Showing posts with label audience size. Show all posts
Showing posts with label audience size. Show all posts

Friday, September 1, 2023

On August 26, 2023 this blog had a gigantic spike in page views, with 27.6 times the annual average


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Because this blog is not commercial, I don’t look hard at the number of page views I’m getting each day. But on August 26th something quite amazing happened. As shown above, there were 12,295 views – which is 27.6 times the annual average of 446 per day. What on earth had happened?

 

On August 25th I had blogged about how Preaching is a very special form of public speaking. As is usual, I had put that post at the Public Speaking group on LinkedIn (my only ‘advertising’ for the blog). The group owner, James Feudo, recommended it – which meant it was featured pinned at the top of the page rather than moving down after newer posts appeared. It has received over 134 impressions. That presumably led a lot of people to my blog. 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What about the long term? As shown above, there only have been two months, June 2016 and July 2023 when this blog has averaged over 2000 page views per day.

 

I started Joyful Public Speaking after I joined Toastmasters International. As I learned about public speaking, I wanted to reach further than the ~20 people in a typical club. Just on August 26th the blog reached ~615 times that number of people.

 

On June 7, 2021 I blogged about how Your speech has more reach than you think. In that post I discussed John Zimmer’s notion that you should multiply the time for your speech by the number of people in your audience. I called it the reach, in units of person-minutes. LinkedIn estimated the reading time for my blog post on preaching at 2 minutes, so its reach would similarly be 24,590 person-minutes or 409.8 person-hours, or 17.08 person-days.

  


Wednesday, July 26, 2023

Whiteboards or flipcharts are more powerful than PowerPoint for a boardroom presentation

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At her Maniactive blog on July 18, 2023 Laura Bergells has a post titled Ditch Your Slides! Draw on the Power of Whiteboard Talks. She describes the impact of a whiteboard talk (rather than the PowerPoint you might use in a larger room) these four ways:

 

Showcase your personality

Amplify engagement

Visual storytelling

Flexibility and adaptability

 

With a small audience you can do a more spontaneous and interactive presentation by drawing on a whiteboard or blackboard. But a flipchart is arguably better than either, since you can answer questions by going back to a previously drawn page.  

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is no magic rewind button on a blackboard or whiteboard. One you erase, it is only a memory.  

 

Back on October 21, 2019 I blogged about the Impact of audience size on presentation style. And way back on January 16, 2008 at The Extreme Presentation Method Andrew Abela blogged about Ballroom vs. Conference Room Style Presentations. A large (ballroom) versus small (conference room or boardroom) is a useful distinction for venues.

 

On July 15, 2015 I blogged about Is a small audience one where the speaker doesn’t need a microphone? In that post I mentioned that:

 

“There are two types of people – those who divide things into two categories, and those who don’t.”

 

I belong to the second type, and mentioned different audience sizes classified by powers of 2 from zero (two people conversing, perhaps in a phone booth) to twenty (a visit from the Pope with an audience of 1,048,576).  

 

My two images were modified from those of a boardroom and a historical blackboard at Wikimedia Commons.

 


Tuesday, November 15, 2022

The ultimate speech audience is all eight billion people on earth


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I saw an article by Katia Riddle and Rachel Treisman at NPR on November 15, 2022 titled There now are eight billion people on earth, according to a new U.N. report. Suppose we sat them all down in one place so they could listen to a speech.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back on November 21, 2017 I blogged about Is a large audience one where the speaker needs a microphone? Is a small audience one where everyone can see a flipchart? As shown above, in that post I allotted an area of nine square feet per person. Eight billion people would occupy 72,000,000,000 square feet, or 2,582.64 square miles, or a square 50.82 miles on a side. That’s not as large area as one might guess, considering that the state of Delaware covers 2,488.72 square miles.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In that previous post I had a table showing power of two, audience size, distance, and venue. The revised version shown above takes it to the limit – two to the 33rd power, which is over the world population of eight billion.  

 

If instead we had standing room only the answer even could be smaller. There is an article in the Washington Post by Ana Swanson on April 2, 2015 titled The entire world fits in New York City.


 

An image of the world and people came from Openclipart.

 


Monday, June 7, 2021

Your speech has more reach than you might think

 

At his Manner of Speaking blog on May 24, 2021 John Zimmer has an excellent post titled Do this calculation every time you speak in public. (He talked about this topic previously on February 26, 2016 in another post titled Every time you have to give a speech or make a presentation, do this calculation). John says to multiply your speaking time by the number of people who will be in the audience. He calls this the true amount of your speaking time. Doing the calculation will make you focus on your audience, each of whom are giving you their valuable time. For example, as he discussed in the earlier post, at work you might speak for 30 minutes to an audience of 20 people in your department for a total time of 600 minutes or 10 hours.  

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I instead call it the reach of your speech, in units of person-minutes - a product illustrated above in a graphic via the area of a purple rectangle. As a retired engineer, I think it’s important to carry along the units. That process is known as Dimensional Analysis. I blogged about it on November 25, 2020 in a post titled A million times too large.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How about a 60 minute speech to an audience of 120 people? Now the reach is 7200 person-minutes, or 120 person-hours, or 5 person-days. That’s huge! (Industrial engineers used to talk about man-hours, which are a sexist form of person-hours). Back on June 22, 2015 I blogged about Visualizing emotional equations with PowerPoint or flipcharts and also showed multiplication as an area to illustrate how Authenticity = Self-Awareness x Courage.

 


Sunday, January 10, 2021

Do more people fear speaking to large or to small audiences?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On November 21, 2017 I blogged about Is a large audience one where the speaker needs a microphone? Is a small audience one where everyone can see a flipchart? Based on their personal experiences some find smaller audiences more intimidating than larger ones.

 

An article by John C. Bastian on August 20, 2020 titled The stage fright paradox said that more people in the audience was better (less frightening than a small audience). A second undated article by Mike Brown at Lifehack titled 11 Paradoxes of being a better public speaker says the first paradox is to minimize your nerves by looking for as big an audience as possible. He claims:

 

“….the more people in the audience, the smaller amount of your nervousness each member of the audience has to absorb. The theory may sound silly, but with more people in the audience, there’s a greater likelihood of spotting individuals who get your message and show it in their eyes….”

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think that with more people in the audience you also would find people outraged by your message who demonstrate their disdain, as shown above. (On January 16, 2016 I had blogged about What percent of your speech audience really likes you? The 20-60-20 rule). A third article by Scott Fenstermaker titled Everything you’ve been taught about public speaking is a myth says the tenth myth is to Start with small audiences and work up to big ones. (I commented on it in December 2014). Scott adds that you should:

 

“…remember that speaking for a small group of people you know and whose faces you can see might be more freaky than speaking in front of an auditorium full of strangers.”  

 

A fourth article by Al Williams at Medium on July 30, 2020 titled A Surprising Public Speaking Secret says in more detail:

 

“But here’s a secret that not many people know about me: if I have any stage fright, it isn’t in front of 1,000 people. It is in front of two people.

 

Think about it. If you are in a room with 1,000 people, most of them can’t see you very well. Half of them at any given time are thinking about dinner or their vacation or their bills. If you misspeak, trip, or even say something wrong, there is a good chance most of the people won’t even notice.

 

Now imagine you are in your office with your boss and one coworker. You have their total attention. If you mess up, they will know. If you tell your boss something wrong, she’s very likely to call you on it right there.

 

So that’s the liberating secret that helped my CEO friend. You lose yourself in a large audience. So if you want to have nerves, save them for the small presentations.”

 

Most of my experience has been with small audiences. Based on less familiarity with them, I have more fear of large ones. Last year’s version of the Wikipedia article on the pseudo-technical term glossophobia includes a statement (not in the current version) that:

 

“The speaker may be comfortable if they speak in front of a group of complete strangers, but when it comes to speaking in front of family/friends, their anxiety skyrockets, and vice versa. Some speakers are more comfortable in larger groups, and some are more comfortable speaking to smaller groups.”

 

Is there better evidence contrasting large or small audience? Yes! I found three surveys with data on percentages who fear them - and more people fear large audiences. 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back in 1977 Philip G. Zimbardo published a book titled Shyness: What it is and what to do about it. On February 3, 2014 I blogged about it in a post titled Busting a myth – that 75% of people in the world fear public speaking. A shown above via a bar chart, he found that (When I am focus of attention) 73% were shy in a large group (as when giving a speech), but only 52% were shy in a small group.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In 1996 there was a magazine article titled Public-Speaking Fears in a Community Sample which described a survey of 499 people done in a Canadian city. I blogged about it on June 20, 2011 in a post titled Public speaking fears in Winnipeg. As shown above via a bar chart,  167 or 33.5% were much more nervous than other people when they were speaking to a large audience (had a substantial fear of public speaking). Of those who did, only 59 or 11.8% of the total sample rated themselves as much more nervous than other people when they were speaking to a small group of familiar people.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In May 1998 there was another magazine article by Ronald C. Kessler, Murray B. Stein, and Patricia Berglund titled Social Phobia Subtypes in the National Comorbidity Survey published in the American Journal of Psychiatry. I blogged about it on November 2, 2008 in a post titled Public speaking is still the #1 specific social fear, according to the latest results from the NCS-R survey. As shown above via a bar chart, 30.2% feared public speaking, while 15.2% (half as many) feared talking in front of a small group.  

  

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On November 5, 2017 at Manner of Speaking John Zimmer posted an article titled The public speaking fear grid with four quadrants based both on size and familiarity. My version (shown above) adds axis labels. John made suggestions about how to become comfortable in each of those four quadrants. Members of a Toastmasters club may find a club meeting is a small audience of people they know. For a large audience they might try presenting at a Toastmasters Leadership Institute (TLI) given by a Division, or even a District Conference (I have done both).

 

I have spoken to small audiences I didn’t know (insurance claims adjusters), about lamp analysis after vehicle accidents. On January 21, 2020 I blogged about it in a post titled The right prop can pull your presentation skyward. For me the most intimidating situation was a large audience with many people I knew – a couple hundred at an international conference about hydrogen embrittlement of metals.    

 

Images of large and small audiences came from the Library of Congress. A cartoon with a disdainful audience was adapted from a 1908 Puck magazine at the Library of Congress.

 


Sunday, March 29, 2020

Spitting distance



























On March 27, 2020 Randall Munroe posted the xkcd web cartoon shown above titled 6-foot zone, which is his Guide to the 6’ Social Distancing Zone. He humorously claimed that eight horses could fit inside that circle with you. A discussion at the Explain XKCD web site notes there is not really an Equestrian Design Handbook from the U.S. Forest Service.




























Randall had described the zone as a circle with an area of 145 square feet. As shown above, this corresponds to a radius of 6.8 feet. But social distance just is a polite euphemism for quantifying spitting distance. That is how the Prime Minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern, explained it, as was reported by Josie Adams at The Spinoff on March 17, 2020 in an article titled Covid-19: everything you need to know about social distancing:

“In yesterday’s post-cabinet press conference, the prime minister defined social distancing as remaining outside of spitting distance of those around you. Social distancing is defined by the United States’ Centers for Disease Control as keeping a distance of six feet or two metres between you and another person…”




























On November 21, 2017 I blogged about audience sizes in a post titled Is a large audience one where the speaker needs a microphone? Is a small audience where everyone can see a flipchart? In that post I noted, as shown above, that a square 12 feet on a side (with 144 square feet, or almost the same area as that circle), could hold a seated audience of 16 people. I described that audience size as being a boardroom.  

Monday, October 21, 2019

Impact of audience size on presentation style
































How you present should change depending on audience size. On November 21, 2017 I blogged about Is a large audience on where a speaker needs a microphone? Is a small audience one where everyone can see a flipchart? As shown above, presenting to 16 people in a board room can and should be way less formal than presenting to 128 people in a university lecture hall (with a stage, lectern, and microphone). Small hand gestures will be visible in a board room.   

At The Illinois Model on April 19, 2019 Lou Hayes, jr. had an article titled Presentation Hack: Impact of Audience Size. Lou described how a usually impressive presenter tried to keep the same style he had used for an auditorium with 500 people in a class with 40 students. It did not work well.


































Then he discussed how you can engage more with smaller audiences. He noted you also can change room layouts to other seating types like ‘town hall’ or 'horseshoe' (like a conference room minus the center table), as shown above.


Wednesday, October 3, 2018

Advantages and disadvantages of speaking ‘in the round’


















At Medium on September 26, 2018 there was an article by Andy Nulman with the confusing title of Don’t Fear the Sphere and a clearer subtitle of How to speak in the round without going around in circles. A typical ‘in the round’ layout is shown above.

I found three other articles about speaking in the round. On October 16, 2015 Victoria Tomlinson of Northern Lights PR described her 9 tips for presentations ‘in the round.’ On February 18, 2016 at LinkedIn Pulse Adrian Kirk discussed Speaking in the Round – how to master the trickiest of public speaking platforms. Kristin Arnold at Powerful Panels also had three articles on Theater-in-the-Round: Speaking and Presenting Effectively. Think carefully about the following ten points before you attempt this difficult layout:

1]  What are the advantages? First, there is a shorter distance between speaker and audience than for a typical room layout, with all the audience on one side. Second, that closeness make the presentation more conversational.   



2]  What are the biggest disadvantages? Half the audience can’t see your face or frontal hand gestures.



3]  Should I try to spin around? No. Unless you are either a gymnast or a skater, you just will get dizzy and fall down, and look foolish.













4]  Should I plan to walk around the stage? Yes, Adrian Kirk has discussed three possible patterns (shown above).



5]  Does this round stage make my butt look big? It sure does. Get over it!



6]  Should I wear a basic black dress or a charcoal suit? Heck no! Don’t dress like a ninja - you just will blend into a dark background.



7]  Will I have a lectern to put notes on? Probably not, but you may have a small round table at the center of the stage.






















8]  Will I have prompting or confidence monitors? Maybe - they probably will be at the edges of the stage, as shown above.
























9]  Will there be screens for viewing video or PowerPoint? Maybe, either in a square cluster above the stage or up on the four side walls, as is shown above.  






















10]  Will the stage revolve slowly, like the restaurants at the Space Needle or Tower of the Americas? Perhaps. Be sure to ask beforehand.

Saturday, April 14, 2018

Right and wrong room setups


















The January – February 2018 issue of Speaker magazine has a one-page article by Alan R. Zimmerman titled Smart Room Setups. He says you should plan ahead to get the right one. If you don’t you might wind up with something very wrong - like the century-old railroad car shown above (with 12 rows of seats, each for just four people). Alan’s article has a .pdf file download showing nine different setups for a wide range of audience sizes:

Boardroom (21)

Theater Curved Rows (30)

Small Group Rounds (35)

Classroom-Style with 2 aisles (36)

Small Group Angled Tables (40)

Classroom-Style with one aisle (60)

U-Shaped (72 )

Theater Style U-Shaped (254)

Theater (for 500+)

The 1903 railroad car interior came from Wikimedia Commons.

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Is a large audience one where the speaker needs a microphone? Is a small audience one where everyone can see a flipchart?










































Our terminology is vague, and assumes people magically know what our dichotomy means. Is a small audience where everyone can see a flipchart? Is a large audience where the speaker needs a microphone?

On November 8, 2017 at Ethos3 there was an article by Stephanie Fulton titled Public Speaking Tips for Speaking to a Large or Small Audience. She referred to a September 28, 2017 article by Anett Grant in The Business Journals titled 3 differences between speaking to large groups and small groups. Anett discussed Movement, Concentration Level, and Style. Under Style she said:

You may think that the larger your audience is, the ‘bigger’ your style needs to be — that you need to be larger than life to grab the attention of a big crowd. In reality, the opposite is true. If you’re speaking to a large group, your style should be more personal — especially if you’re being projected onto a screen. The audience doesn’t need to be drawn to you because the camera is already giving them a close-up.





















The ‘especially’ is confusing. Back on June 16, 2010 I had blogged about how Gesture size usually should match audience size, and showed the above graphic to illustrate how projected live video changed things. On October 19, 2016 Anett had a longer, clearer Fast Company article titled 5 Speaking Habits You Need To Adjust Depending On The Size Of Your Audience.

Another dichotomy is via room sizes, like boardrooms and ballrooms. In his The Extreme Presentation Method blog back on January 16, 2008 Andrew Abela posted about Ballroom vs. Conference Room Style Presentations.

How many people can be in an audience before you need a microphone? In his 2001 book 10 Days to More Confident Public Speaking on page 63 Lenny Laskowski says that:

“…speaking to a group of more than fifty people requires a microphone and a good sound system.”

Others divide audiences into more than two groups. In an article titled Size Up Your Audience by Cliff Suttle on pages 18 to 20 of the December 2007 Toastmaster magazine he used four –

“Here’s the basic breakdown:

Talking to 10 people or fewer is a conversation.

Getting up in front of 20 people is a speech.

If there are 40 people in the audience, it’s a performance.

100 people or more is a show.”



























Anthropologist Edward T. Hall used four distances to discuss different types of spaces (Proxemics), as shown above. Can we relate audience size to distance?



















As shown above, we can assume that (for dense, theater seating in a square room) a person requires a 3 by 3 foot square, so the distance will be the square root of 9 times the audience size. I first discussed this in a December 7, 2008 blog post titled Audience size determines working distance and thus presentation style.










































When we look at audience sizes defined by different powers of two, we can make a table relating audience size, distance, and venue name, as shown above. 21 types will cover the range of audiences from one to about a million. I first discussed this in a December 6, 2008 blog post titled Your presentation style should match both your intent and the size of your audience. Hall’s four types of spaces fit neatly into the table. Many other audience sizes don’t have venue names though.

Real venues usually are not square, may have stages, and they will offer event planners a variety of seating options. A speaker needs to check on how his room will be set up. For example, at the Riverside Hotel here in Boise the 76’ x 120’ Grand Ballroom could be set up with Theater seats for 1000, Round tables for 600, or as a Classroom for 500. The 27’ x 15’ Garnet meeting room could be set up with Theater seats for 40 or Conference seats for 20.  


Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Is a small audience one where the speaker doesn’t need a microphone?





















At the LinkedIn Public Speaking Network group there was a thread started on July 1st by Tsufit which asked:

“Do you prefer speaking to a LARGE audience or a small INTIMATE audience? Why?”

But, she didn’t define either large or small. Also, on June 30th there was another by Ian Brownlee which linked to an excellent blog post about Presenting to Small vs Large Audiences. Ian said a small audience was one where the group size was less than 12 people. I think instead that a small audience might be more like a classroom with 32 people. 

Once I heard it claimed that:

“There are two types of people - those who divide things into two categories, and those who don’t.”

I don’t divide things into just two categories. Back in December 2008 I blogged about how Your presentation style should match both your intent and the size of your audience and Audience size determines working distance and thus presentation style.


















I had pointed out that for dense seating in a square room you would need nine square feet per person, and could calculate the distance as shown above.






































Also, you could list a large series of audience sizes (by powers of two) and the corresponding distances, as is shown above. Some of these have names, but many others do not.