Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Sunday, August 10, 2025

There is a big difference between an anecdote and an antidote

 












 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a post by Dr. John Livingston at the Gem State Patriot News blog on August 2, 2025 titled Factions and Bullies. His subject was the tenth Federalist Paper by James Madison, published in November 1787 and titled The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection (continued). John began the seventh paragraph by claiming (my italics):

 

“Madison asserted and I must paraphrase that the anecdote for factional violence is a large Union with diverse life experiences and a common moral ethic.”

 

But there is a big difference between an antidote and an anecdote. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, an anecdote is:

 

“A usually short narrative of an interesting, amusing, or biographical incident.”

 

And an antidote instead is:

 

“A remedy to counteract the effects of poison”

                                         or

“Something that relieves, prevents, or counteracts“

 

As usual, Dr. Livingston didn’t bother to proofread what he wrote. Perhaps he just dictated it.  Rather ironically on July 27, 2025 he blogged about What’s in a Word. I last blogged about another mixup in a post on July 25, 2025 titled There are haves and have nots; but there are just two halves, and no halve nots.

 

An image of a story book came from OpenClipArt, and an image of a medicine bottle was adapted from the Library of Congress.

 

 

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

Disinformation from the Gem State Patriot News


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a post from Bob ‘Nugie’ Neugebauer at the Gem State Patriot News blog on July 27, 2025 simply titled Disinformation. The third sentence in his last paragraph says that:

 

“You will not find any disinformation in our newsletter and if you ever should we ask that you please let us know where we have gone wrong.”

 

But I already tried to do that, and was rejected. In a previous post on June 22,2025 titled Idaho Faces Growth and Ideological Challenges the fourth paragraph began by claiming that:

 

“Our nation’s welfare system represents a catastrophic failure that has entrenched poverty rather than eliminating it. Since Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society programs, poverty rates have remained frozen around 15% instead of continuing their post-World War II decline.”

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I discussed that claim in a post on June 25, 2025 titled The U.S. poverty rate has not been ‘Frozen around 15%’ since the Great Society. As shown above, from 1990 to 2023 it had moved up to 15.1% and down to 10.5%.  And I sent Mr. Neugebauer the following comment:

 

“Bob:

 

You are quite wrong about the rate for poverty. The only time the poverty rate was ‘frozen’ at around 15% was between 2010 and 2014. It was ‘frozen’ at 12.6% from 2003 to 2005 and at 11.5% from 2020 to 2022. In 2019 (under Trump) the poverty rate had fallen to 10.5%, which is 4.5% lower than the 15% you cited. Clearly you don’t know what you are talking about. For details see a post at my Joyful Public Speaking blog on June 25 titled The U.S. poverty rate has not been ‘Frozen around 15%’ since the Great Society.”

 

He rejected it and never posted that comment on his blog.

 

 

Tuesday, July 22, 2025

In a BBC phone interview Donald Trump said “I trust almost nobody”


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A video by BBC News on July 15, 2025 is titled Listen: ‘I trust almost nobody,’ Trump says when asked about Putin. If you trust nobody, then you will do your own research and will make bad decisions – like starting a trade war with tariffs on our neighbors, friends, and almost everyone else.

 

An article by Abbey Lewis at Harvard Business Impact is titled Good leadership? It all starts with trust. She says to be transparent, authentic, and reliable. And a second article by Col. Joe LeBoeuf and Lt. Col. Joe Doty at the Association of the United States Army on January 26, 2022 is titled When it comes to effective leadership, trust matters.

 

We are now just six months, or one eighth through Trump’s second term as president. The other seven-eighths likely will not make America great.  

 

 

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

The U.S. poverty rate has not been ‘Frozen around 15%’ since the Great Society


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sometimes just a little research reveals that a political pundit doesn’t know what he’s talking about. A post by Bob ‘Nugie” Neugebauer at the Gem State Patriot News blog on June 22, 2025 titled Idaho Faces Growth and Ideological Challenges claims:

 

“Our nation’s welfare system represents a catastrophic failure that has entrenched poverty rather than eliminating it. Since Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society programs, poverty rates have remained frozen around 15% instead of continuing their post-World War II decline. This system rewards dependency by incentivizing single-parent households, discouraging marriage, and enabling able-bodied individuals to avoid work.”

 

Did he look that up or just borrow it from somewhere else? I found an article by Rachel Bade at Politico on September 17, 2013 including that headline. It is titled Pro Report, presented by POWERJOBS: Obama orders security revie – Navy cut security to reduce costs – U. S. poverty rate frozen at 15 percent – Uninsured rate declines. It says:

 

U.S. POVERTY RATE FROZEN AT 15 PERCENT. One-in-seven Americans still lived below the poverty line last year, several years out from the recession. (The poverty line, FYI is just over $23,400 for a family of four). That’s about the same as last year, and the sixth straight year without improvement, according to an AP analysis. Although the unemployment rate sank from 9.6 percent in 2010 to 8.1 percent last year, poverty didn’t, and that’s unusual, analysts say: ‘Typically, the poverty rate tends to move in a similar direction as the unemployment rate, so many analysts had been expecting a modest decline in poverty,’ AP’s Hope Yen writes.”

 

There also is a 2017 book by Jon H. Widener titled The Nexus: Understanding Faith and Modern Culture which says:

 

“In the US, the poverty rate was going down until President Lyndon Johnson began the War on Poverty in the 1960s. Since then the poverty rate has been frozen at 14 to 15 percent and has stayed there despite an outlay of $20 trillion over all those years and despite the continuing outlay of $1 trillion a year. The unabashedly collectivist Obama administration continued these policies during its eight years.”

 

Another article at Debt.org on December 21, 2023 titled Poverty in the United States has a section titled Poverty Levels Over Time which instead states:

 

“In the late 1950s the poverty rate in the U.S. was approximately 22%, with just shy of 40 million Americans living in poverty. The rate declined steadily, reaching a low of 11.1% in 1973 and rising to a high of nearly 15% three times – in 1983, 1993, and 2011 – before hitting an all-time low of 10.5% in 2019. However, the 46.7 million Americans in poverty in 2014 was the most ever recorded.”   

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I looked up a detailed report by Robert D. Plotnik et al. of the Institute for Research on Poverty titled The Twentieth Century Record of Inequality and Poverty in the United States (Discussion Paper 1166-98 July 1998). Figure 3 on page 24 is shown above, with data for 1947 to 1996 (I added the times for the Great Society). Since those programs ended in 1968 the poverty rate ranged from 12% to 15% and never was frozen. In 1974 the rate hit a minimum of around 12%, 3% lower than the 15% cited by Mr. Neugebauer.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How about more recently? There is a web page by Abigail Tierney at statista on September 16, 2024 titled Poverty rate in the United States from 1990 to 2023. A replot of her graph is shown above. The only time the rate was ‘frozen’ at around 15% was between 2010 and 2014. It was ‘frozen’ at 12.6% from 2003 to 2005 and at 11.5% from 2020 to 2022. In 2019 (under Trump) the poverty rate had fallen to 10.5%, which is 4.5% lower than the 15% cited by Mr. Neugebauer. Clearly he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

 

The 1883 Josh Shaw painting of empty pockets was adapted from Wikimedia Commons.  

 

 

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Skutnik is speechwriter jargon for someone who gets acknowledged by the President in his State of the Union address


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An article by David Murray at Pro Rhetoric on May 25, 2023 titled “The Lehrman Landing” – and Other Jargon Speechwriters Should Use Constantly includes the following jargon term:

 

Skutnik. On January 13, 1982, a low-level government worker named Lenny Skutnik saved a woman from drowning after a plane crashed in the icy Potomac River. President Reagan invited Skutnik to attend the State of the Union Address a couple weeks later, and called him out during the speech as the kind of American hero we need more of, these days. Such call-outs to ordinary citizens became a staple of State of the Union speeches that continues to this day. By the speechwriters who stage them, they are called ‘Skutniks.’ “

 

Wikipedia has both a page about Lenny Skutnik and a List of Lenny Skutniks. There also is an article from the Congressional Budget Office on June 3, 2010 titled Lenny Skutnik, CBO’s Most Famous Employee, Retires.

 

 Congressional Research Service has Report R44770 on January 9, 2019 titled History, Evolution, and Practices of the President’s State of the Union Address: Frequently Asked Questions. It has a section titled When Did the Tradition of Acknowledging Guests Sitting in the House Gallery Begin? that explains:

 

“The chief executive frequently invites citizens who have distinguished themselves in some field of service or endeavor to be personal guests in the gallery. President Ronald Reagan began the tradition in 1982 by acknowledging Lenny Skutnik in his speech. Since then, most State of the Union addresses have included the direct mention of at least one presidential guest who was in attendance. Presidential speechwriters often refer to these guests as ‘Lenny Skutniks.’ Usually, the achievements or programs for which the President publicly salutes these guests also serve to underscore some major element of the message. For example, guests have included civil rights pioneer Rosa Parks, former President of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai, NBA star and humanitarian Dikembe Mutombo, former Treasury Secretary and Senator Lloyd Bentsen, baseball great Henry ‘Hank’ Aaron, and numerous military servicemembers and veterans.”

 

A recent article by Sherri Kolade at Ragan PR Daily on February 20, 2024 titled Use this decades-old speechwriting technique to create powerful messages today describes:

 

“Reagan’s speechwriter Aram Bakshian, Jr. said that he ‘wrote Lenny Skutnik into the finale’ of Reagan’s speech to play up the hero aspect, according to the Miller Center.

 

‘I wrote the passage that created the hero in the gallery ploy, which unfortunately has been milked to death since and overdone. I almost regret it.’

 

While Bakshian, Jr. may be sick of the tactic, it’s been used so frequently because it works. These Skutniks often resonate with audiences as their stories tug at heartstrings.

 

Michael Ricci, former director of communications for then-Maryland Governor Larry Hogan and former speechwriter and director of communications for John Boehner and Paul Ryan, told PR Daily that speechwriters can use Skutniks to connect the dots with audiences and their sdesire to relate to a hero in a speech.”

 

The image came from a YouTube video of Ronald Reagan Acknowledging Lenny Skutnik 1982.

 

 

Thursday, May 29, 2025

The first sentence in Donald Trump’s Truth Social Post on Memorial Day stated a number that was a million times too large


 

 

 

 

An article by Laerke Christensen at Snopes on May 27, 2025 is titled Fact Check: Trump’s Memorial Day Message. He began by claiming in all caps (my italics):

 

“HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY TO ALL, INCLUDING THE SCUM THAT SPENT THE LAST FOUR YEARS TRYING TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY THROUGH WARPED RADICAL LEFT MINDS, WHO ALLOWED 21,000,000 MILLION PEOPLE TO ILLEGALLY ENTER OUR COUNTRY, MANY OF THEM BEING CRIMINALS AND THE MENTALLY INSANE,THROUGH AN OPEN BORDER THAT ONLY AN INCOMPETENT PRESIDENT WOULD APPROVE, AND THROUGH JUDGES WHO ARE ON A MISSION TO KEEP MURDERERS, DRUG DEALERS, RAPISTS, GANG MEMBERS, AND RELEASED PRISONERS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD, IN OUR COUNTRY SO THEY CAN ROB, MURDER, AND RAPE AGAIN — ALL PROTECTED BY THESE USA HATING JUDGES WHO SUFFER FROM AN IDEOLOGY THAT IS SICK, AND VERY DANGEROUS FOR OUR COUNTRY.”

 

He meant instead to say 21 million, as was previously discussed by Simonne Shah and Leslie Dickstein in TIME on December 11, 2024 in another article titled Fact-Checking What Donald Trump Said in His 2024 Person of the Year Interview With TIME. The extra factor of a million raised the number to 21,000,000,000,000 – which is 21 trillion. But the world population only is about eight billion, so the number he said is quite absurd and a consequence of not having proofread.

 


Monday, April 21, 2025

A flawed White House document regarding President Trump’s accomplishments in his first hundred days


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The first hundred days of a presidency often is used as a benchmark for what to expect. There is a White House document titled President Trump’s 100 Days of Historic Accomplishments. It has a mixture of arrogance and ignorance we would expect. This document contains a list of his executive orders compared with predecessors (as shown above in a bar chart). But that list is missing results for both his immediate predecessor Joe Biden (42) and his first term (24). Worse yet the claim of only 30 executive orders is obviously wrong:  the Wikipedia page titled List of executive orders in the second presidency of Donald Trump shows 26 signed on the very first day, 36 in the first week and 130 total.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another bar chart (shown above) from the March 27, 2025 Ballotpedia article titled President Donald Trump issues most executive orders in the first 100 days since 1933 says Trump instead had 103, versus 33 in his first term.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trump’s document also has a list of number of laws enacted (shown above in a third bar chart). Again, it is missing both his immediate predecessor Joe Biden (with 11) and his first term (again with 28), but it also left off Franklin Roosevelt with 77, who was included in the list of executive orders.

 

Sunday, April 20, 2025

A controversy about Boise displaying a pride flag at City Hall


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flying a flag is a graphical form of speech. You would expect conservatives to want that speech to be free. But that’s not what the Idaho legislature did during this session. There is an article by Kyle Pfannenstiel at the Idaho Capital Sun on February 18, 2025 titled Idaho bill limiting types of flags state, local governments can display passes House.

 

Our legislature passed House Bill 96, which limited what flags government entities (the state, a county, municipality, special district or other political subdivision) can fly. The only flags allowed are: the United States flag, the official flag of a government entity, official flags of any U.S. state, the POW/MIA flag, and official flags of Indian tribes. Curiously these restrictions do not apply to schools, colleges, or universities.

 

There is another article by Greg Pruett at the Idaho Dispatch on April 13, 2025 titled Day 10: McLean Stands Firm Against Removal of LGBT flag. Besides the Dispatch he runs the Idaho Second Amendment Alliance (also see this Idaho Voters article).

 

Yet another article by Richard Rodriguez at KTVB7 on April 15, 2025 is titled Idaho Attorney General urges Boise Mayor to remove pride flag. He noted that:

 

“…during legislative debate that the bill appeared targeted specifically at Boise, as examples presented during hearings focused exclusively on pride flags displayed in the capital city….

 

Meanwhile, Bonners Ferry in northern Idaho continues to fly a Canadian flag outside its City Hall.”  

 

There is a press release by Raul Labrador on April 15, 2025 titled Attorney General Labrador Asks Boise Mayor to Comply with State Law. In it he noted:

 

“...Although there is no express criminal or civil penalty provided for in this statute, you should comply with the law out of a sense of duty to your oath of office. As Idaho’s Attorney General, I ask that you reconsider your defiance of this duly enacted law and remove all prohibited flags.”

 

A statute without a penalty really is quite silly.

 

An image of Boise flags came from here at Instagram.

 


Saturday, April 5, 2025

Cory Booker delivered the longest speech in the history of the United States Senate


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cory Booker is a Democrat and the senior senator from the state of New Jersey. Starting at 7:00 PM on on March 31, 2025 he delivered the longest speech in the history of the Senate – lasting for twenty-five hours and five minutes. There is a Wikipedia page titled Cory Booker’s marathon speech. He protested Donald Trump’s second term as president.

 

There is an article about it by Robin Camarote at Inc. on April 2, 2025 titled Cory Booker and the Art of Authentic Communication. A second article by Suzanne Lucas, also at Inc. on April 2, 2025 is titled Leadership lessons from Cory Booker’s filibuster: Focus on the message, not the spotlight. And there is a third article by Stephen Khan at The Conversation on April 4, 2025 titled The hidden power of marathon Senate speeches: What history tells us about Cory Booker’s 25-hour oration.

 

The portrait of Senator Booker is from Wikimedia Commons.

 


Monday, March 24, 2025

Anthony Dolan, President Reagan’s chief speechwriter died this month


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anthony Rossi Dolan died this month (see an obituary). An article by Lee Habeeb in Newsweek on March 20, 2025 titled Remembering Tony Dolan: President Reagan’s Chief Speechwriter told us:

 

“You probably don’t know his name, but you know his work. He penned or had a hand in some of the greatest speeches of the 20th century, serving as President Ronald Reagan’s chief speechwriter. The ‘Ash Heap of History’ speech. The ‘Tear Down This Wall’ speech. The ‘Evil Empire’ speech. They all had Tony Dolan’s fingerprints, his handprints, all over them.

 

Prior to working for Reagan, Dolan was the youngest journalist in American history to win the Pulitzer Prize for his work at the Stamford Advocate in the late 1970s exposing the Mafia’s grip on the city’s local government – from the local police force straight through to city hall.”   

 

Another article by Amanda J. Rothschild at The Hill on March 22, 2025 is titled From Reagan to Trump, a speechwriter’s legacy lives on in Washington. Yet another article by James Kirchick at Rolling Stone on July 28, 2022, about his gay younger brother Terry, is titled These ultraconservative brothers pulled strings in Reagan’s Washington. Then one of them was outed as gay.

 

Even earlier, as a sophomore at Yale, Anthony had an album of folk songs, described by Wayne Liebman in the Yale Daily News on December 12, 1967 in an article titled Sophomore Cuts Album.

 

There is a thirteen-minute YouTube video with Peter Robinson and Christopher Buckley of the Hoover Institution [at Stanford] reminiscing about him titled Anthony Dolan (1948-2025).

 

The portrait came from Wikimedia Commons.

 


Saturday, March 22, 2025

Is everyone really welcome here?



 

 

 

 

Recently in the Boise area there has been a continuing story regarding Sarah Inama, a 35-year-old world civilization teacher at Lewis and Clark Middle School in Meridian. She was told to take down posters which have been hanging in her class since she started working there four years ago. The story also was discussed in a nine-minute YouTube video from Chris Hayes at MSNBC on March 19, 2025 titled Idaho teacher fights back after order to remove ‘Everyone is Welcome Here’ poster.

 

The story was discussed in two articles by Brian Holmes at KTVB7one on March 11, 2025 titled West Ada School District teacher ordered to remove inclusive signs from classroom and another on March 12, 2025 titled West Ada issues sports analogy response to teacher told to remove ‘everyone is welcome here’ poster.

 

There also have been a series of brief YouTube videos at KTVB7. One on March 10, 2025 is titled Idaho teacher ordered to remove “Everyone is welcome here” sign from classroom. A second on March 12, 2025 is titled Idaho school district issues memo regarding teacher told to remove “Everyone Is Welcome Here” poster. A third on March 13, 2025 is titled Idaho school district responds after telling teacher to remove inclusive signage from classroom. A fourth on March 20, 2025 is titled ‘Everyone Is Welcome Here’ shirts made by the thousands opposing West Ada’s decision.

 

 

UPDATE March 23, 2025

 

I missed a fifth video from KTVB7 on March 17, 2025 titled “Everyone is welcome here’: Idaho organizations join Wassmuth Center campaign. On October 27, 2024 I blogged about A new building at Boise’s Wassmuth Center for Human Rights with quotations carved in stone.

 

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

During his speech to Congress last night President Trump lied about fraud in Social Security payments

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I listened to much of President Trump’s 99-minute speech to a joint session of Congress last night. One section was particularly interesting to me, since it claimed there was widespread payment fraud.

 

“Believe it or not, government databases list 4.7 million Social Security members from people aged 100 to 109 years old. It lists 3.6 million people from ages 110 to 119. I don’t know any of them. I know some people that are rather elderly, but not quite that elderly. 3.47 million people from ages 120 to 129. 2.9 million people from ages 130 to 139. 3.5 million people from ages 140 to 149, and money is being paid to many of them, and we’re searching right now.

 

In fact, Pam, good luck, good luck. You’re going to find it. But a lot of money is paid out to people, because it just keeps getting paid and paid, and nobody does, and it really hurts Social Security and our country. 1.3 million people from ages 150 to 159, and over 130,000 people, according to the social security databases, are age over 160 years old. We have a healthier country than I thought, Bobby.

 

Including, to finish, 1,039 people between the ages of 220 and 229, and one person between the age of 240 to 249 and one person is listed at 360 years of age – more than 100 years, more than 100 years more than our country. But we’re going to find out where the money is going, and it’s not going to be pretty, by slashing all of the fraud, waste and theft. And theft we can find. We will defeat inflation, bring down mortgage rates, lower car payments and grocery prices, protect our seniors and put more money in the pockets of American families.”

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Today I checked to see if his numbers made any sense. They do not - they're a fairy tale. Those numbers came from a post by Elon Musk, shown above with ages over 120 highlighted in yellow. (There are a total of 12,428,110). Two weeks ago there was a brief YouTube video at Fox News misleadingly titled Over 11 million Americans are collecting Social Security between the ages of 120 and 160. It’s misleading since at the very end it revealed that no payments really were made to those over 115 years old, as is indicated on a web page from the Social Security Program Operations Management System (POMS) that says this automatic stoppage has been going on since back in September of 2015. An article by Kinsey Crowley at USA Today on February 19, 2025 titled ‘Vampires’ in Social Security data? Here’s what to know after Elon Musk claims SSA fraud makes the same observation.

 

Any competent speechwriter would have edited out that lie.

 


Wednesday, January 29, 2025

That salute by Elon Musk on January 20th


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gestures can have different meanings. They are not universal. Elon Musk learned that starting on January 20, 2025. There is a Wikipedia page titled Elon Musk gesture controversy which explains:

 

“After Donald Trump was officially sworn in as the president of the United States, Musk attended a celebratory rally at the Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., where he thanked the attendees for voting for Trump. Musk jumped onto the stage, started throwing his hands in the air, and then began to dance.

 

After he finished dancing, Musk placed his hand to his heart and extended his arm out above his head with his palm facing down, making a straight arm gesture. He then turned around and repeated the gesture to the audience behind him. He then said: ‘My heart goes out to you. It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured’ after he finished the gestures.”

 

An article by Tim Dickinson at the Rolling Stone on January 20, 2025 is titled Right-wing extremists are abuzz over Musk’s straight-arm salute. Another article by Jordan Liles at

Snopes on January 22, 2025 is titled Did Musk Give ‘Nazi Salute’ at Trump’s 2025 Inauguration Rally? Here’s What We Know. Jordan said:

 

“We cannot read Musk’s mind to learn precisely what he intended by it. It’s possible it was a purposeful Nazi salute; it could also have been entirely innocent. The available evidence is too scant to draw a solid conclusion.”

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another Wikipedia page titled Roman salute describes some history of how an arm gesture became a fascist and then a Nazi salute, as performed by German gymnasts at the 1936 Olympic Games (shown above).

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

But a very similar gesture regarding the U. S. flag (shown above) is described in another Wikipedia page titled Pledge of Allegiance. The section on salute describes how:

 

In 1892, Francis Bellamy created what was known as the Bellamy salute to accompany his own version of the Pledge of Allegiance. It started with the hand outstretched toward the flag, palm down, and ended with the palm up. Many decades later, during World War II, controversy arose because of the similarity between the Bellamy salute and the Nazi salute, which was adopted in Germany in the 1930s (although, unlike the Bellamy salute, this one did not end with the palm up). As a result, the US Congress stipulated that the hand-over-the-heart gesture would instead be rendered by civilians during the Pledge of Allegiance and the national anthem, thereby replacing the Bellamy salute. Removal of the Bellamy salute occurred on December 22, 1942, when Congress amended the Flag Code language first passed into law on June 22, 1942.”

 

Another gesture has two opposite meaning. A Wikipedia page about the Head shake says it can be used either to indicate rejection (many places) or to indicate approval (Southeastern Europe).

 

A Nazi saluting arm was adapted from an image at Wikimedia Commons. Images of the 1936 Olympics, and a 1942 Bellamy salute both came from the Library of Congress.

 


Monday, January 27, 2025

A great story about how Dick Goodwin wrote Lyndon Johnson’s We Shall Overcome speech on the same day the president delivered it

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On March 15, 1965 President B. Lyndon Johnson spoke to a joint session of Congress for 48 minutes. His speech on civil rights was noteworthy. An article by David Boeri at WBUR on March 14, 2014 discussed The Making of LBJ’s Historic ‘We Shall Overcome’ Speech. You can read the full text in an article at Presidential Rhetoric on March 15, 1965 simply titled We Shall Overcome. There is a CSpan video too.

 

In 2024 historian Doris Kearns Goodwin, who later was Dick Goodwin’s wife, published a book titled An Unfinished Love Story: A personal history of the 1960s. She has the following detailed account of how that speech was created (starting on page 224):

 

“Eventually everyone came around to what Johnson had wanted all along, a televised speech delivered before an extraordinary convening of a joint session of Congress that would allow him  simultaneously to address the Congress and the nation at large. Despite his awareness that a push for voting rights might disrupt his carefully designed production line for the Great Society, it was a risk he was willing to take.

 

Just as the conclusion of Johnson’s meeting with Wallace had hinged upon whether federal troops intervened or were invited into the state of Alabama, so now the president would not be circumventing Congress by appealing to the public directly on television. Instead, he would be accepting a formal invitation to the Hill. At the conclusion of this Cabinet Room meeting, the following statement was issued:

 

‘The Leadership of Congress this afternoon invited the President to address a joint session of the Congress on Monday evening to present the President’s views and outline of a voting rights bill and any other matters that the President desires to discuss.   

 

The President has accepted the invitation and will address a joint session at 9 p.m., Monday evening, March 15th in the House of Representatives.’

 

…. Now the clock was ticking. In about twenty-four hours, 535 members of the House and Senate, along with the nation, would be focused on the president and no speech had yet been drafted. It was like ‘deciding to climb Mt. Everest,’ said Lady Bird, ‘while you are sitting around a cozy family picnic.’

 

Dick spent that Sunday evening at a dinner party at historian Arthur Schlesinger’s home. As the party neared its end, the guests learned that the president was going to address a Joint Session of Congress the following night. Having heard nothing of these plans, Dick called the White House to see if any special messages had been left for him. No messages had been left.

 

‘I was perplexed and disappointed,’ Dick told me. ‘Someone else, I thought must be writing the speech. We had several more drinks, and decided to call it a night.’

 

MONDAY, MARCH 15, 1965

 

The moment Dick stepped into the West Wing on the morning of March 15, there was an unusual hubbub and tension. And there, pacing back and forth in a dither outside Dick’s second floor office, was Jack Valenti. Normally full of glossy good cheer, Valenti pounced on Dick before he could even open his office door. ‘He needs the speech from you, right away.’

 

‘From me! Why didn’t you tell me yesterday? I’ve lost the entire night,’ Dick responded.

 

‘It was a mistake, my mistake,’ Valenti acknowledged.

 

‘Poor Valenti was distraught,’ Dick told me. ‘Apparently, the first words out of the president’s mouth that morning were, ‘how’s Dick coming with the speech?’ When Valenti confessed that he had assigned the speech to Horace Busby, who was in the office the night before, Johnson exploded: ‘The Hell you did. Don’t you know that a liberal Jew has his hand on the pulse of America? Get Dick to do it and now!’

 

The overwrought Valenti handed Dick a folder from his conversations with the president the prior night as well as draft notes for a written message that would accompany the bill. The speech had to be finished before 6 p.m., Valenti told Dick, in order to be loaded on the teleprompter in advance of the president’s televised address. Valenti asked Dick if there was anything – anything at all – he could get for him.     

 

Dick told me he remembered giving Valenti a one word response, ’Serenity.’

 

‘Serenity?’ inquired the puzzled Valenti.

 

‘A globe of serenity,’ Dick replied. ‘I can’t be disturbed. If you want to know how it’s coming, ask my secretary.’

 

Dick looked at his watch. Nine hours away!

 

‘I didn’t want to think about time passing,’ Dick recalled to me. ‘I lit a cigar, looked at my watch, took the watch off my wrist and put it on the desk beside my typewriter. Another puff of my cigar and I took the watch and put it away in my desk drawer.’

 

‘The pressure would have short-circuited me,’ I said. ‘I never had the makings of a good speechwriter or journalist. History is more patient.’

 

‘Well,’ Dick laughed, ‘miss the speech deadline and those pages are only scraps of paper.’

 

Dick examined Valenti’s notes. Johnson wanted no uncertainty about where he stood. He wanted no argument about states’ rights versus federal rights, no blaming oppositions between South and North. To deny fellow Americans the right to vote was simply and unequivocally wrong. He wanted the speech to be affirmative and hopeful. He would be sending a bill to Congress to protect the fundamental right to vote for all Americans, and he wanted the speech to drive and speed public sentiment.  

 

In the year since Dick had started to work at the White House, he had listened to Johnson talk for hundreds of hours -on planes and in cars, during meals at the Executive Mansion and at the ranch, in the swimming pool and over late-night drinks. He understood Johnson’s deeply held convictions about civil rights. He knew the cadences of his speech. The speechwriter’s job, Dick explained, was to clarify, heighten, and polish the speaker’s convictions in the speaker’s own language and natural rhythms. If the words did not sound authentic to the speaker, the emotional current of the speech would not hit home.

 

I knew that Dick often searched for an arresting short sentence to begin every speech or article he wrote. On this day, he surely found it.

 

I speak tonight for the dignity of man and the destiny of democracy.

 

He then sought to situate this pivotal moment in the sweep of our nation’s history.  

 

At times, history and fate meet at a single time in a single place to shape a turning point in man’s unending search for freedom. So it was at Lexington and Concord. So it was a century ago at Apppomattox. So it was last week in Selma, Alabama.

 

‘The basic concept underlying the entire speech,’ Dick explained to me, ‘is that our government has been summoned, pushed by the people, and to that force and pressure, we will respond.’

 

There is no cause for pride in what has happened in Selma …. But there is cause for hope and for faith in our democracy in what is happening here tonight. For the cries of pain, and the hymns and protests of oppressed people – like some great trumpet – have summoned into convocation all the majesty of this government of the greatest nation on earth.

 

No sooner would Dick pull a page out of his typewriter and hand it to his secretary than Valenti would somehow materialize, a nerve-worn courier, eager to personally express pages from Dick’s secretary into the president’s anxious hands. Johnson’s edits and penciled notations were incorporated into the text while he awaited the next installment, lashing out at everyone within range – everyone except Dick.

 

It soon became clear that the speech was no lawyer’s brief debating the merits of the bill soon to be sent to Congress. Rather, it was a credo of what we are as a nation, and who we are as a people – a redefining moment in our history brought forth by the foot soldiers of the Civil Rights Movement.

 

The real hero of this struggle is the American Negro. His actions and protests, his courage to risk safety and even to risk his life, have awakened the conscience of this nation.

 

….He has called upon us to make good the promise of America. And who among us can say that we would have made the same progress were it not for his persistent bravery, and his faith in American democracy.

 

…. As the light shifted across the room, Dick became aware that the day suddenly seemed to be rushing by. He opened the desk drawer, peered at the face of his watch, took a deep breath, and quickly slammed the drawer shut. For the first time that day he walked outside to get air and refresh his mind.

 

…. Already the sun was beginning to set that chilly March evening when the phone in Dick’s office rang for the first time that day. It was after six o’clock, past the deadline to feed all the finished pages of the speech into the teleprompter. The voice at the other end was ‘so calm, sweet, and sedate’ that Dick hardly recognized it as the voice of the president of the United States.

 

‘Far and away,’ Dick told me, ‘the gentlest tones I ever heard from Lyndon.’

 

‘You remember, Dick,’ Johnson said in a whisper, ‘that one of my first jobs after college was teaching young Mexican Americans in Cotulla. I told you about that down at the Ranch. I thought you might want to put in a reference to that,’ Dick recalled Johnson telling him.

 

What Johnson impressed on him, Dick told me, was that those kids in Cotulla had nothing. They had a hard, hard life. ‘Hell,’ he told Dick, ‘I spent half my pay to buy sports equipment for the school.’

 

Not twenty minutes had passed when the phone rang a second time. In that second call, Dick told me, Johnson was still musing about his time in Cotulla. ‘It was a long time ago,’ he said, ‘but those kids have their own kids. And now we do something about it.’

 

Hardly four minutes passed ad the phone rang a third time. ‘I almost forgot, Dick, L’d like you to ride up to the Hill with me tonight.’

 

‘When I finished,’ Dick recalled, ‘I felt perfectly blank. It was done. It was beyond revision. It was dark outside and I checked my wrist to see what time it was, remembered I had hidden my watch away from my sight, retrieved it from the drawer, and put it back on.’  “ 

 

I got the book after seeing an article by David Murray at Pro Rhetoric on September 3, 2024 titled Doris Kearns-Goodwin’s account of her husband Dick Goodwin’s political speechwriting career is fascinating and touching, both.

    

A portrait of LBJ came from Wikimedia Commons.