Monday, February 3, 2025

Should you become a performer to enhance your speeches?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maybe not. On page 11 in the February 2025 issue of Toastmaster magazine there is a brief article by Bill Brown titled Become a Performer to Enhance Your Speeches. His advice contradicts that from Joel Schwartzberg in a second article on page 26 in the November 2022 issue of Toastmaster magazine titled Are You Presenting or Performing? and subtitled Tips to focus on your point, not your persona. But Mr. Brown’s article does not reference Mr. Schwartzberg’s. Which advice should we follow?

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And back in the May 1988 issue of Toastmaster magazine there is a third article on pages 24 to 26 and 29 by Michael T. Motley titled Taking the terror out of talk. It is subtitled Thinking in terms of communication rather than performance helps us calm our greatest fear. Back on August 10, 2011 I blogged about how you could Reframe your way around fear of public speaking. More recently fear is discussed by Theo Tsaousides at Psychology Today on November 27, 2017 in a fourth article titled Why Are We Scared of Public Speaking? which explains:

 

“Some theories make the distinction between a performance orientation and a communication orientation. Performance orientation means you view public speaking as something that requires special skills, and you see the role of the audience as judges who are evaluating how good of a presenter you are. In contrast, communication orientation means that the main focus is on expressing your ideas, presenting information, or telling your story. For people with this orientation, the objective is to get through to their audience the same way they get through to people during everyday conversations.”

 

Michael T. Motley and Jennifer L. Molloy published a fifth article in the 1994 Journal of Applied Communication Research titled An efficacy test of a new therapy (“Communication-orientation motivation”) for public speaking anxiety. This therapy is discussed by Graham D. Bodie in a sixth lengthy review article in Communication Education magazine (January 2010, Volume 59, pages 70 to 105) titled A Racing Heart, Rattling Knees, and Ruminative Thoughts: Defining, Explaining, and Treating Public Speaking Anxiety. On page 88 Dr. Bodie says:

 

COM therapy.

Motley’s (1997) communication-orientation modification therapy (COM therapy) posits that PSA [Public Speaking Anxiety] is caused by an individual’s orientation toward public speaking. Individuals who hold a performance-oriented view of public speaking see it as a performance necessitating special skills whereby the audience acts primarily to evaluate. In contrast, communication-oriented speakers see public speaking as more similar to ‘everyday conversation’ (Motley, 1997, p. 380). Communication-orientation modification therapy ‘concentrates on persuading high PSA individuals to abandon their performance orientation in favor of a communication orientation’ (Motley, 1997, p. 380). Although anecdotal evidence (Motley, 1990) and empirical support (Ayres, Hopf & Peterson, 2000; Motley & Molloy, 1994) have been offered to show COM therapy reduces PSA, Booth-Butterfield and Booth-Butterfield (1993) report nonsignificant correlations between self-reported performance orientation and trait CA drawing into question a main contention of COM therapy that performance orientation mediates the relationship between physiological arousal and state anxiety responses. Other research suggests COM therapy may not be effective in all cultures (Ayres, Hopf, & Nagami, 1999).”     

 

The jack in the box image was modified from one at Openclipart.

 


Saturday, February 1, 2025

The most searched for Super Bowl foods by state

 


 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 February 9th is the Super Bowl, which is time to consume mass quantities of food and beverages. There is an article by CaLea Johnson at Mental Floss on January 27, 2025 titled The most popular Super Bowl foods by state, mapped. It shows results via two maps, one for foods and another for desserts. I have summarized them with the two bar charts shown above. Buffalo Chicken Dip was the most popular food ( in 29 states) and Strawberry Shortcake was the most popular dessert ( in 14 states).   

 

But these are not really the most popular foods. That article instead says:

 

“The coffee machine review site [Coffeeness] selected the most popular Super Bowl foods per state by analyzing search volume data from December 2023 to March 2024. Researchers looked at about 1300 food types and around 300 dessert-oriented keywords to determine state-specific preferences, with a focus on search trends leading up to and immediately following the big game.”

 

There is another article by Jessica Randhawa at the forked spoon on November 23, 2020 titled The Best Buffalo Chicken Dip Recipe (+Video).

 


Friday, January 31, 2025

Mickey’s Ten Commandments for design

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is lots of advice about storytelling and designing presentations. I found some excellent advice on page 12 of a book from 2015 by Disney construction developer Marty Sklar titled One Little Spark! – Mickey’s Ten Commandments and The Road to Imagineering, which also is previewed at Google Books. Those commandments are:

 

[ 1] KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE

Identify the prime audience for your attraction or show before you begin design.

 

[ 2] WEAR YOUR GUESTS’ SHOES

Insist that your team members experience your creation just the way guests do it.

 

[ 3] ORGANIZE THE FLOW OF PEOPLE AND IDEAS

Make sure there is a logic and sequence in your stories and in the way guests experience them.

 

[ 4] CREATE A WIENIE (VISUAL MAGNET)

Create visual ‘targets’ that lead visitors clearly and logically through the experience you’ve built.

 

[ 5] COMMUNICATE WITH VISUAL LITERACY

Make good use of color, shape, form, texture – all the nonverbal ways of communication.   

 

[ 6] AVOID OVERLOAD – CREATE TURN-ONS

Resist the temptation to overload your audience with too much information and too many objects.

 

[ 7] TELL ONE STORY AT A TIME

Stick to the story line; good stories are clear, logical, and consistent.

 

[ 8] AVOID CONTRADICTIONS – MAINTAIN IDENTITY

Details in design or content that contradict one another confuse an audience about your story and its time period.

 

[ 9] FOR EVERY OUNCE OF TREATMENT, PROVIDE A TON OF TREAT

In our business, Walt Disney said, you can educate people – but don’t tell them you’re doing it! Make it fun!

 

[10] KEEP IT UP (MAINTAIN IT)

In a Disney park or resort, everything must work. Poor maintenance is poor show!

 

There is more detailed advice in a book review by Andrew Everett at THE KEY POINT on May 1, 2016 titled One Little Spark, like:

 

[7] Tell One Story at a Time. ‘Good stories are clear, logical, and consistent… Storyboards are a must in our work, as a way to develop our story sequences. The objective is to create a story line that holds together from the first sketch to the last…A storyboard review can help reveal a key point or a weak character than can be reworked without tossing out all the good material the creators have developed.’ ”

 

This post was inspired by finding Mickey’s Ten Commandments mentioned by Bob Weis in his 2024 book Dream Chasing: my four decades of success and failure with Walt Disney Imagineering.

 


Wednesday, January 29, 2025

That salute by Elon Musk on January 20th


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gestures can have different meanings. They are not universal. Elon Musk learned that starting on January 20, 2025. There is a Wikipedia page titled Elon Musk gesture controversy which explains:

 

“After Donald Trump was officially sworn in as the president of the United States, Musk attended a celebratory rally at the Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., where he thanked the attendees for voting for Trump. Musk jumped onto the stage, started throwing his hands in the air, and then began to dance.

 

After he finished dancing, Musk placed his hand to his heart and extended his arm out above his head with his palm facing down, making a straight arm gesture. He then turned around and repeated the gesture to the audience behind him. He then said: ‘My heart goes out to you. It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured’ after he finished the gestures.”

 

An article by Tim Dickinson at the Rolling Stone on January 20, 2025 is titled Right-wing extremists are abuzz over Musk’s straight-arm salute. Another article by Jordan Liles at

Snopes on January 22, 2025 is titled Did Musk Give ‘Nazi Salute’ at Trump’s 2025 Inauguration Rally? Here’s What We Know. Jordan said:

 

“We cannot read Musk’s mind to learn precisely what he intended by it. It’s possible it was a purposeful Nazi salute; it could also have been entirely innocent. The available evidence is too scant to draw a solid conclusion.”

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another Wikipedia page titled Roman salute describes some history of how an arm gesture became a fascist and then a Nazi salute, as performed by German gymnasts at the 1936 Olympic Games (shown above).

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

But a very similar gesture regarding the U. S. flag (shown above) is described in another Wikipedia page titled Pledge of Allegiance. The section on salute describes how:

 

In 1892, Francis Bellamy created what was known as the Bellamy salute to accompany his own version of the Pledge of Allegiance. It started with the hand outstretched toward the flag, palm down, and ended with the palm up. Many decades later, during World War II, controversy arose because of the similarity between the Bellamy salute and the Nazi salute, which was adopted in Germany in the 1930s (although, unlike the Bellamy salute, this one did not end with the palm up). As a result, the US Congress stipulated that the hand-over-the-heart gesture would instead be rendered by civilians during the Pledge of Allegiance and the national anthem, thereby replacing the Bellamy salute. Removal of the Bellamy salute occurred on December 22, 1942, when Congress amended the Flag Code language first passed into law on June 22, 1942.”

 

Another gesture has two opposite meaning. A Wikipedia page about the Head shake says it can be used either to indicate rejection (many places) or to indicate approval (Southeastern Europe).

 

A Nazi saluting arm was adapted from an image at Wikimedia Commons. Images of the 1936 Olympics, and a 1942 Bellamy salute both came from the Library of Congress.

 


Monday, January 27, 2025

A great story about how Dick Goodwin wrote Lyndon Johnson’s We Shall Overcome speech on the same day the president delivered it

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On March 15, 1965 President B. Lyndon Johnson spoke to a joint session of Congress for 48 minutes. His speech on civil rights was noteworthy. An article by David Boeri at WBUR on March 14, 2014 discussed The Making of LBJ’s Historic ‘We Shall Overcome’ Speech. You can read the full text in an article at Presidential Rhetoric on March 15, 1965 simply titled We Shall Overcome. There is a CSpan video too.

 

In 2024 historian Doris Kearns Goodwin, who later was Dick Goodwin’s wife, published a book titled An Unfinished Love Story: A personal history of the 1960s. She has the following detailed account of how that speech was created (starting on page 224):

 

“Eventually everyone came around to what Johnson had wanted all along, a televised speech delivered before an extraordinary convening of a joint session of Congress that would allow him  simultaneously to address the Congress and the nation at large. Despite his awareness that a push for voting rights might disrupt his carefully designed production line for the Great Society, it was a risk he was willing to take.

 

Just as the conclusion of Johnson’s meeting with Wallace had hinged upon whether federal troops intervened or were invited into the state of Alabama, so now the president would not be circumventing Congress by appealing to the public directly on television. Instead, he would be accepting a formal invitation to the Hill. At the conclusion of this Cabinet Room meeting, the following statement was issued:

 

‘The Leadership of Congress this afternoon invited the President to address a joint session of the Congress on Monday evening to present the President’s views and outline of a voting rights bill and any other matters that the President desires to discuss.   

 

The President has accepted the invitation and will address a joint session at 9 p.m., Monday evening, March 15th in the House of Representatives.’

 

…. Now the clock was ticking. In about twenty-four hours, 535 members of the House and Senate, along with the nation, would be focused on the president and no speech had yet been drafted. It was like ‘deciding to climb Mt. Everest,’ said Lady Bird, ‘while you are sitting around a cozy family picnic.’

 

Dick spent that Sunday evening at a dinner party at historian Arthur Schlesinger’s home. As the party neared its end, the guests learned that the president was going to address a Joint Session of Congress the following night. Having heard nothing of these plans, Dick called the White House to see if any special messages had been left for him. No messages had been left.

 

‘I was perplexed and disappointed,’ Dick told me. ‘Someone else, I thought must be writing the speech. We had several more drinks, and decided to call it a night.’

 

MONDAY, MARCH 15, 1965

 

The moment Dick stepped into the West Wing on the morning of March 15, there was an unusual hubbub and tension. And there, pacing back and forth in a dither outside Dick’s second floor office, was Jack Valenti. Normally full of glossy good cheer, Valenti pounced on Dick before he could even open his office door. ‘He needs the speech from you, right away.’

 

‘From me! Why didn’t you tell me yesterday? I’ve lost the entire night,’ Dick responded.

 

‘It was a mistake, my mistake,’ Valenti acknowledged.

 

‘Poor Valenti was distraught,’ Dick told me. ‘Apparently, the first words out of the president’s mouth that morning were, ‘how’s Dick coming with the speech?’ When Valenti confessed that he had assigned the speech to Horace Busby, who was in the office the night before, Johnson exploded: ‘The Hell you did. Don’t you know that a liberal Jew has his hand on the pulse of America? Get Dick to do it and now!’

 

The overwrought Valenti handed Dick a folder from his conversations with the president the prior night as well as draft notes for a written message that would accompany the bill. The speech had to be finished before 6 p.m., Valenti told Dick, in order to be loaded on the teleprompter in advance of the president’s televised address. Valenti asked Dick if there was anything – anything at all – he could get for him.     

 

Dick told me he remembered giving Valenti a one word response, ’Serenity.’

 

‘Serenity?’ inquired the puzzled Valenti.

 

‘A globe of serenity,’ Dick replied. ‘I can’t be disturbed. If you want to know how it’s coming, ask my secretary.’

 

Dick looked at his watch. Nine hours away!

 

‘I didn’t want to think about time passing,’ Dick recalled to me. ‘I lit a cigar, looked at my watch, took the watch off my wrist and put it on the desk beside my typewriter. Another puff of my cigar and I took the watch and put it away in my desk drawer.’

 

‘The pressure would have short-circuited me,’ I said. ‘I never had the makings of a good speechwriter or journalist. History is more patient.’

 

‘Well,’ Dick laughed, ‘miss the speech deadline and those pages are only scraps of paper.’

 

Dick examined Valenti’s notes. Johnson wanted no uncertainty about where he stood. He wanted no argument about states’ rights versus federal rights, no blaming oppositions between South and North. To deny fellow Americans the right to vote was simply and unequivocally wrong. He wanted the speech to be affirmative and hopeful. He would be sending a bill to Congress to protect the fundamental right to vote for all Americans, and he wanted the speech to drive and speed public sentiment.  

 

In the year since Dick had started to work at the White House, he had listened to Johnson talk for hundreds of hours -on planes and in cars, during meals at the Executive Mansion and at the ranch, in the swimming pool and over late-night drinks. He understood Johnson’s deeply held convictions about civil rights. He knew the cadences of his speech. The speechwriter’s job, Dick explained, was to clarify, heighten, and polish the speaker’s convictions in the speaker’s own language and natural rhythms. If the words did not sound authentic to the speaker, the emotional current of the speech would not hit home.

 

I knew that Dick often searched for an arresting short sentence to begin every speech or article he wrote. On this day, he surely found it.

 

I speak tonight for the dignity of man and the destiny of democracy.

 

He then sought to situate this pivotal moment in the sweep of our nation’s history.  

 

At times, history and fate meet at a single time in a single place to shape a turning point in man’s unending search for freedom. So it was at Lexington and Concord. So it was a century ago at Apppomattox. So it was last week in Selma, Alabama.

 

‘The basic concept underlying the entire speech,’ Dick explained to me, ‘is that our government has been summoned, pushed by the people, and to that force and pressure, we will respond.’

 

There is no cause for pride in what has happened in Selma …. But there is cause for hope and for faith in our democracy in what is happening here tonight. For the cries of pain, and the hymns and protests of oppressed people – like some great trumpet – have summoned into convocation all the majesty of this government of the greatest nation on earth.

 

No sooner would Dick pull a page out of his typewriter and hand it to his secretary than Valenti would somehow materialize, a nerve-worn courier, eager to personally express pages from Dick’s secretary into the president’s anxious hands. Johnson’s edits and penciled notations were incorporated into the text while he awaited the next installment, lashing out at everyone within range – everyone except Dick.

 

It soon became clear that the speech was no lawyer’s brief debating the merits of the bill soon to be sent to Congress. Rather, it was a credo of what we are as a nation, and who we are as a people – a redefining moment in our history brought forth by the foot soldiers of the Civil Rights Movement.

 

The real hero of this struggle is the American Negro. His actions and protests, his courage to risk safety and even to risk his life, have awakened the conscience of this nation.

 

….He has called upon us to make good the promise of America. And who among us can say that we would have made the same progress were it not for his persistent bravery, and his faith in American democracy.

 

…. As the light shifted across the room, Dick became aware that the day suddenly seemed to be rushing by. He opened the desk drawer, peered at the face of his watch, took a deep breath, and quickly slammed the drawer shut. For the first time that day he walked outside to get air and refresh his mind.

 

…. Already the sun was beginning to set that chilly March evening when the phone in Dick’s office rang for the first time that day. It was after six o’clock, past the deadline to feed all the finished pages of the speech into the teleprompter. The voice at the other end was ‘so calm, sweet, and sedate’ that Dick hardly recognized it as the voice of the president of the United States.

 

‘Far and away,’ Dick told me, ‘the gentlest tones I ever heard from Lyndon.’

 

‘You remember, Dick,’ Johnson said in a whisper, ‘that one of my first jobs after college was teaching young Mexican Americans in Cotulla. I told you about that down at the Ranch. I thought you might want to put in a reference to that,’ Dick recalled Johnson telling him.

 

What Johnson impressed on him, Dick told me, was that those kids in Cotulla had nothing. They had a hard, hard life. ‘Hell,’ he told Dick, ‘I spent half my pay to buy sports equipment for the school.’

 

Not twenty minutes had passed when the phone rang a second time. In that second call, Dick told me, Johnson was still musing about his time in Cotulla. ‘It was a long time ago,’ he said, ‘but those kids have their own kids. And now we do something about it.’

 

Hardly four minutes passed ad the phone rang a third time. ‘I almost forgot, Dick, L’d like you to ride up to the Hill with me tonight.’

 

‘When I finished,’ Dick recalled, ‘I felt perfectly blank. It was done. It was beyond revision. It was dark outside and I checked my wrist to see what time it was, remembered I had hidden my watch away from my sight, retrieved it from the drawer, and put it back on.’  “ 

 

I got the book after seeing an article by David Murray at Pro Rhetoric on September 3, 2024 titled Doris Kearns-Goodwin’s account of her husband Dick Goodwin’s political speechwriting career is fascinating and touching, both.

    

A portrait of LBJ came from Wikimedia Commons.

 


Saturday, January 25, 2025

Seeing data using exploratory data analysis and histograms


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When I get bored, I play solitare – the online version from TheSolitaire.com. Recently I got curious about how much time and how many moves it was taking me to complete a game. What would the averages be? Would their shape just follow a Normal Distribution - the symmetrical bell curve shown above. It has roughly two thirds of the data (68.3%) in a range plus or minus one standard deviation from the mean.  

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Or would there instead be a skew distribution, as shown above? I did some exploratory data analysis. I kept track of a hundred games, and then used Microsoft Excel to plot histograms.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A histogram for time to complete is shown above. The mean time to complete was 208 seconds (3 minutes and 28 seconds) and the standard deviation was 27.6 seconds.  Columns in this histogram are twenty seconds wide. There are roughly two and a half to the left of the mean, but four and a half to the right.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another histogram, for the number of moves to complete, is shown above. The mean number of moves was 134 and the standard deviation was 12 moves. Columns in this histogram are ten moves wide. There are three to the left of the mean, but four to the right.  

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Both histograms have a positive skew. They are shaped like the slide on a children’s playground, as shown above via a cartoon.

 


Friday, January 24, 2025

A single-panel comic about replacing a motivational quote for your boss’s speech

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On January 23, 2025 there was a Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal comic by Zach Weinersmith titled You can make your boss’s speech more memorable by replacing their motivational quote with Richard II’s speech to the peasants at Waltham, 1381.

 

Always proofread your PowerPoint slides before you speak. If you had asked an employee to insert a quote, then instead of one from Wayne Gretzy like:

 

"You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.” or “Procrastination is one of the most common and deadliest of diseases and its toll on success and happiness is heavy.”

 

you might find:

 

“You wretches detestable on land and sea:

You who seek equality with lords are unworthy to live.

Give this message to your colleagues: rustics you were,

and rustics you are still: you will remain in bondage,

not as before, but incomparably harsher.

 

For as long as we live we will strive to repress you,

and your misery will be an example in the eyes of posterity.”

 

The image was adapted from this one at Openclipart.