speechwriter’s Companion: A guide for writers and speakers, in his section on THE FOUR-PART CLOSE beginning on page 203. He talks about the Inspirational Example, the Lesson Drawn, the Call to Action, and the Clincher:

 

“Kennedy’s inaugural speech – along with King’s – has been analyzed in great detail. Here we look only at the conclusion, as full of famous lines as a Shakespearean soliloquy.

 

Sorenson’s conclusion clearly relies on the devices of language we reviewed earlier, especially litany and antithesis. And like King’s [I Have a Dream], it follows the four-part structure so useful for speech, which seeks to inspire an audience to act. Read through this annotated version to see how they fit together. Then listen to it, using the link on page 205.

 

INSPIRATIONAL EXAMPLE

 

It might be a quote, story, series of examples, montage, or poem. Often taken from history, an inspirational example might feature sacrifice, or someone succeeding against odds. As Kennedy’s example of sacrifice, Sorensen chose the graves of American soldiers to remind the audience that other generations fought to keep America free [my italics]:

 

Since the country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.  

 

LESSON DRAWN

 

Having moved the audience, speakers draw a lesson from it – an analogy, making the example relevant for today. Sometimes the lesson may mean you should imitate the example. (What they did we can do!) Sometimes speakers will pose a question or paint two views of the future, thus creating a moment of suspense. (Will we choose correctly?)

 

Kennedy’s lesson: We must act like those brave ‘young Americans.’ The ‘trumpet’ that summons them, he says, summons us to ‘defend freedom.’ Note how this step intertwines with Monroe. Kennedy asks his listeners if they will join them (but doesn’t urge – that comes later). Then he outlines a vision of the success that can – not will – happen if they do. [Italics mine]

 

Now the trumpet summons us again. Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join me in that historic effort?

 

In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger.

 

The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it – and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

 

CALL TO ACTION

 

What next? As Monroe suggests, don’t let your audience off the hook Make the sale. What is it you want your audience to do? Having asked if they will join him, Kennedy launches into a third step, a call-to-action litany appealing to what alert or obsessive readers will remember formed the highest step in Maslow’s pyramid: self-fulfillment. [My italics]

 

And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.

 

My fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man ….

 

Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you.

 

Could he end there? It would seem abrupt. And so this four-part close involves a final step – the very last line.

 

CLINCHER

 

Clinchers usually remind listeners of the larger implications of their actions. By now speakers have moved beyond the mundane issues of which bills to pass or which candidates to support. They end by urging audiences to take action because that action will bring a noble end. And what is that noble end? Often it’s freedom, the American dream, a better future for our children, or some other abstraction Americans value. Kennedy’s is unusual – he promises only one ‘sure reward’ [italics mine]

 

With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking his blessing and his help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.

 

The language of Kennedy’s clincher is less concrete than other sections, and more hackneyed (‘the land we love’). Kennedy is careful to hew to the prerequisite of important political speeches by invoking God, which he refers to as a male. But his final sentence remains unusual in political life for three things he doesn’t do. Kennedy doesn’t promise success.  He doesn’t assure his audience of the rightness of their actions, since ‘history’ is the final judge. And while invoking God, he doesn’t simply say what has become the fashion today (God bless you, and God bless America!). Instead, he takes sides in one of the great debates of contemporary religion, reminding his listeners that good works, not just faith, will save them.

 

But by inverting the usual grammatical structure to create suspense, by using alliteration, repetition, and antithesis, his clincher surprises his audience, becomes memorable, and justifies its position as Kennedy’s final sentence.”

 

I quoted from the first edition of Lehrman’s book because I could find it at the Boise State University library. There is a second edition in 2019 with Eric L. Schnure as the co-author. The book grew from 362 pages to 536 pages.

 

The image was modified from this jigsaw puzzle at OpenClipArt.

 

 

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Kairos is a Greek word about timing that speechwriters should know

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I recently ran across an article by David Murray at Pro Rhetoric on May 25, 2023 titled “The Lehrman Landing” – and Other Jargon Speechwriters Should Use Constantly. One term is Kairos:

 

Kairos: Often forgotten as an element as important as logos, pathos and ethos, Kairos refers to the timeliness of an argument, or more broadly to the ‘moment’ in which any communication occurs. The Gettysburg Address would not have gone over big at a supermarket opening in 1975.”

 

There is another article by Jennifer Calonia at Grammarly on February 1, 2024 titled What is Kairos: History, Definition, and Examples. And there is a web page by Gideon O. Burton at

Silva Rhetoricae on Kairos. Also John Zimmer at Manner of Speaking on July 27, 2022 has an article titled Kairos: The foundation of rhetoric that explains:

 

“The ancient Greeks had two words for ‘time’. The first was ‘chronos’ (χρόνος), which referred to chronological time. Words like ‘chronological’ and ‘chronology’ come from chronos. The second was ‘kairos’ (καιρός), which means the right moment or opportunity. It is this second meaning which is of supreme importance when it comes to public speaking.”

 

The clock was adapted from an image at OpenClipArt.

 

 

Monday, June 9, 2025

Plagiarism and speechwriting


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary says that to plagiarize is:

 

“to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own; use (another’s production) without crediting the source.”

 

An article by Lindsay Kramer at Grammarly on June 2, 2022 titled 7 Common Types of Plagiarism, With Examples says those types are: accidental, complete, direct, paraphrasing, patchwork, self, and source-based.

 

There is a brief, useful article by Jesse Scinto on pages 14 and 15 of the March 2017 Toastmaster Magazine titled What is Plagiarism and How Can You Avoid It?

 

Some university libraries have guides for their courses on public speaking including plagiarism. For example, there is one by Amy Windham of Pepperdine University which is a Learning and Research Guide – COM 180 Public speaking & Rhetorical Analysis titled What is Plagiarism? And at the University of Southern California there is a Research Guide – Com 204 Public Speaking:Plagiarism. A more detailed guide is a six-page pdf from University of Missouri – St. Louis titled Avoiding Plagiarism. Back on February 24, 2015 I blogged about How to do a better job of speech research than the average Toastmaster (by using your friendly local and state university libraries).

 

There also is another article by Dane Cobain at Speakerhub on August 30, 2022 titled How Public Speakers Can Avoid Plagiarism with the following paragraph titles:

 

Don’t plagiarize

Use a plagiarism checker

Give credit where credit is due

Create original ideas

Run your idea past someone

Google your topics

Ask for permission

Use exact match searches

Plan what you’re going to say

Ask for feedback

 

And the 2018 open-source textbook by Lori and Mark Halverson-Wente titled The Public Speaking Resource Project has Chapter 26 about Avoiding Plagiarism.

 

For an excellent example of what to avoid, look at yet another article from Jonathan Bailey at Plagiarism Today on July 19, 2016 titled The Melania Trump Plagiarism Scandal. Her Republican National Convention speech copied one by Michelle Obama.

 

The cartoon burglar was adapted from OpenClipArt.

 

 

Saturday, June 7, 2025

Calling the largest bedroom in a home the master bedroom now is offensive language

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred phrases can change over time. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines a master bedroom as:

 

“a large or principal bedroom”

 

But an article by Sydney Franklin at The New York Times on August 5, 2020 is titled The Biggest Bedroom Is No Longer a ‘Master.’ Another article by Teneal Zuvela at Home beautiful on September 1, 2024 described The problematic history of the term ‘master bedroom.’

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merriam-Webster said master was first used a century ago. How common it was is shown above via the Google Books Ngram Viewer.

 

Stephan Pastis’s Pearls Before Swine cartoon for May 27, 2025 has the following dialogue about adjectives:

 

Goat: Hey, do you want to see my new master bedroom?

 

Rat: ‘Primary’ bedroom. The word ‘master’ is offensive.

 

Goat: Primary bedroom.

 

Three students: ‘Main bedroom.’ The term ‘primary’ is offensive to primary school students.

 

Goat: I’m gonna just stop talking.

 

Rat: That probably offended someone.

 

The Simpsons fictional character Principal Seymour Skinner could object to principal bedroom.  

 

 

Friday, June 6, 2025

Simon Sinek describes recovering after losing his train of thought


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is an excellent two-minute video from Simon Sinek at TikTok on March 17, 2025 titled What’s your worst public speaking horror story? It also is at Facebook and Instagram. He says about that potential worst moment that:

 

“In the speaking world, there is a big conference thrown by an organization called the Meeting Planners Association of America. Basically all the people from all the big companies and events planners that basically book all the speakers. And if you get invited to this conference, it’s a big deal because if you nail it you’re set for life - because all the people who will hire you for the rest of your career are in the room. And if you fail, I mean your career is basically over. It’s going to be rinky-dink little events for the rest of your life.

 

Anyway, as I was getting going in my career back in the Start with WHY days, I got invited to the Meeting Planners Association of America. I got to speak at it – great honor! I’ve given the speech 1,000 times; I know it inside and out. I’m out there, I’m on the stage speaking. I forgot my train of thought. It’s happened, I’m a pro. I know what to do: go quiet. Find your place, keep going. So I go quiet, not finding my place. Now the panic sets in. I look at my pad, I look at the audience. I don’t know anything that’s going on. I can’t ask the audience, ‘Can you tell me what I was thinking?’ That would be a disaster. My hands are sweaty. My heart is pounding. I don’t know what to do. My life is flashing before my eyes at the end of my career.

 

So I turn to the audience and I say, ‘Do you ever have that experience where you lose your train of thought and just sheer panic sets in? Your hands get clammy, your heart starts pounding?’ I say, ‘Well, I’m having that right now and let me tell you, I’m so glad it’s happening cause it makes me feel alive.’ And the audience erupted. And then I turned to the audience and say, ‘Can somebody please tell me what I was saying, cause I’ve completely forgotten?’ Somebody shouted out, I picked up and off I went. I got more applause for admitting what I was going through than for the actual speech. So it ended up working out okay.

 

I want to hear your horror stories as well. I wanna hear the time you were giving a speech at a wedding, a presentation for work, maybe you were standing on a stage as well. Tell me some of the horror stories you’ve experienced and maybe even how you turned them around, or how they didn’t get turned around. And the one thing we think is the most harrowing – I’ll send you a book just to say, ‘Sorry you had to go through that.’ So just put them down in the comments; can’t wait to hear from you.”

    

The cartoon was adapted from a surprised face at OpenClipArt.

 

 

Thursday, June 5, 2025

What four things would you rather do than call customer support?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is an article by Shep Hyken on April 1, 2025 titled Your Call Is Very Important to Us. In it he discusses some results from surveys titled The State of Customer Service and CX 2025. There were two online surveys of 2,119 U. S. adults done between January 8 and 13 of 2025.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As shown above via a bar chart, 53% would rather have dinner with in-laws. 39% would rather clean a toilet, 34% would rather visit the dentist, and 26% would rather speak in front of an audience of 1,000! There is a brief Instagram video too.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some of these situations also were covered in his previous Achieving Customer Amazement (ACA) surveys. As shown above, percentages who would rather clean a toilet were quite similar: 43% in 2024, 38% in 2023, and 42% in 2022. Percentages who would rather visit the dentist were 46% in 2022 and 48% in 2021.    

 

An image of brushing a toilet came from Wikimedia Commons.

 

 

Wednesday, June 4, 2025

Do’s and don’ts for taking photographs with your smartphone or camera

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a very useful article by Bambi Cash and Blake Carver on pages 12 to 15 of the June 2025 issue of the Toastmaster magazine titled How to Take Great Photos: The do’s and don’ts of taking great photographs. It has sections with advice on:

 

Club or Large Group Shots

Smaller Groups

Hand Gestures [not in the pdf version of this issue]

Speakers and Presenters

Background

Lighting

Selfies

 

There also are Photo Tips from Professionals, and under Background they advise:

 

DON’T: Have people stand in front of a cluttered or confusing background.

DO: Pose them in front of a solid background so the focus is on their faces.

 

But they missed a simple tip - making sure to briefly check ypur recorded image for unintended background effects. What you see may NOT be exactly what you will get. It’s often called the tree growing out of the head problem. (Indoors you instead might get a flagpole). 

  


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your viewfinder image may have the lens aperture wide open, which results in a small depth of field, as is shown above. Then the recorded image has the aperture stopped down, which results in a larger depth of field (also shown). An iPhone support article titled Use Portrait mode on your iPhone says that:

 

“With Portrait mode, the camera creates a depth-of-field effect. This lets you capture photos with a sharp focus on the subject and a blurred background.”

 

There also is an interesting web only article by Biju Arayakkeel in the October 2020 Toastmaster magazine titled 10 Storytelling Lessons from Photography.

 

The smartphone cartoon came from OpenClipArt.

 

 

Monday, June 2, 2025

Similes in speechwriting


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines a simile as:

 

“a figure of speech comparing two unlike things that is often introduced by like or as (as in cheeks like roses)”

 

Of course, there also is a Wikipedia page. And there is a brief, humorous article by John Cadley in the August 2019 issue of Toastmaster Magazine on page 30 titled Silly Similes - those wonderful idioms that don’t say what they mean.

 

A song by John Prine titled It’s A Big Old Goofy World is stitched together from similes. You can listen to it here at YouTube. And Mickey Cheatham posted about it in his STEAMD blog on January 1, 2021. The first verse is:

 

“Up in the morning Work like a dog Is better than sitting Like a bump on a log Mind all your manners Be quiet as a mouse Someday you'll own a home That's as big as a house

 

Chapter 17 – Professional Speechwriting: Metaphor, Simile, and Theme by Lynn Meade in her Advanced Public Speaking book has a discussion of similies (and more on metaphors).

 

The mouse cartoon came from OpenClipArt.

 


Sunday, June 1, 2025

An article on stage fright by David Pennington claimed public speaking was the #1 fear in a Chapman Survey, but ignored their nine other surveys where it was ranked from #26 to #59.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is an article by David Pennington at LinkedIn Pulse on May 19, 2025 titled Stage Fright Is a Liar. In it he claims that:

 

“A study from Chapman University found that public speaking is America’s #1 fear, even ahead of heights, snakes, and drowning (Ref. 1).”

 

His reference is the:

 

“Chapman University Survey on American Fears, 2014 – 2022”

 

Two things are wrong with these claims. The first is that speaking only was reported as the #1 fear for the dozen in the Phobias subset from the 2014 survey. Those results were in an article by Christopher Ingraham in the Washington Post on October 30, 2014 titled America’s top fears: public speaking, heights, and bugs. But David never mentioned results from the later Chapman surveys for 2015 to 2022.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The second is that there also were Chapman Surveys done in both 2023 and 2024. I charted all the data for percent fears of public speaking via two bar charts (shown again above) in a post on December 5, 2024 titled Psychotherapist Jonathan Berent fumbles some statistics about social anxiety and fear of public speaking.

 

Ranks for public speaking in all ten of those surveys (for percent Very Afraid plus Afraid) were:

 

2014       #1

2015       #26

2016       #33

2017       #52

2018       #59

2019       #54

2020/21  #54

2022       #46

2023       #53

2024       #59

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On January 10, 2021 I blogged about how The opening paragraph of an article on public speaking earns two pinnochios for telling us lies. Along with a Phobias category that 2014 survey also has eight fears about Crime, as also are shown above in a bar chart. For Crime the question was: How afraid are you of being victimized in the following ways?; while for Phobias the similar question was: How afraid are you of the following? For both there were the same four possible answers: (Very Afraid, Afraid, Somewhat Afraid, Not Afraid At All). One of those (identity theft/credit card fraud) was feared by 49.7% of Americans, or almost twice the 25.3% for public speaking.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another way to look at results from the Chapman Surveys is via a Fear Score which ranks how afraid people are of public speaking on a scale going from 1 to 4 where 1 = Not Afraid, 2 = Slightly Afraid, 3 = Afraid, 4 = Very Afraid. I discussed this in a blog post on November 9, 2024 titled Overblown claims about fears from investigators for the 2024 Chapman Survey of American Fears. As graphed above and shown below, people consistently were only Slightly Afraid:

 

Year    Fear Score

2014       1.920

2015       1.956

2016       1.933

2017       1.909

2018       1.947

2019       2.081

2020/21  2.023

2022       2.172

2023       2.041

2024       2.067

 

And on June 7, 2024 I blogged about A recent article about fears and phobias based on mediocre research. In that post I linked to my posts about the 2020/2021 and 2023 Chapman Surveys. Mr. Pennington’s article is another based just on mediocre research.