Showing posts with label teaching. Show all posts
Showing posts with label teaching. Show all posts

Monday, May 26, 2025

In his 2025 commencement address at the University of Maryland Kermit the Frog says to “leap together”


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On May 22, 2025 the famous puppet Kermit the Frog spoke. (His creator, Jim Henson, was an alumnus of that university) He’s the ultimate speech prop! An article from The Associated Press at npr on May 23, 2025 is titled ‘Leap together,’ Kermit the Frog says in address at the University of Maryland graduation. His three main points are about:

 

1] Finding your people

2] Taking the leap together

3] Making connections

 

You can watch a fifteen-minute Youtube video at PBS NewsHour titled WATCH LIVE: Kermit the Frog delivers commencement speech at University of Maryland. And on May 23, 2025 The Baltimore Sun has another article titled Transcript: Read Kermit the Frog’s University of Maryland commencement speech.

 

Kermit is voiced by Matt Vogel, as described on June 6, 2023 in a nineteen-minute Youtube video at Webster University titled Matt Vogel | Webster University Commencement Speech |2023.

 


Saturday, March 22, 2025

Is everyone really welcome here?



 

 

 

 

Recently in the Boise area there has been a continuing story regarding Sarah Inama, a 35-year-old world civilization teacher at Lewis and Clark Middle School in Meridian. She was told to take down posters which have been hanging in her class since she started working there four years ago. The story also was discussed in a nine-minute YouTube video from Chris Hayes at MSNBC on March 19, 2025 titled Idaho teacher fights back after order to remove ‘Everyone is Welcome Here’ poster.

 

The story was discussed in two articles by Brian Holmes at KTVB7one on March 11, 2025 titled West Ada School District teacher ordered to remove inclusive signs from classroom and another on March 12, 2025 titled West Ada issues sports analogy response to teacher told to remove ‘everyone is welcome here’ poster.

 

There also have been a series of brief YouTube videos at KTVB7. One on March 10, 2025 is titled Idaho teacher ordered to remove “Everyone is welcome here” sign from classroom. A second on March 12, 2025 is titled Idaho school district issues memo regarding teacher told to remove “Everyone Is Welcome Here” poster. A third on March 13, 2025 is titled Idaho school district responds after telling teacher to remove inclusive signage from classroom. A fourth on March 20, 2025 is titled ‘Everyone Is Welcome Here’ shirts made by the thousands opposing West Ada’s decision.

 

 

UPDATE March 23, 2025

 

I missed a fifth video from KTVB7 on March 17, 2025 titled “Everyone is welcome here’: Idaho organizations join Wassmuth Center campaign. On October 27, 2024 I blogged about A new building at Boise’s Wassmuth Center for Human Rights with quotations carved in stone.

 

Thursday, February 6, 2025

Making thinking visible is powerful


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Visible thinking is a powerful cognitive process whereby a person’s thoughts are represented externally to support further thought and communication. It is a three-step process: 1) Develop an internal thought; 2) Externally represent that internal thought; 3) Couple those external representations with ongoing internal thoughts to support further thoughts.

 

I have been looking at a 2020 book by Ron Ritchhart and Mark Church titled The Power of Making Thinking Visible: Practices to engage and empower all learners. There is a preview at Google Books.

 

An earlier article by Ron Ritchhart and David Perkins at Educational Leadership on February 2008, pages 57 to 61 that is titled Making Thinking Visible describes this topic, and includes the Compass Points routine that I have shown above via a PowerPoint graphic. There is a detailed collection from Project Zero of PZ’s Thinking Routines Toolbox.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 108 of the 2020 book shows another more detailed routine, Peeling the Fruit, which I have illustrated above via another colorful PowerPoint graphic.

 


Sunday, December 15, 2024

Whose Bible should we use in Idaho schools?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At the Idaho Statesman on November 27, 2024 there is a guest opinion from Blaine Conzatti of the Idaho Family Policy Center (repeated from their web site) titled The Bible should be read in Idaho’s public schools. History and tradition support it.

 

Then, on November 29, 2024 there was a reply from The Rev. Joseph Farne titled Episcopal rector: Which Bible will we put in Idaho classrooms? They aren’t the same | Opinion. As shown above, there are three Deuterocanonical books included in both the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox versions which were left out of the Protestant one.

 

Trumpists likely would tell us to use the Protestant God Bless the U.S.A. Bible, also known as the Trump Bible (King James version) which, of course, poses a major problem – it being from a foreign state religion (Church of England). Catholics will feel left out. And what about the quarter or so of the Idaho population who are LDS, and thus might want us to also read from the Book of Mormon?

 

UPDATE: December 27, 2024

 

There is a guest opinion by Rowan Astra in the Idaho Statesman on December 27, 2024 titled Idaho’s government is supposed to protect religious freedom, not promote a religion. It says the Idaho Family Policy Center wants student to have to listen to twenty verses a day from the King James version.   

 



Friday, December 13, 2024

A free 52-page e-book on How to Give a Great Speech or Presentation


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At the web site for the Association of Fundraising Professionals there is a useful and free 52-page e-book from 2019 by Wayne Olson on How to Give a Great Speech or Presentation. Its ten sections are:

 

To Speak Well – page 1

Elements of a Great Speech – page 7

Prepare for Success – Page 19

The Point in PowerPoint – Page 23

Putting It Together – Page 27

Appendix A [Sample Speaker Biography] – Page 29

Appendix B [Speechwriting Checklist] – Page 33

Appendix C [Day-of-Speech Checklist] – Page 35

Appendix D [PowerPoint (Keynote) Checklist] – Page 37

Bibliography and Sources for Further Reading – Page 39

 

The image was adapted from one at Openclipart.

 


Sunday, November 24, 2024

Considering five types of speeches

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a relatively brief article by Diane Windingland on pages 10 and 11 of the November 2024 issue of Toastmaster magazine titled Exploring 5 types of speeches. She discusses informative, persuasive, entertaining, demonstrative, and ceremonial ones, and which is the best type for your goal.

 

What is missing? There is no link to educational material from Toastmasters. But at Toastmasters NZ you can find a .pdf file of the current Pathways Level 3 Project on Persuasive Speaking. And elsewhere from the former Advanced Communication Series you can download .pdf files of The Entertaining Speaker, Speaking to Inform, and Special Occasion Speeches. There is an article about the Special Occasion Speeches manual by Maureen Zappala on pages 22 to 25 of the December 2016 issue of Toastmaster magazine titled It’s a Special Occasion.

 

Also, at the APSU Writing Center for Austin Peay State University you can download .pdf files for Informative Speech, Persuasive Speech, and Demonstrative Speech.

 

Of course, as I blogged about on October 5, 2024 in a post titled Free 2023 e-book on Public Speaking as Performance you can download an e-book with entire chapters on informative, persuasive, and special occasion speeches.  

 

 


Saturday, June 15, 2024

Is there much wrong with public education in Idaho?

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Heck no. Conservatives like the Idaho Freedom Foundation like to disparage and belittle Idaho’s public school system. And on June 9, 2024 there is an article by Bob ‘Nugie’ Neugebauer at the Gem State Patriot News on June 9, 2024 titled What’s wrong with public education in Idaho? (and subtitled The Case for School Choice). His first two paragraphs say:

 

“I’m not sure how many times I have to say this but if you want to solve the problems of our school system, parents need to start by attending the school board meetings and voting for conservative board members. It’s interesting that Idaho is still at the bottom of the scale nationally when it comes to K-12 education spending at $8,100 per student, considering we spend over $3 billion on public education, which is about 55% of the state budget. Yet even spending that huge sum of money, we do not get the bang for our buck as taxpayers.

 

The question is why do we rank so low for spending eight thousand per pupil while Utah spends about the same and is ranked number 2 in the country in K-12?”

 

In the second paragraph he incorrectly referred to another article at U.S. News, which actually ranked Utah at #6 for PreK-12, and at #2 considering both PreK-12 and Higher Education.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What’s interesting is where we rank relative to all six of our neighbors, not just Utah. For PreK-12 those rankings actually are:

 

Utah #6

Wyoming #19

Idaho #23

Montana #27

Washington #32

Oregon #44

Nevada #45

 

We rank #23 (in the top half) which is not so low – and third among our neighbors. And considering both PreK-12 and Higher Education the rankings are:

 

Utah #2

Wyoming #7

Washington #13

Idaho #18

Montana #22

Nevada #37

Oregon #40

 

We rank #18 (again in the top half) which is not so low – and fourth among our neighbors (right in the middle).

 

How about his claim “we do not get the bang for our buck as taxpayers.”  An article by Jason Bedrick and Jonathan Butcher from a conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation, on

September 16, 2022 is instead titled Heritage Foundation finds Idaho schools deliver biggest bang for the buck. Then there was yet another article by Ronald N. Nate at the Idaho Freedom Foundation on December 7, 2023 titled Losing Streak – Idaho Educational Freedom. I blogged about it on December 9, 2023 in a post titled Did Idaho’s educational freedom have a losing streak? For Return on Investment, we and our neighbors ranked as follows (with an amazing top trifecta!):

 

Idaho #1

Utah #2

Nevada #3

Washington #8

Montana #26

Oregon #39

Wyoming #41

 

And the overall rankings were:

 

Utah #3

Idaho #11

Montana #17

Nevada #23

Wyoming #34

Washington #43

Oregon #51

 

The school cartoon came from Openclipart.

 


Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Membership in Toastmasters International is not free, but at $10 per month is an excellent value


 

 

 

 

 

At rollingout on April 14, 2024 there is an article by Mr. Digital Fingers titled 4 clubs or groups to join free to improve your public speaking.

 

He lists the following four:

 

1] Toastmasters International

2] Meetup Public Speaking Groups

3] Online Public Speaking Communities

4] Local Libraries and Community Centers

 

But he is wrong about that first item. Toastmasters International is not free, although it is an excellent value. Their web page on How to Join says that there is a cost of $60 for semi-annual international dues, plus a $20 new member fee. That continuing $60, or just $10 per month is inexpensive. (There also may be additional club dues. At the Pioneer Club I belong to in Boise they are another $6 semi-annually, or $1 per month.)

 

Back on July 15, 2010 I blogged about how Public speaking training is a journey; You get to choose how to go.

 

An image of dollar bills was cropped from one at Openclipart.

 


Tuesday, February 20, 2024

Learning about public speaking from a sandwich artist, a sportscaster, and an accountant

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

There is an interesting article by Bobby Powers titled What a sandwich artist, a sportscaster, and an accountant taught me about public speaking. It’s wonderful how you can learn from very different people. (I have learned from a veterinarian, a novelist, and an electrical engineer).

 

His seven tips are:

 

Use stories as your Trojan Horse.

Create villains for your audience to hate.

Beware the curse of knowledge.

Paint vivid mental pictures.

Embrace the power of silence.

Practice twice as much as you normally would.

Fly at multiple altitudes.

 

A sportscaster taught him to replace filler words with pauses. And an accountant taught him about the Curse of Knowledge (not remembering when you didn’t know a subject inside out). Back on November 6, 2009 I blogged about Knowledge, consciousness, and curses.

 

Images of sandwich makers, a sportscaster and an auditor all were adapted from Wikimedia Commons.

 


Monday, February 19, 2024

A TikTok video on five public speaking myths includes a bogus fear statistic and a bogus Mark Twain quote

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you want to dispel myths, then you shouldn’t state some more. At TikTok on February 13, 2024 there is a two-and-a-half minute teaching video by Trophy Kiprono (a coach from Nairobi, Kenya) titled 5 things they lied to you about public speaking. Her text claims:

 

“According to the National Institute of Mental Health, it is estimated that close to 73% of the world’s population has a fear of public speaking. Here’s the good news in that statistic. If you have fears around public speaking, you are in good, large company.”

 

But 73% is baseless nonsense from Statistic Brain, which I discussed on August 14, 2020 in a blog post titled Toastmaster magazine is spreading nonsense from John Bowe about how common the fear of public speaking is.

 

Her video mostly contains reasonable advice. A transcript with punctuation and capitalization added is:

 

“Let’s talk about some common public speaking myths that we need to dispel now. Because of the fear that surrounds public speaking there’s a lot of myths surrounding it.

 

The first myth is that great speakers are born that way. It’s a myth that great speakers are born with the ability to connect confidently and easily with a room full of people. The truth is anyone who aspires and desires and decides to improve their public speaking skills can do so. It’s a learnable skill, it’s like riding a bicycle which can be achieved through training, commitment, determination, and most importantly practicing.  

 

The second myth surrounding public speaking is that experienced speakers don’t feel nervous. As you develop your public speaking skills, your pre-presentation anxiety lessens. The truth is your nerves will never go away completely, if you’re about to give a presentation you genuinely care about. Experienced speakers simply learn how to control, manage, and even harness their nerves to help them rather than hinder them. As Mark Twain once said, ‘There are two types of speakers – those that are nervous and those that are liars.’       

 

The third common myth out there is that only extroverts make good public speakers. No, that’s not a fact. Your personality doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter if you’re an introvert, an extrovert, an ambivert, or any other type out there. All you need is something important to say that will make a difference to others. A belief that what you have to say needs to be heard. A passion for what you believe in, and finally a conviction to express your passion and share your message.

 

The fourth myth out there is that you have to be perfect. Anxiety increases substantially when you strive for perfection. The greatest presenters know that, so they don’t try to go for an Oscar winning performance. Instead they know that their job is simply to be the best of who they are, with the sole intention of making a difference to their audience rather than making themselves look like ‘superstars.’

 

The [fifth] final myth is that you need to memorize your speech. Your audience don’t want to hear a sleek polished presenter who has memorized everything. It’s a myth that’s ‘theatre.’ Your audience want to hear someone speak, someone who knows what they’re talking about, someone who cares about what they’re saying, someone who makes their audience care too. You don’t need to memorize your speech. This will do both you and your audience more harm than good.

 

I hope these tips help.”

 

But under the second myth she includes a bogus Mark Twin quote. On May 12, 2020 I blogged about Did Mark Twain really say there were just nervous speakers or liars?

 

The image was adapted from this one at Openclipart.

 


Friday, February 16, 2024

Laura Bergells article on Unconventional Ways to Improve Public Speaking

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At LinkedIn Pulse on February 13, 2024 there is an interesting article by Laura Bergells titled Embrace the Weirdness! Unconventional Ways to Improve Public Speaking. One way she mentions and pictures is practicing with books on your head to improve posture. That’s listed in TVtropes and shown at Getty Images. You could instead try a roll of paper, as shown above.

 

She noted that a technique like holding your arms up with palms out would initially feel weird. But that looks open, versus a closed gesture of crossing your arms.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another weird way might be to (as shown above) give your speech while sitting down on the floor or stage. Gestures will feel different!

 

Images were adapted from the 1905 book by Lina Beard and Adelia B. Beard titled How to Amuse Yourself and Others (pages 378 and 252) from Wikimedia Commons.

 


Friday, January 26, 2024

Ten lessons from teaching the public about shark science and conservation

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At Southern Fried Science on January 18, 2024 there is a very interesting article by David Shiffman titled Lessons learned from teaching the public about shark science and conservation: Insights from my SICB Plenary. (SICB is the acronym of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology). David says that:

 

 1] Public science engagement is good for science, good for the public, and good for you … when done effectively.

 2] No one owes you their eyeballs.

 3] Storytelling is more effective than a list of dry facts … and while facts will always matter, an infodump cannot be the sole focus of your public engagement.

 4] Saying that your research is important (for conservation, or otherwise) does not make it so.

 5] Not every individual unit of science needs to be communicated to the public.

 6] Unilateral disarmament doesn’t win battles, but you do not have to participate in every fight you are invited to.

 7] Know (and use) the right tool for the job, but tools by themselves are not a strategy. You need a strategy.

 8] Treat your audience with respect. That includes how you carry yourself, how you respond to questions, and your word choice re: jargon.

 9] Sometimes the messenger matters as much as the message … or more.

10] Professional need not mean stuffy and boring. This stuff should be fun!

 

There is recent brief article at NOAA Fisheries on July 28, 2023 titled Debunking common shark myths. There also is long, earlier article (32 pages in pdf) by David S. Shiffman et al. at iScience on June 17, 2020 titled Inaccurate and biased global media coverage underlies public misunderstanding of shark conservation threats and solutions.

 

An image of a shark was adapted from this one by Diego Delso featured at Wikimedia Commons.

 


Monday, April 17, 2023

A great video course on Epic Engineering Failures and the Lessons They Teach


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For a couple decades much of what I did as a metallurgical engineering consultant involved failure analysis – figuring out why things busted or rusted. Recently I saw that The Great Courses had a new one (released in 2022) by Stephen Ressler titled Epic Engineering Failures and the Lessons They Teach. I put it on hold from the Ada Community Library, and greatly enjoyed watching all 26 lectures on 5 DVDs. Professor Ressler is a great storyteller, and uses excellent simplified working models that show how the structures were meant to work, and how they instead failed. 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For example, on July 17, 1981 in Kansas City, collapse of the walkways in the atrium of the Hyatt Regency Hotel killed 114 people. A design detail change (shown above) that doubled the load applied to steel support rods hanging the beams was not caught, due to a series of failures of both communication and coordination.  

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How the process of structural design should work is shown above via a chart (adapted from one in the course). The structural response was tragically underestimated.

 

What the structural engineer had designed would have been very difficult to build. The steel fabricator proposed a change, and spoke with the structural engineer’s project manager. He asked them to put it in writing, but they didn’t, and he forgot to follow up on their shop drawing. Then the steel fabricator hired an outside engineering firm, who assumed the hanger connection already had been analyzed, and never checked it. The fabricator sent the completed drawings to the structural engineer. Drawings instead were reviewed by a senior technician who hadn’t previously worked on the project. He was unaware of the changed configuration, and didn’t raise concerns about it. It also was missed in a design review by Kansas City Public Works.

 

Each of the 26 lectures could be the basis for a speech about failure analysis. Titles for those lectures are as follows (with dates and links to the appropriate Wikipedia pages from their List of structural failures and collapses):

 

1] Learning from Failure: three vignettes [Hurricane Katrina, the Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse, and the Dee Bridge Collapse]

 

2] Flawed Design Concept: the Dee Bridge [1847]

 

3] Wind Loading: The Tay Bridge [1879]

 

4] Rainwater Loading: Kemper Arena [1979]

 

5] Earthquake Loading: The Cypress Structure [1989]

 

6] Vehicle Collisions: The Sunshine Skyway Collapse [1980] and The Skagit River Bridge Collapse [2013]

 

7] Blast Loading: The Murrah Federal Building [1995]

 

8] Structural Response: The Hyatt Regency Walkways [1981]

 

9] Bridge Aerodynamics: Galloping Gertie [Tacoma Narrows Bridge 1940]

 

10] Dynamic Response: London’s Wobbly Bridge [Millennium Footbridge 2000]

 

11] Dynamic Response: Boston’s Plywood Palace [John Hancock Tower 1973]

 

12] Stone Masonry: Beauvais Cathedral [1284]

 

13] Experiment in Iron: The Ashtabula Bridge [1876]

 

14] Shear in Concrete: The FIU Pedestrian Bridge [2018]

 

15] House of Cards: Ronan Point [1968]

 

16] Brittle Fracture: The Great [Boston] Molasses Flood [1919]  

 

17] Stress Corrosion: The Silver Bridge [1967]

 

18] Soil and Settlement: The Leaning Tower of Pisa [1990]

 

19] Water in Soil: The Teton Dam Collapse [1976]

 

20] Construction Engineering: Two Failed Lifts – Senior Road Tower [1982] and L’Ambiance Plaza collapse [1987]

 

21] Maintenance Malpractice: The Mianus River Bridge [1983]

 

22] Decision Making: The [Space Shuttle] Challenger Disaster[1986]

 

23] Nuclear Meltdown: Chernobyl [1986]

 

24] Blowout: Deepwater Horizon [2010]

 

25] Corporate Culture: The Boeing 737 MAX [2019]

 

26 Learning from Failure: Hurricane Katrina [2005]

 

My only major criticism of the course concerns Lecture 17, Stress Corrosion: The Silver Bridge. Failure of a single eyebar, via growth of a hidden small crack, led to a complete collapse because there was no structural redundancy.

 

The Glossary in the Course Guidebook gives the following incorrect definition for stress corrosion:

 

“A phenomenon in which the gradual accumulation of corrosion product (rust) within the grain boundaries of a metal causes tiny cracks to form. Stress corrosion occurs when the metal is subjected to tension stress in a corrosive environment.”

 

For stress corrosion cracking the crack path can be either along the grain (crystal) boundaries or across the crystals (transgranular). For chlorides in stainless steels, it commonly is across, as discussed in the web page at Corrosion Doctors for Stress Corrosion Cracking. Also see the Corrosion Doctors web page for the Silver Bridge Collapse, and the Wikipedia page on Stress corrosion cracking.   

 

Images of the Hyatt Regency Walkway collapse and connection details both came from Wikimedia Commons.  

 


Sunday, February 5, 2023

Reducing excessive use of filler words in scientific speech


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a serious article by Douglas R. Seals and McKinley E. Coppock in Advances in Physiology Education (2022, Volume 46, number 4, pages 615 to 620) titled We, um, have, like, a problem: excessive use of fillers in scientific speech which also can be downloaded for free as a six-page .pdf file. I broke the abstract into sections rather than its original single paragraph format. It says that:

 

“A filler is any word or sound that interpolates (i.e., is inserted into) the main message of a speaker. Common fillers include ‘um’, ‘ah’, ‘like’, ‘so’, and ‘you know?’ among others.

 

Excessive use of fillers in scientific presentations can reduce the credibility of the speaker as well as impair the comprehension of the speaker’s message by the audience.

 

Primary causes of fillers include nervousness/speaking too quickly, inadequate preparation time, and infrequently used words that are difficult for the speaker to remember while presenting.

 

Recommendations for reducing the use of fillers include self-awareness of the problem, reinforcing feedback, and active intervention to render pauses silent (instead of verbal) by ‘chunking’ content, increasing preparation time, and slowing presentation pace.

 

Excessive use of fillers is an obstacle to becoming an effective public speaker, and therefore efforts to reduce filler use should be a goal of professional development.”

 

A next-to-final section in the text headed One step at a time warns us:

 

“When emphasizing improved public speaking skills in the context of professional development, it is important to remember that it is not necessary to eliminate filler use in an initial effort but rather to reduce the frequency of use as a first step and then progressively work toward elimination. It also is important to recognize that improving public speaking skills, including reducing use of fillers, may be more challenging for certain individuals and groups. For example, some individuals whose first language is not English initially might find it challenging to present in that language. Similarly, some trainees with disorders of fluency, such as a stutter, and others with a fear of public speaking might need additional guidance, time, and space to improve their oral presentation skills. The reality is, all trainees and faculty, regardless of circumstances and level of training, benefit from empathy, mentoring, encouragement, and opportunities to enhance their scientific speech and public speaking abilities.”

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is an unfortunate tendency by some (including Toastmasters) to demand immediate total elimination of filler words. I call them Filler Word Daleks, after the xenophobic mutants in the Doctor Who science fiction television program, whose favorite word is Exterminate!

 

For example, a blog post by Esther Snippe at SpeakerHub on January 30, 2017 titled Stop “Um-ing” (and using other filler words) proclaims:

 

“Public speaking experts strongly recommend eliminating these words and phrases completely, keeping your talk clear and succinct — without distractions.”

 

The image of a Dalek came from here at Wikimedia Commons.

 


Thursday, June 30, 2022

Yet more from Patrick Barry on writing – Parallel Structure

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On June 28, 2022, I blogged about Even more from Patrick Barry on writing – Writing as Mapping. Professor Barry also has another half-dozen YouTube videos from his spring 2016 writing workshops for University of Michigan law students, about Parallel Structure which total to under 16 minutes. They are:

 

Parallel Structure: Dickinson, Frost, and Pope (0:55)

 

Parallel Structure: Corresponding ideas in corresponding forms (2:15)

 

Parallel Structure: Name that tune (2:33)

 

Parallel Structure: Leonardo DaVinci, Michaelangelo, and the Apple Store (1:54)

 

Parallel Structure: Better at words (5:22)

 

Parallel Structure: Better writer - better lawyer (2:19)

 


Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Even more from Patrick Barry on writing – Writing as Mapping

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earlier today I blogged about Still more from Patrick Barry on writing – The Force of Focus. Professor Barry (who also has a PhD in English) has a half-dozen more YouTube videos, all about Writing as Mapping. They came from workshops for University of Michigan law students in the fall of 2018.  You can watch all six in about eleven minutes. They are:

 

Writing as Mapping: the power of description (2:13)

 

Writing as Mapping: conscious strategies and unconscious assumptions (1:45)

 

Writing as Mapping: Greenland vs. Africa (1:52)

 

Writing as Mapping: Saul Steinberg and The New Yorker (0:35)

 

Writing as Mapping: Gall-Peters (1:13)

 

Writing as Mapping: political maps (3:12)

 

An image of famous African explorer David Livingstone holding a map came from the Library of Congress.