Sunday, June 29, 2025

Move on stage to emphasize an idea


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a brief but very useful post by John Zimmer on his Manner of Speaking blog for June 11, 2025 titled Movement on stage emphasizes an idea. He said (as is shown above in my cartoon version):

 

“To emphasize a positive idea (determination, excitement, conviction, etc.), take a step or two forward.”

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And then he also said:

 

"To emphasize a negative idea (struggle, sadness, loss, etc.), take a step or two backward."

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You also can move sideways and stop (as shown above) when making a series of points. On July 25, 2018 I blogged about a post on his Six Minutes blog about Body movement tips for public speakers from Andrew Dlugan.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And back on November 28, 2012 I blogged about what not to do in a post titled Pacing infinitely.

 

 

Thursday, June 26, 2025

Jargon Buster is a useful AI tool for speechwriters


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recently I ran across a useful artificial intelligence (AI) tool for speechwriting from word.studio called the Jargon Buster. To use it, first you paste your text into a box. Then you select one of two options:

 

1] List jargon terms and suggest alternatives.

2] Rewrite the entire text and replace jargon with more accessible language.

 

The image of a corn husking machine came from the January 10, 1857 issue of Scientific American magazine at Wikimedia Commons. 

 

 

Wednesday, June 25, 2025

The U.S. poverty rate has not been ‘Frozen around 15%’ since the Great Society


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sometimes just a little research reveals that a political pundit doesn’t know what he’s talking about. A post by Bob ‘Nugie” Neugebauer at the Gem State Patriot News blog on June 22, 2025 titled Idaho Faces Growth and Ideological Challenges claims:

 

“Our nation’s welfare system represents a catastrophic failure that has entrenched poverty rather than eliminating it. Since Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society programs, poverty rates have remained frozen around 15% instead of continuing their post-World War II decline. This system rewards dependency by incentivizing single-parent households, discouraging marriage, and enabling able-bodied individuals to avoid work.”

 

Did he look that up or just borrow it from somewhere else? I found an article by Rachel Bade at Politico on September 17, 2013 including that headline. It is titled Pro Report, presented by POWERJOBS: Obama orders security revie – Navy cut security to reduce costs – U. S. poverty rate frozen at 15 percent – Uninsured rate declines. It says:

 

U.S. POVERTY RATE FROZEN AT 15 PERCENT. One-in-seven Americans still lived below the poverty line last year, several years out from the recession. (The poverty line, FYI is just over $23,400 for a family of four). That’s about the same as last year, and the sixth straight year without improvement, according to an AP analysis. Although the unemployment rate sank from 9.6 percent in 2010 to 8.1 percent last year, poverty didn’t, and that’s unusual, analysts say: ‘Typically, the poverty rate tends to move in a similar direction as the unemployment rate, so many analysts had been expecting a modest decline in poverty,’ AP’s Hope Yen writes.”

 

There also is a 2017 book by Jon H. Widener titled The Nexus: Understanding Faith and Modern Culture which says:

 

“In the US, the poverty rate was going down until President Lyndon Johnson began the War on Poverty in the 1960s. Since then the poverty rate has been frozen at 14 to 15 percent and has stayed there despite an outlay of $20 trillion over all those years and despite the continuing outlay of $1 trillion a year. The unabashedly collectivist Obama administration continued these policies during its eight years.”

 

Another article at Debt.org on December 21, 2023 titled Poverty in the United States has a section titled Poverty Levels Over Time which instead states:

 

“In the late 1950s the poverty rate in the U.S. was approximately 22%, with just shy of 40 million Americans living in poverty. The rate declined steadily, reaching a low of 11.1% in 1973 and rising to a high of nearly 15% three times – in 1983, 1993, and 2011 – before hitting an all-time low of 10.5% in 2019. However, the 46.7 million Americans in poverty in 2014 was the most ever recorded.”   

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I looked up a detailed report by Robert D. Plotnik et al. of the Institute for Research on Poverty titled The Twentieth Century Record of Inequality and Poverty in the United States (Discussion Paper 1166-98 July 1998). Figure 3 on page 24 is shown above, with data for 1947 to 1996 (I added the times for the Great Society). Since those programs ended in 1968 the poverty rate ranged from 12% to 15% and never was frozen. In 1974 the rate hit a minimum of around 12%, 3% lower than the 15% cited by Mr. Neugebauer.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How about more recently? There is a web page by Abigail Tierney at statista on September 16, 2024 titled Poverty rate in the United States from 1990 to 2023. A replot of her graph is shown above. The only time the rate was ‘frozen’ at around 15% was between 2010 and 2014. It was ‘frozen’ at 12.6% from 2003 to 2005 and at 11.5% from 2020 to 2022. In 2019 (under Trump) the poverty rate had fallen to 10.5%, which is 4.5% lower than the 15% cited by Mr. Neugebauer. Clearly he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

 

The 1883 Josh Shaw painting of empty pockets was adapted from Wikimedia Commons.  

 

 

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Skutnik is speechwriter jargon for someone who gets acknowledged by the President in his State of the Union address


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An article by David Murray at Pro Rhetoric on May 25, 2023 titled “The Lehrman Landing” – and Other Jargon Speechwriters Should Use Constantly includes the following jargon term:

 

Skutnik. On January 13, 1982, a low-level government worker named Lenny Skutnik saved a woman from drowning after a plane crashed in the icy Potomac River. President Reagan invited Skutnik to attend the State of the Union Address a couple weeks later, and called him out during the speech as the kind of American hero we need more of, these days. Such call-outs to ordinary citizens became a staple of State of the Union speeches that continues to this day. By the speechwriters who stage them, they are called ‘Skutniks.’ “

 

Wikipedia has both a page about Lenny Skutnik and a List of Lenny Skutniks. There also is an article from the Congressional Budget Office on June 3, 2010 titled Lenny Skutnik, CBO’s Most Famous Employee, Retires.

 

 Congressional Research Service has Report R44770 on January 9, 2019 titled History, Evolution, and Practices of the President’s State of the Union Address: Frequently Asked Questions. It has a section titled When Did the Tradition of Acknowledging Guests Sitting in the House Gallery Begin? that explains:

 

“The chief executive frequently invites citizens who have distinguished themselves in some field of service or endeavor to be personal guests in the gallery. President Ronald Reagan began the tradition in 1982 by acknowledging Lenny Skutnik in his speech. Since then, most State of the Union addresses have included the direct mention of at least one presidential guest who was in attendance. Presidential speechwriters often refer to these guests as ‘Lenny Skutniks.’ Usually, the achievements or programs for which the President publicly salutes these guests also serve to underscore some major element of the message. For example, guests have included civil rights pioneer Rosa Parks, former President of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai, NBA star and humanitarian Dikembe Mutombo, former Treasury Secretary and Senator Lloyd Bentsen, baseball great Henry ‘Hank’ Aaron, and numerous military servicemembers and veterans.”

 

A recent article by Sherri Kolade at Ragan PR Daily on February 20, 2024 titled Use this decades-old speechwriting technique to create powerful messages today describes:

 

“Reagan’s speechwriter Aram Bakshian, Jr. said that he ‘wrote Lenny Skutnik into the finale’ of Reagan’s speech to play up the hero aspect, according to the Miller Center.

 

‘I wrote the passage that created the hero in the gallery ploy, which unfortunately has been milked to death since and overdone. I almost regret it.’

 

While Bakshian, Jr. may be sick of the tactic, it’s been used so frequently because it works. These Skutniks often resonate with audiences as their stories tug at heartstrings.

 

Michael Ricci, former director of communications for then-Maryland Governor Larry Hogan and former speechwriter and director of communications for John Boehner and Paul Ryan, told PR Daily that speechwriters can use Skutniks to connect the dots with audiences and their sdesire to relate to a hero in a speech.”

 

The image came from a YouTube video of Ronald Reagan Acknowledging Lenny Skutnik 1982.

 

 

Monday, June 23, 2025

Howdahell is jargon for sprinkling local knowledge into a speech


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A blog post by David Murray at Writing Boots on May 23, 2023 is titled Yo, Writer: Yes, Your Best Prose is Jargon-Free. But Your Negotiations with Non-Writers Should Be Jargon-y. One item of jargon he mentioned is:

 

Howdahell: A term for a little local knowledge casually sprinkled into a speech, usually near the beginning. A commencement speaker can bring the crowd to its feet simply by making reference to having a beer at the local college watering hole. ‘Howdahell does Condoleeza Rice know about Suds on State?”

 

He also said it at Pro Rhetoric on May 25, 2023 in an article titled “The Lehrman Landing” – and Other Jargon Speechwriters Should Use Constantly. I blogged about two jargon items in that article. One was in a post on June 13, 2025 titled The Four Part Close for a speech is also known as “The Lehrman Landing.” Another was in a post on June 19, 2025 titled Monroe’s Motivated Sequence is a framework for persuasive speeches.

 

Robert Lehrman’s 2010 book, The Political Speechwriter’s Companion: A guide for writers and speakers says on page 147 that howdahell was invented by Eric Schnure. Another article by Elena Veatch at The Campaign Workshop on August 19, 2019 titled Speechwriting: 7 Questions with Eric Schnure has Eric explain:

 

I like to say that every speech should have a ‘howdahell’ moment. That’s where the audience says to themselves, ‘How the hell did she/he know that about me, my school, my town, my hopes and fears?’ I don’t mean that in a Big Brother kind of way. Instead, it's about creating a moment of community and commonality. When a speaker achieves that - it can be powerful stuff.”

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We will get to know our audience and find a howdahell by asking some of them questions. On January 8, 2024 I blogged about The 5Ws and 1H (or Kipling Method) for planning public speaking or other communication.

 

My devil cartoon was adapted from one at OpenClipArt.

 

 

Sunday, June 22, 2025

Speechwriting, storytelling, and 55-word stories


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back on January 23, 2012 I blogged about 101-word stories and 50-second elevator speeches. Could we get even briefer and tell a story using just fifty-five words? We sure could! Back In fall 1987 Steve Moss created the Fifty-Five Fiction writing contest. In 1995 (and 1998) he had a book of them titled World’s Shortest Stories: Murder. Love. Horror. Suspense.

 

Three excellent articles discuss how 55-word stories have been used in medical education. One June 2010 article by Colleen T. Fogarty in Family Medicine is titled Fifty-five Word Stories: “Small Jewels” for Personal Reflection and Teaching. She has a table describing ten steps for writing a story. And Colleen says:

 

“Well-written 55-word stories include the key elements of narrative: (1) Setting, (2) Character(s), (3) Conflict (something has to happen!), and (4) Resolution (what’s the outcome of the story?) Writers of 55-word stories must remember that just because they are short doesn’t mean they are easy!”

 

A second article by Julie Fashner in the HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine for April 2020 (Volume 1 Number 2) on pages 115 to 117 is titled Creative Writing in Residency Training. And a third 2024 article by Nancy E. Krusen in Translational Science in Occupation (Volume 1, Number 2) is titled 55-Word Stories: Insight into Healthcare.

 

You could tell one or more fifty-five-word stories within a five-to-seven-minute speech for a Toastmasters club meeting.

 

 

Friday, June 20, 2025

Is it true just because I read it in a book? No! Here’s an inaccurate paragraph on speech anxiety

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back on March 2, 2013 I had a post titled I read it in a book, so it must be true. Recently I was looking at the 2020 third edition of J. Dan Rothwell’s book, Practically Speaking. In Chapter 2 on Speech Anxiety there is a section on Pervasiveness of Speech Anxiety: A Common Experience beginning with the following paragraph on page 23 (it also is on page 19 in the 2017 second edition):

 

“Mark Twain once remarked, ‘There are two types of speakers; those who are nervous and those who are liars.’ Overstated perhaps, but fear of public speaking is widespread (Pull, 2012). A survey by Chapman University of 1,500 respondents put the fear factor at 62% (‘The Chapman University Survey,’ 2015). This same study also showed fear of public speaking as greater than fear of heights (61%), drowning (47%), flying (39%), and yes, zombies (18%). The fear of public speaking holds true for both face-to-face and web-based online speeches given to remote audiences (Campbell and Larson, 2012).”

 

On May 12, 2020 I blogged on Did Mark Twain really say there were just nervous speakers or liars? He didn’t – that quote first shows up decades after he died.

 

Professor Rothwell referred to public speaking being widespread - based on a 2012 article by Charles B. Pull in Current Opinion in Psychiatry for 2012 (Volume 25, Number 1 pages 25 to 38) titled Current Status of Knowledge on Public-speaking Anxiety. That article reviewed articles from just August 2008 to August 2011. It omitted one by A.M. Ruscio et al. in Psychological Medicine (November 2007 Volume 38, Number 1, pages 15 to 28) titled Social Fears and Social Phobia in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. I blogged about it on August 12, 2015 in a post titled There’s really no mystery about how common stage fright is and pointed out that result was just 21.2%.

 

And the blog post for the 2015 Chapman Survey of American Fears lists the sum for Very Afraid + Afraid. It says public speaking is ranked #26 at 28.4%, heights is ranked #28 at 27.4%, zombies is ranked #82 at 8.5%, but drowning is not even listed. (It is in the 2014 survey at 19.3%).  Professor Rothwell exaggerated by instead listing the sums for Very Afraid + Afraid + Slightly Afraid. 

 

Finally, the 2012 Campbell and Larson article in the Journal of Instructional Pedagogies titled Public speaking anxiety: comparing face-to-face and web-based speeches tells us:

 

“Of the group of 70 students, 65 responded to the question. Almost half of the students (45.7%) were more anxious about giving their speech face-to-face, and a little more than one third (34.3%) were more anxious about the web-based delivery.”

 

On September 6, 2022 I blogged about he we should Beware of surveys with small sample sizes, which have large margins of error. For a sample size n = 70, the margin is 11.7%. The difference between face-to-face and web-based is 11.4% - within the margin and not significant.

 

My cartoon was modified from one at OpenClipArt.

 

 

Thursday, June 19, 2025

Monroe’s Motivated Sequence is a framework for persuasive speeches


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On June 13, 2025 I blogged about how The Four Part Close for a speech is also known as “The Lehrman Landing”. In that post I linked to an article by David Murray at Pro Rhetoric on May 25, 2025 titled “The Lehrman Landing” – and Other Jargon Speechwriters Should Use Constantly. He said another jargon item was:

 

Monroe’s Motivated Sequence is an all-purpose speech structure codified in the 1950s by a Purdue University engineer geek named Alan Monroe. Or, if you want to mesmerize a gullible marketing executive, you could say the structure is inspired by the breathy oratorical style of Marilyn Monroe.”

 

There is a Wikipedia page for it. A paraphrase for its five steps is:

 

Attention

Capture audience interest with a compelling opening.

 

Need

Show there is a problem affecting the audience.

 

Satisfaction

Offer a practical and believable solution.

 

Visualization

Help the audience see benefits for the solution.

 

Action

Directly tell the audience what to do next.    

 

A succinct description is in a University of South Carolina UPSTATE Library Guide web page titled SPCH 201 H: Honors Public Speaking: Monroe’s Motivated Sequence Outline. Also, there is a recent article by Nazli Turken and Steven D. Cohen at ORMS TODAY informs on December 6, 2024 titled The science of effective presentations: Using Monroe’s Motivated Sequence to convey analytical findings.

 

 

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

An amusing xkcd cartoon about types of bridges


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Randal Munroe’s xkcd cartoon for June 2, 2025 is titled Bridge Types. As shown above, it has sixteen of them, which are discussed over at Explain xkcd. Some make good sense: truss, arch, suspended arch, and suspension. The fifteenth is labeled as fun and it has a loop in the center.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But the idea of a double loop as part of a scenic railway (roller coaster) was used almost twelve decades ago in a Puck cartoon titled Pity the Poor Brooklynite, as is shown above. It came from page 5 of the October 24, 1906 issue of that magazine!

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is another Puck cartoon (shown above) from page 3 of March 7, 1906 with a bridge alternative titled The Brooklyn Strapid Transit System.

 

 

Monday, June 16, 2025

Memorable prop handouts for your speech audience from a dollar store


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have been skimming through a 2004 book by Robert V. Smith titled The Elements of Great Speechmaking: Adding drama and intrigue. On page 71 in a section titled Artifacts and Props his second paragraph says:

 

“You have likely been to meetings – especially lunches and dinners associated with professional gatherings – where the host organization provides a small gift -be it a lapel pin or something of greater worth. Have you noticed how many people can’t keep their hands off of the gift during the subsequent event. The gift becomes a type of talisman – a connection object. Now imagine that you plan such a scenario, only using an object of your own choosing – an object that ties into a message that you wish to imbue in the minds of audience members (see figure 9.4). This can work like magic.”

 

For example, for a speech about marketing or personal branding and the need to always blow your own horn, as shown above, you might hand out little plastic horns (at the dollar store a pack of six is just $1.25).

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Or you might discuss how preparing great slides is like having a magic wand – and hand out pocket-sized wands, as shown above.

 

 

Sunday, June 15, 2025

Pearls Before Swine cartoon about navigating with maps or atlases


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

When traveling, I currently navigate using Apple Maps on my iPhone, or my Garmin GPS. 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But when I fly somewhere, I take along an AAA map (shown above) as a backup. 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And when I drive around a state, I carry a road atlas (as shown above). With it open on my lap I can keep track of exactly where I am, and turn off when traffic is blocked up ahead.

 

On June 1, 2025 Stephan Pastis has a Pearls Before Swine cartoon with dialogue about how we previously used maps:

 

Stephan:

 Well, I had all of these fold-out maps in the trunk.

 And a bound book of maps called a ‘Thomas Guide.’

 And if it was an unfamiliar city I got free maps at the AAA office.

 Then the person in the passenger seat would look at them and try to tell you which way to go.

 And if all that failed you could ask for help from a gas station service attendant…

 I see a question.

 

Young girl: My friends and I were wondering if you had electricity back then.

 

Stephan: Yes. We had electricity you @*#@!

 

Goat: And that’s why I don’t talk to young people.

 

Rat: Now explain Blockbuster video stores!

 

 

Friday, June 13, 2025

The Four Part Close for a speech is also known as “The Lehrman Landing”


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

My previous post on June 11, 2025 titled Kairos is a Greek word about timing that speechwriters should know linked to an article by David Murray at Pro Rhetoric on May 25, 2023 titled “The Lehrman Landing” – and Other Jargon Speechwriters Should Use Constantly.

 

How does David describe The Lehrman Landing? He says:

 

“This is a term we’re trying to popularize ourselves – renaming of the ‘Four Part Close,’ a type of elaborate and effective speech conclusion that speechwriter Robert Lehrman has been teaching since he learned it himself, under the tutelage of Kurt Vonnegut at the University of Iowa in about 1967. Don’t you think Bob deserves to have it named after him?”

 

But what’s in it, and is there a great example of this ending? There indeed is one in Robert A. Lehrman’s 2010 book, The Political Speechwriter’s Companion: A guide for writers and speakers, in his section on THE FOUR-PART CLOSE beginning on page 203. He talks about the Inspirational Example, the Lesson Drawn, the Call to Action, and the Clincher:

 

“Kennedy’s inaugural speech – along with King’s – has been analyzed in great detail. Here we look only at the conclusion, as full of famous lines as a Shakespearean soliloquy.

 

Sorenson’s conclusion clearly relies on the devices of language we reviewed earlier, especially litany and antithesis. And like King’s [I Have a Dream], it follows the four-part structure so useful for speech, which seeks to inspire an audience to act. Read through this annotated version to see how they fit together. Then listen to it, using the link on page 205.

 

INSPIRATIONAL EXAMPLE

 

It might be a quote, story, series of examples, montage, or poem. Often taken from history, an inspirational example might feature sacrifice, or someone succeeding against odds. As Kennedy’s example of sacrifice, Sorensen chose the graves of American soldiers to remind the audience that other generations fought to keep America free [my italics]:

 

Since the country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.  

 

LESSON DRAWN

 

Having moved the audience, speakers draw a lesson from it – an analogy, making the example relevant for today. Sometimes the lesson may mean you should imitate the example. (What they did we can do!) Sometimes speakers will pose a question or paint two views of the future, thus creating a moment of suspense. (Will we choose correctly?)

 

Kennedy’s lesson: We must act like those brave ‘young Americans.’ The ‘trumpet’ that summons them, he says, summons us to ‘defend freedom.’ Note how this step intertwines with Monroe. Kennedy asks his listeners if they will join them (but doesn’t urge – that comes later). Then he outlines a vision of the success that can – not will – happen if they do. [Italics mine]

 

Now the trumpet summons us again. Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join me in that historic effort?

 

In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger.

 

The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it – and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

 

CALL TO ACTION

 

What next? As Monroe suggests, don’t let your audience off the hook Make the sale. What is it you want your audience to do? Having asked if they will join him, Kennedy launches into a third step, a call-to-action litany appealing to what alert or obsessive readers will remember formed the highest step in Maslow’s pyramid: self-fulfillment. [My italics]

 

And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.

 

My fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man ….

 

Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you.

 

Could he end there? It would seem abrupt. And so this four-part close involves a final step – the very last line.

 

CLINCHER

 

Clinchers usually remind listeners of the larger implications of their actions. By now speakers have moved beyond the mundane issues of which bills to pass or which candidates to support. They end by urging audiences to take action because that action will bring a noble end. And what is that noble end? Often it’s freedom, the American dream, a better future for our children, or some other abstraction Americans value. Kennedy’s is unusual – he promises only one ‘sure reward’ [italics mine]

 

With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking his blessing and his help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.

 

The language of Kennedy’s clincher is less concrete than other sections, and more hackneyed (‘the land we love’). Kennedy is careful to hew to the prerequisite of important political speeches by invoking God, which he refers to as a male. But his final sentence remains unusual in political life for three things he doesn’t do. Kennedy doesn’t promise success.  He doesn’t assure his audience of the rightness of their actions, since ‘history’ is the final judge. And while invoking God, he doesn’t simply say what has become the fashion today (God bless you, and God bless America!). Instead, he takes sides in one of the great debates of contemporary religion, reminding his listeners that good works, not just faith, will save them.

 

But by inverting the usual grammatical structure to create suspense, by using alliteration, repetition, and antithesis, his clincher surprises his audience, becomes memorable, and justifies its position as Kennedy’s final sentence.”

 

I quoted from the first edition of Lehrman’s book because I could find it at the Boise State University library. There is a second edition in 2019 with Eric L. Schnure as the co-author. The book grew from 362 pages to 536 pages.

 

The image was modified from this jigsaw puzzle at OpenClipArt.

 

 

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Kairos is a Greek word about timing that speechwriters should know

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I recently ran across an article by David Murray at Pro Rhetoric on May 25, 2023 titled “The Lehrman Landing” – and Other Jargon Speechwriters Should Use Constantly. One term is Kairos:

 

Kairos: Often forgotten as an element as important as logos, pathos and ethos, Kairos refers to the timeliness of an argument, or more broadly to the ‘moment’ in which any communication occurs. The Gettysburg Address would not have gone over big at a supermarket opening in 1975.”

 

There is another article by Jennifer Calonia at Grammarly on February 1, 2024 titled What is Kairos: History, Definition, and Examples. And there is a web page by Gideon O. Burton at

Silva Rhetoricae on Kairos. Also John Zimmer at Manner of Speaking on July 27, 2022 has an article titled Kairos: The foundation of rhetoric that explains:

 

“The ancient Greeks had two words for ‘time’. The first was ‘chronos’ (χρόνος), which referred to chronological time. Words like ‘chronological’ and ‘chronology’ come from chronos. The second was ‘kairos’ (καιρός), which means the right moment or opportunity. It is this second meaning which is of supreme importance when it comes to public speaking.”

 

The clock was adapted from an image at OpenClipArt.

 

 

Monday, June 9, 2025

Plagiarism and speechwriting


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary says that to plagiarize is:

 

“to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own; use (another’s production) without crediting the source.”

 

An article by Lindsay Kramer at Grammarly on June 2, 2022 titled 7 Common Types of Plagiarism, With Examples says those types are: accidental, complete, direct, paraphrasing, patchwork, self, and source-based.

 

There is a brief, useful article by Jesse Scinto on pages 14 and 15 of the March 2017 Toastmaster Magazine titled What is Plagiarism and How Can You Avoid It?

 

Some university libraries have guides for their courses on public speaking including plagiarism. For example, there is one by Amy Windham of Pepperdine University which is a Learning and Research Guide – COM 180 Public speaking & Rhetorical Analysis titled What is Plagiarism? And at the University of Southern California there is a Research Guide – Com 204 Public Speaking:Plagiarism. A more detailed guide is a six-page pdf from University of Missouri – St. Louis titled Avoiding Plagiarism. Back on February 24, 2015 I blogged about How to do a better job of speech research than the average Toastmaster (by using your friendly local and state university libraries).

 

There also is another article by Dane Cobain at Speakerhub on August 30, 2022 titled How Public Speakers Can Avoid Plagiarism with the following paragraph titles:

 

Don’t plagiarize

Use a plagiarism checker

Give credit where credit is due

Create original ideas

Run your idea past someone

Google your topics

Ask for permission

Use exact match searches

Plan what you’re going to say

Ask for feedback

 

And the 2018 open-source textbook by Lori and Mark Halverson-Wente titled The Public Speaking Resource Project has Chapter 26 about Avoiding Plagiarism.

 

For an excellent example of what to avoid, look at yet another article from Jonathan Bailey at Plagiarism Today on July 19, 2016 titled The Melania Trump Plagiarism Scandal. Her Republican National Convention speech copied one by Michelle Obama.

 

The cartoon burglar was adapted from OpenClipArt.