Last week there was a post by David M. Thornton at LinkedIn
on The Official Toastmasters International Members Group titled This Person Gives Three Reasons
Why She Is Not A Toastmaster. So far it has generated almost 50 comments by upset and
angry Toastmasters, including a half-dozen by David defending himself for
posting about that slide show.
I’m not sure whether to laugh or cry at that situation.
Jeanne Trojan had posted Three reasons I’m not a Toastmaster at Slideshare way
back on February 27, 2011. The next day she blogged about it at Outstanding
Presentations, where I made the first comment. I linked to my April 25, 2011
blog post titled Taking potshots at Toastmasters International. Jeanne now has
another web site that doesn’t even bother to link to that 2011 Slideshare,
which already has a huge list of comments. Adding to them now is a senseless waste
of time (the Wikipedia definition for Flogging a dead horse).
It would make more sense for defensive members to restrict
their Bing or Google searches to recent articles or blog posts about
Toastmasters. In Bing you just can click on Any time and click on Past month,
or select a Custom range. In Google, click on Tools and change from Any time to
Past year or Past month.
Making negative comments about Toastmasters International is
an obvious way for a speech coach or writer to get noticed. I have posted about
some of them. The most recent is Charles Crawford who I blogged about on January
22, 2018 in a post titled Toastmasters International misevaluated, and again on
January 28, 2018 in another post titled Toastmasters International misevaluated
again. On July 3, 2016 I blogged about Jane Genova in a post titled Making a
mountain out of a molehill about getting a refund from Toastmasters.
A very subtle put
down of Toastmasters I recently found skirted British defamation law by
not even mentioning
us. In the Spring 2017 issue of The Speaker magazine (from the Association
of Speakers Clubs,
the ASC) their National Vice President Eric Baker proclaimed on page 6:
“My
understanding of other organisations that offer club membership is they do not
all ask people to redo a speech even if it did not reach the required standard.
So at the end of say ten speeches someone receives a certificate which is
worthless because unlike our system there is no guarantee a member has improved!”
If you are not familiar with the ASC you can read about
their genesis from TCBI here.
The graphic of a dead horse was derived from images of a horse
and cart wreck and a cat of nine tails at Openclipart.
No comments:
Post a Comment